Cover not available

In:Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 103–134

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chiastic iconicity

Refiguring symmetry

ORCiD logo with link | University of Waterloo
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.06har
Abstract
Chiastic structure (ABBA) leverages the iconicity principles of identity, sequential order, and quantity for consolidated iconicities of harmonious balance and cyclicity, effecting an aesthetic response that is very often but somewhat incongruously associated with mirror-image symmetry. The ABBA pattern does not effect this response alone, however. Chiastic figures collocate preferentially with other figures to achieve these effects, especially including figures of parallelism. These figural convergences, collocating additionally with certain grammatical features, raise the iconicity stakes somewhat further to enact a quite specific suite of meanings: comprehensiveness, irrelevance of order, reciprocal specification, and reciprocal energy. These claims are developed with particular attention to lexical chiasmus, the rhetorical scheme known as ‘antimetabole’.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chiastic diagrammatization
  • 3.Chiastic ‘symmetry’
  • 4.‘Chiastic’ symmetry
  • 5.‘Chiastic’ meaning
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Glossary of rhetorical figures mentioned in the chapter
  • References
References (72)
References
Aarnio, J. 2008. Rhetoric and representation : Exploring the cultural meaning of the natural sciences in contemporary popular science writing and literature. PhD Dissertation, Department of English, University of Helsinki.
Anderson, D. 1984. Peirce on metaphor. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 20(4): 453–468.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1957. A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1988. The iconicity of rhetorical figures: ‘Schemes’ as devices for textual cohesion. Language and Style 21(2):162–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1941 [1938]). Literature as equipment for living. Philosophy of Literary Form. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, pp. 293–304.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bush, G. W. and [Gerson, M.] 2001. Address before a joint session of the Congress on the United States response to the terrorist attacks of September 11. (20 September). GovInfo. [URL]
Chomsky, A. N. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Beyond fascism: Noam Chomsky interviewed by John Holder and Doug Morris. ZNet, 24 May. [URL]
[Pseudo-]Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1954 [c95 BCE]. Ad C. Herennium de ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium). Harry Caplan (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CP. See Peirce (1931 [1877–1904]).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickens, C. 1884. Great Expectations. London: R. Worthington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 2007. Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubremetz, M. 2017. Marie’s corpus. [URL]
Dubremetz, M., and Nivre, J. 2018. Rhetorical figure detection: Chiasmus, epanaphora, epiphora. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 17 May. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumas, A. 1849. Les trois mousquetaires. Paris: Dufour & Mulat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. 1999. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farnsworth, W. 2010. Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric. Boston: David R. Godine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filkuková, P., and Klempe, S. H. 2013. Rhyme as reason in commercial and social advertising. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 54(5); 423–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greer, Germaine. 1988, June 3. The proper study of womankind. Times Literary Supplement.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, R. A., and Di Marco, C. 2017. Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation. Argument & Computation 8(3): 211–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2003. Iconicity. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics Volume 1. Second edition. W. Frawley (ed.), 57–61. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiraga, M. K. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Analysing Texts. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kara-Yakoubian, M., Walker, A. C. , Sharpinskyi, K. , Assadourian, G. , Fugelsang, J. A. , and Harris, R. A. 2022. Chiasmus and the Keats heuristic. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumar, N., and Juneja, J. K. 2006. Comprehensive Objective Physics. New Delhi: Laxmi Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lanham, R. 1991. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Second edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1998. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. D. F. Orton and R. D. Anderson (trans.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., and Short, M. 2007 [1981]. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Second edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Guin, U. K. 2019 [1969]. The Left Hand of Darkness. New York: Ace.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, A. 2013. Monsanto sows seeds of protest. Denver Post (28 May).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ljungberg, C. (2020). Crisscrossing James Joyce’s Ulysses: Chiasmus and cognition. In Operationalizing Iconicity. P. Perniss, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 17, 199–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Theory of Society 1. Rhodes Barrett (trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, C. 2017. ‘Strong and stable’ – A lesson in the use of consonance, rhyme-as-reason, and the Keats heuristic. Medium.com (3 May). [URL]
Mandela, Nelson. 1994. The Long Walk to Freedom. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1993. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S., and Tofighbakhsh, J. 1999. The Keats heuristic: Rhyme as reason in aphorism interpretation. Poetics. 26 (4): 235–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. and Tofighbakhsh, J. 2000. Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science. 11 (5): 424–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, W. G. 2001. Iconicity and rhetoric. In The Motivated Sign. O. Fischer and M. Nänny (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 2, 305–322. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nänny, M. 1986. Iconicity in Literature. Word & Image 2(3): 199–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nänny, M. 1987. Chiastic structures in literature: Some forms and functions. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 3: 75–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Netanjahu, Binyamin. 2014. Full text of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s UN speech. The Jerusalem Post (29 September).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1687. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Jussu Societatis Regiae. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1803 [1687]. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Three volumes. Andrew Motte (trans.). London. H.D. Symonds.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nöth, W. 2001. Semiotic foundations of iconicity in language and literature. In The Motivated Sign. O. Fischer and M. Nänny (eds.) Iconicity in Language and Literature 2, 17–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrman, R. 1986. Samuel Butler and the Meaning of Chiasmus. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Creating the world in our image. A new theory of love of symmetry and iconicist desire. In Form Miming Meaning. M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 1, 59–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, S. (writer), and Moore, S. D. (director). 1998. The joy of sect. The Simpsons, episode 191. J. L. Brooks (producer). Los Angeles, CA: Twentieth Century Fox Television.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C., and Harris, R. A. 2017. Antimetabole and image schemata: Ontological and vector space models. JOWO (Joint Ontology Workshops) 2017. Free University of Bozen. Bolzano, Italy. 21 September. [URL]
Pasteur, L. 1886 [1883]. La dissymétrie moléculaire. Conférences de Société chimique de France. Paris: Bureaux de la Revue scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1931 [1877–1904]. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelkey, J. 2017. The Semiotics of X: Chiasmus, Cognition, and Extreme Body Memory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penrose, R. 1989. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plett, H. F. 2010. Literary Rhetoric: Concepts – Structures – Analyses. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puttenham, G. 1869 [1589]. The Arte of English Poesie. E. Arber (ed.) London: Alex Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, A., and Rathburn, L. 1996. Antimetabole. In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition. Theresa Enos (ed.). New York: Garland, 12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sartwell, C. 2014. The left-right political spectrum is bogus. The Atlantic (June 20). [URL]
Sunday edition. 2014 (24 August). CBC Radio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. 1999. Linguistic expression of perceptual relationships. Iconicity as a principle of text organization (a case study). In Form Miming Meaning. M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds.), Iconicity in Language and Literature 1, 409–420. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems, vol I. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2017. Finding reason in rhyme, nearly every time. CogBlog (16 April). [URL]
Tubaj, E. 2019. Rhyming for a reason: Why Rhyming slogans are more effective in communicating big ideas. CogBlog (26 November). [URL]
Turner, M. 1998. Figure. In Figurative Language and Thought, A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. W. Gibbs, Jr., and M. Turner (eds.), 44–87. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vickers, B. 1988. In Defence of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welsh, John. 1981. Chiasmus in Antiquity. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wescott, R. 1971. Linguistic iconism. Language, 47(2): 416–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weyl, H. 1952. Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Harris, Randy Allen
2023. Rules Are Rules: Rhetorical Figures and Algorithms. In Logic and Algorithms in Computational Linguistics 2021 (LACompLing2021) [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1081], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Pelkey, Jamin
2021. Zhuangzi, Peirce, and the butterfly dreamscape: concentric meaning in the Qiwulun 齊物論. Chinese Semiotic Studies 17:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue