In:Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 105–122
System-internal and system-external phonic expressivity
Iconicity and Balkan affricates
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.06jos
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.06jos
Abstract
The expressive function of language as realized
phonically is explored here through an examination of the major role
that affricates play in various Balkan languages, but especially
Greek and Albanian, in marking words as showing emotion, affect,
color, and similar sorts of expressive dimensions. Moreover, it is
argued that language contact is an important causal factor here, in
part through the enhancement of already existing tendencies in the
languages in question and in part through the recognition that
system-external elements can have an “exotic” character and thus can
be especially suitable for participating in phonic expressivity.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Identifying expressiveness
- 3.The Greek evidence: [ts] / [dz]
- 4.The Albanian evidence
- 5.The role of language contact: Loans and Turkish evidence
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (38)
Curtis, M. C. 2010. Xhorxh,
xhuxhmaxhuxh and the
xhaxhallerë: The xenophonemic status of
Albanian
/xh/. Balkanistica 23: 67–96.
Faye, C. U. 1923–5. The
influence of “Hlonipa” on the Zulu
clicks. Bulletin of the
School of Oriental and African
Studies 3: 757–782.
Fischer, O. 2011. Cognitive
iconic grounding of reduplication in
language. In Semblance
and Signification, Michelucci, P., Fischer, O., & Ljungberg, C. (eds), 55–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fónagy, I. 1999. Why
iconicity? In Form
Miming Meaning, Nänny, M. & Fischer, O. (eds), 3–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2001. Languages
within Language. An Evolutive
Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins,
2006. The
Balkans as a linguistic
area. In Elsevier
Encyclopedia of Language and
Linguistics, vol. 1, K. Brown (ed.), 657–72. Oxford: Elsevier.
1990b. The
relative markedness of click sounds: Evidence from language
change, acquisition, and
avoidance. Anthropological
Linguistics 32: 120–138.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J. 1994. Introduction:
Sound symbolic
processes. In Sound
Symbolism, Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (eds), 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hock, H. H. & Joseph, B. D. 1996/2009. Language
Change, Language History, and Language Relationship. An
Introduction to Historical
Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (1st edn., 1996; 2nd
edn., 2009).
Householder, F. W., Kazazis, K., & Koutsoudas, A. 1964. Reference
Grammar of Literary
Dhimotiki. (International
Journal of American Linguistics 30:
2/Publication 31 of the Indiana University Research Center
in Anthropology, Folklore, and
Linguistics.) Bloomington: Indiana University.
Joseph, B. D. 1982. Ya
tin idieteri θesi tu [ts]/[dz] stin eliniki fonologia [On
the special status of [ts]/[dz] in Greek
phonology]. Studies in Greek
Linguistics. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the
Department of Linguistics, Aristotelian University of
Thessaloniki, 1982
[1985], 227–235. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
1983. Language
use in the Balkans – The contributions of historical
linguistics. Anthropological
Linguistics 25: 275–287.
1984. Balkan
expressive and affective phonology – The case of Greek
ts/dz. In Papers
for the V. Congress of Southeast European Studies (Belgrade,
September 1984), Shangriladze, K. and Townsend, E. (eds), 227–237. Slavica Publishers (for the US National Committee of the AIESEE).
1987. On
the use of iconic elements in etymological investigation:
Some case studies from
Greek. Diachronica 4: 1–26.
1994. Modern
Greek ts: Beyond sound
symbolism. In Sound
Symbolism, L. Hinton, Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (eds), 222–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1997. On
the linguistics of marginality: The centrality of the
periphery. In Papers
from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, Anderson, G.,
et al.
(eds), 197–213. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kazazis, K. 1972. The
status of Turkisms in the present-day Balkan
languages. In Aspects
of the Balkans: Continuity and Change. Contributions to the
International Balkan Conference Held at UCLA, October
23–28, 1969, Birnbaum, H. & Vryonis, Jr., S. (eds), 87–116. The Hague: Mouton.
Klamer, M. 2002. Semantically
motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera
expressives. Language 78: 258–286.
Lorendzatos, P. 1923. Simvoli
is ta neoelinika
paronimia. Leksikografikon
arxion tis mesis ke neas
elnikis 6: 40–71.
Mitchell, D. 2019. Verbal
-s in AAVE: Affect, Aspect, Dialectology, and
Perceptions. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Mithun, M. 1982. The
synchronic and diachronic behavior of plops, squeaks,
croaks, sighs and
moans. International Journal
of American
Linguistics 48: 49–58.
Preston, D. 2003. Language
with an
attitude. In Handbook
of Language Variation and
Change, Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds), Chap.
2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sadowski, P. 2001. The
sound as echo to the sense: The iconicity of English
gl-
words. In The
Motivated Sign, Fischer, O. & Nänny, M. (eds), 69–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Samuels, M. 1972. Linguistic
Evolution, with Special Reference to
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shinohara, K. & Kawahara, S. 2010. A
cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of
size. Berkeley Linguistics
Society
2010, 396–410. (, published
by the Linguistic Society of
America.)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Flaksman, Maria
2025. Iconic words as a peripheral (lexical) group. In The Diachrony of Word Class Peripheries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 238], ► pp. 206 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
