In:Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 231–244
In the kingdom of shadows
Towards a cognitive definition of photographic media
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.14sad
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.14sad
Abstract
The essay identifies some of the cognitive processes
underlying the appeal of photography and film. Unlike painting or
drawing, the photographic media are primarily indexical, with the
implied physical connection between object and image. Like painting
however, photographic media are also iconic, in the sense of
perceived resemblance between object and its representation. Also,
the restricted angle of vision caused by the photographic/cinematic
frame privileges the observer, creating composition and semantic
tensions between objects within the frame. These properties of the
photographic media are cognitively supported by human instinctive
alertness to indexical signs and moving objects, by the assumption
of identity between objects that happen to be similar, and by innate
preferences for viewpoints that allow the observer the advantage of
seeing without being seen. It is the evolutionary stability of these
cognitive dispositions that gives photography and film their
universal appeal.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Shadows on the screen
- 3.The indexicality of photographic media
- 4.Animated photography
- 5.The iconicity of photographic media
- 6.The photographic frame
Notes References
References (30)
Arnheim, R. 1960. Art
and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative
Eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
1982. The
Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual
Arts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bazin, A. 2005. Cinematic
realism. In The
Philosophy of Film: Introductory Text and
Readings, T. E. Wartenberg and A. Curran (eds), 59–69. Oxford: Blackwell.
Briggs, A. and Burke, P. 2005. A
Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the
Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Carroll, N. 1995. Towards
an ontology of the moving
image. In Philosophy
and Film, C. A. Freeland and T. E. Wartenberg (eds), 68–88. New York: Routledge.
Dutton, D. 2009. The
Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human
Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frazer, J. 2002
[1922]. The Golden Bough: A Study in
Religion and Magic. Mineola, NY: Dover Publication.
Gombrich, E. H. 1995. Shadows.
The Depiction of Cast Shadows in Western
Art. London: National Gallery.
Harding, C. and Popple, S. 1996. In
the Kingdom of Shadows: A Companion to Early
Cinema. London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Jarvie, I. 1987. Philosophy
of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology,
Aesthetics. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kaplan, S. 1992. Environmental
preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using
organism. In The
Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of
Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (eds), 581–598. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Orians, G. H., and Heerwagen, J. H. 1992. Evolved
responses to
landscapes. In The
Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of
Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (eds), 555–579. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. 1998. Collected
Papers of Charles Sanders
Peirce, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds). Vol. II. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Rogers, F. R. and Rogers, M. A. 1986. Painting
and Poetry: Form, Metaphor, and the Language of
Literature. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
Sadowski, P. 2009. From
Interaction to Symbol: A Systems View of the Evolution of
Signs and
Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2018. The
Semiotics of Light and Shadows: Modern Visual Arts and
Weimar
Cinema. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
