In:Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 199–210
Crisscrossing James Joyce’s Ulysses
Chiasmus and cognition
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.12lju
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.12lju
Abstract
Chiasmus fundamentally involves iconicity. As a
bi-lateral symmetrical figure that can have both an ornamental and a
rhetorical function, it occurs on all levels of texts–sounds and
graphemes, words, sentences, lines, chapters and entire books as
well as on the narrative and on the conceptual level. The chiastic
mirror-image design in which the second part is balanced against the
first is however not limited to language but also appears in art and
architecture. As recent cognitive research has shown, chiasmus forms
an important strategy through its simple but unique design. This has
to do with its spatial shape and how the crisscrossing of lines and
paths that takes place in the X-figure is cognised, perceptually and
experientially – suggesting itself as the origin of human abilities
such as forming analogies and using conceptual integration. This is
what my contribution explores, with example from James Joyce’s
Ulysses.
Article outline
- 1.Chiastic structures and their cognitive effects
- 2.Multidirectionality
- 3.Multidimensionality
- 4.Polytemporality
- 5.Multisensoriality
Notes References
References (34)
Anyfanti, A. 2003–4. Time,
space, and consciousness in James Joyce’s
Ulysses. Hypermedia
Joyce
Studies, 4.2.
Buning, M. 1993. The
chiasmus: Joyce and Beckett’s master
trope. In In
Principle, Beckett is Joyce, F. (ed.), 45–60. Edinburgh: Split Pea Press.
Carter, P. 2010. The
Road to Botany Bay: An Essay in Spatial
History. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Chiou, R. and A. Rich. 2014. The
role of conceptual knowledge in understanding synesthesia:
evaluating contemporary findings from a “hub-and-spokes”
perspective. Frontiers in
Psychology / Cognitive
Science, vol. 5, no. 105 (February):1–18.
Danius, S. 2002. The
Senses of Modernism: Technology, Perception, and
Aesthetics. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Fischer, O. 2007. Morphosyntactic
Change. Functional and Formal
Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greber, E. 1998. Palindromon –
Anagrammatismos – Revolutio: The palindrome from the
perspective of cultural
semiotics. The
Nabokovian. [URL]. Downloaded 10 November 2018.
Hamada, J., Kaname, A., Fukuda, S. T., U. Chigusa, Fukushi, K., and P. A. van der Helm. 2016. A
group theoretical model of symmetry
cognition. Acta
Psychologica 171, 128–137.
Hart, C. 1974. Wandering
rocks. In James
Joyce’s Ulysses: Critical
Essays, Hart, C. and D. Hayman, (eds.), 181–216. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hofstadter, D. 1995. Fluid
Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the
Fundamental Mechanisms of
Thought. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Itkonen, E. 2005. Analogy
as Structure and
Process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Joyce, J. 1922. Ulysses. Gabler, H. W., with W. Steppe and C. Melchior (eds)
and with an afterword by M.
Groden. New York, NY: Vintage, Random House.
Lissner, P. A. 2007. Chi-Thinking:
Chiasmus and
Cognition. PhD-Thesis University of Maryland, College Park, MD (unpublished).
Ljungberg, C. 2007. Damn
Mad: Palindromic figurations in literary
narratives. In Insisting
Images, E. Tabakowska, C. Ljungberg, and O. Fischer (eds), 247–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1998. Wholeness
Restored. Love of Symmetry as a Shaping Force in the
Writings of Henry James, Kurt Vonnegut, Samulel Butler and
Raymond
Chandler. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
1987. Chiastic Structures in Literature: Some forms and functions. In SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 3: 75-96.
2002. Ikonicitet. In Intermedialitet: Ord, bild, ton i samspel, Lund, H. (ed), 131-137. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Nöth, W. 1998. Symmetry
in signs and semiotic
systems. In Interdisciplinary
Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic
Analysis 3.1 (Spring): 47–62.
2008. Semiotic foundations of natural linguistics and diagrammatic iconicity. In Naturalness
and Iconicity in
Language, Klaas Willems and Ludovico de Cuypere, (eds.) 73–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pelkey, J. 2017. The
Semiotics of X: Chiasmus, Cognition and Extreme Body
Memory. London: Bloomsbury.
Schneider, U. 1989. Mediatization
in ‘Aeolus’ and ‘Oxen of the
Sun.’ Joyce, Modernity, and
Its Mediation, European Joyce
Studies, C. van Boheemen, (ed.), 15–22. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Serres, M. 2009
[1985]. The Five Senses: A Philosophy
of Mingled
Bodies, trans. M. Sankey and P. Cowley. London: Continuum.
Serres, M., and B. Latour. 1995
[1990]. Conversations on Science,
Culture, and
Time, trans. R. Lapidus. Ann Arbor, MN: University of Michigan.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Jorge Eduardo Urueña López, Jamin Pelkey & L’udmila Lacková Bennett
Harris, Randy Allen
2022. Chiastic iconicity. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 103 ff.
Pelkey, Jamin
Pelkey, Jamin
Pelkey, Jamin
2022. Tonal iconicity and narrative transformation. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
