Cover not available

In:Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 27–46

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The iconicity ring model for sound symbolism

ORCiD logo with link | Nagoya University
ORCiD logo with link | Keio University
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.02aki
Abstract
The ‘iconicity ring model’ proposed in this chapter depicts a lexicon’s evolutionary path from genuine iconicity (termed ‘primary iconicity’) to arbitrariness to another type of iconicity (termed ‘emergent iconicity’) that emerges from linguistic systematicity. The model captures the universality and language-specificity of sound symbolism and its role in lexical acquisition. Iconicity loss in ideophones illustrates the shift from primary iconicity to arbitrariness, whereas ideophonization exemplifies the shift from arbitrariness to emergent iconicity via systematicity. The two types of iconicity are mixed together in individual lexicons, providing a clue to the symbol grounding problem.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Primary iconicity in sound symbolism
    • 2.1Universality
    • 2.2Early acquisition
  • 3.Emergent iconicity in sound symbolism
    • 3.1Language-specificity
    • 3.2Later acquisition
  • 4.Shift from primary to emergent iconicity
    • 4.1From primary iconicity to arbitrariness
    • 4.2From arbitrariness to systematicity to emergent iconicity
  • 5.Implications for the symbol grounding problem
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (70)
References
Ahlner, F. and Zlatev, J. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, K. 2009. A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.
2011. Toward a phonosemantic definition of iconic words. In Semblance and Signification, P. Michelucci, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Nihongo no onomatope to gengo ruikeiron [Japanese ideophones and linguistic typology]. In Nihongo kenkyū to gengo riron kara mita gengo ruikeiron [Linguistic typology from the perspectives of Japanese linguistics and linguistic theories], H. Kubozono, H. Noda, P. Pardeshi and Y. Matsumoto (eds), 49–73. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ameel, E., Malt, B. and Storms, G. 2008. Object naming and later lexical development: From baby bottle to bear bottle. Journal of Memory and Language 58: 262–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H. and Thierry, G. 2015. Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants. Cortex 63: 196–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Assaneo, M. F., Nichols, J. I. and Trevisan, M. A. 2011. The anatomy of onomatopoeia. PLoS ONE 6: e28317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Awoyale, Y. 1983–1984. On the semantic fields of Yoruba ideophones. Journal of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria 2: 11–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badenoch, N. and Osada, T. 2019. A Dictionary of Mundari Expressives. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F. and Christiansen, M. H. 2016. Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 10818–10823. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brett, L., Chiat, S. and Pilcher, C. 1987. Stages and units in output processing: Some evidence from voicing and fronting processes in children. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 165–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, M.-H. 1994. Vowel Harmony in Korean: A Grounded Phonology Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Choborau, N. 2011. Fushigi na somerachan [Mysterious Somera], Vol. 2. Tokyo: Ichijinsha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. and Monaghan, P. 2016. Division of labor in vocabulary structure: Insights from corpus analyses. Topics in Cognitive Science 8: 610–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, N. 2001. The ideophone in Didinga. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, F. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1994. i: big, a: small. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 107–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70: 363–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. and Akita, K. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53: 501–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Monaghan, P., Lupyan, G. and Christiansen, M. H. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language: Empirical and theoretical advances. Trends in Cognitive Science 19: 603–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M. and Perniss, P. 2020. Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form-meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition 12: 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S. and Mitterer, H. 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92: e117–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, A. 2014. Phonetic detail and dimensionality in sound-shape correspondences: Refining the bouba-kiki paradigm. Language and Speech 57: 367–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. 2001. Languages within Language: An Evolutive Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fort, M., Lammertink, I., Peperkamp, S., Guevara-Rukoz, A., Fikkert, P. and Tsuji, S. 2018. Symbouki: A meta-analysis on the emergence of sound symbolism in early language acquisition. Developmental Science 21: e12659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gasser, M. 2004. The origin of arbitrariness in language. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, K. Forbus, D. Gentner and T. Regier (eds), 434–439. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2018. Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42: 335–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. and Ohala, J. J. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2017. Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 196–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, M. 2017. The “symbol grounding problem” reinterpreted from the perspective of language acquisition. In Meaning, Mind and Communication Explorations in Cognitive Semiotics, J. Zlatev, G. Sonesson and P. Konderak (eds), 145–159. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, M. and Kita, S. 2014. The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M. and Okada, H. 2008. Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 109: 54–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, M., Miyazaki, M., Yeung, H., Hidaka, S., Kantartzis, K., Okada, H. and Kita, S. 2015. Sound symbolism facilitates word learning in 14-month-olds. PLoS ONE 10: e0116494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P. and Vigliocco, G. 2007. What do English speakers know about gera-gera and yota-yota?: A cross-linguistic investigation of mimetic words for laughing and walking. Japanese-Language Education around the Globe 17: 53–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, N. E., Anikin, A., Carling, G. and Holmer, A. 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24: 253–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M. and Kita, S. 2011. Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science 35: 575–586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H. and Smith, K. 2008. Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 10681–10685. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köhler, W. 1929 [1947]. Gestalt Psychology. New York: Horace Liveright.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, N. 2018. Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Laboratory Phonology 9: 1. 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masuda, K. 2007. The physical basis for phonological iconicity. In Insistent Images, E. Tabakowska, C. Ljungberg and O. Fischer (eds), 57–71. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, B. 2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25: 507–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S. 2014. How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Msimang, C. T. and Poulos, G. 2001. The ideophone in Zulu: A re-examination of conceptual and descriptive notions. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 235–250. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NHK Great East Japan Earthquake Archive. Tokyo: NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation). [URL] (last accessed: 21 March 2021)
Nielsen, A. K. S. and Dingemanse, M. 2021. Iconicity in word learning and beyond: A critical review. Language and Speech 64: 52–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Occhino-Kehoe, C., Anible, B., Wilkinson, E. and Morford, J. R. 2017. Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder: How language experience affects perceived iconicity. Gesture 16: 99–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, G. 2017. Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: A review. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M. and Vouloumanos, A. 2013. Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114: 173–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pejovic, J. and Molnar, M. 2017. The development of spontaneous sound-shape matching in monolingual and bilingual infants during the first year. Developmental Psychology 53: 581–586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña, M., Mehler, J. and Nespor, M. 2011. The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development. Psychological Science 22: 1419–1421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Lu, J. C., Morgan, G. and Vigliocco, G. 2017. Mapping language to the world: The role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science 21: e12551.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M. and Lupyan, G. 2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE 10: e0137147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. and Hubbard, E. M. 2001. Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 3–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saalbach, H. and Imai, M. 2007. Scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136: 405–501.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. The relation between linguistic categories and cognition: The case of numeral classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes 27: 381–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saji, N., Akita, K., Kantartzis, K., Kita, S. and Imai, M. 2019. Cross-linguistically shared and language-specific sound symbolism in novel words elicited by locomotion videos in Japanese and English. PLoS ONE 14: e0218707. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saji, N., Asano, M. and Imai, M. 2020. Acquisition of the meaning of the word orange requires understanding of the meanings of red, pink and purple: Constructing a lexicon as a connected system. Cognitive Science 44: e12813. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saji, N., Imai, M., Saalbach, H., Zhang, Y., Shu, H. and Okada, H. 2011. Word learning does not end at fast-mapping: Evolution of verb meanings through reorganization of an entire semantic domain. Cognition 118: 45–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 225–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, W. and Wu, Y. 2014. Which way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese. Linguistics 52: 1237–1292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. 1997. The ecological foundations of iconicity. In Semiotics around the World: Synthesis in Diversity: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of the IASS, I. Rauch and G. F. Carr (eds), 739–742. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Volume 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, A. L., Akita, K. and Do, Y. 2020. Iconicity ratings across the Japanese lexicon: A comparative study with English. Linguistics Vanguard 6: 20190088. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, A. L. and Do, Y. 2019. Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4: 72. 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wienold, G. 1995. Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organisation of Language, U. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. Stechow and G. Wienold (eds), 301–340. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, N. 2019. Onomatope no rekishi 1: Sono shujusō to shiteki suii; “obenchara” nado no goshi. [The history of onomatopoeia 1: Their various characteristics and historical changes; the history of words like ‘obenchara’]. Tokyo: Kazama Shobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Sidhu, David M.
2025. Sound Symbolism in the Lexicon: A Review of Iconic‐Systematicity. Language and Linguistics Compass 19:1 DOI logo
Sidhu, David M. & Johanna Peetz
2025. Sounds of the future and past. British Journal of Psychology 116:2 ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Iida, Hinano & Kimi Akita
2024. Iconicity Emerges From Language Experience: Evidence From Japanese Ideophones and Their English Equivalents. Cognitive Science 48:12 DOI logo
Körtvélyessy, Lívia
2024. In search of a semiotic model for onomatopoeia. Folia Linguistica 58:3 ► pp. 783 ff. DOI logo
Imai, Mutsumi & Kimi Akita
2023. The Iconicity Ring Hypothesis Bridges the Gap Between Symbol Grounding and Linguistic Relativity. Topics in Cognitive Science 15:4 ► pp. 676 ff. DOI logo
McLean, Bonnie, Michael Dunn & Mark Dingemanse
2023. Two measures are better than one: combining iconicity ratings and guessing experiments for a more nuanced picture of iconicity in the lexicon. Language and Cognition 15:4 ► pp. 716 ff. DOI logo
Van Hoey, Thomas
2023. ABB, a salient prototype of collocate–ideophone constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue