Cover not available

In:Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 105122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (38)
References
Curtis, M. C. 2010. Xhorxh, xhuxhmaxhuxh and the xhaxhallerë: The xenophonemic status of Albanian /xh/. Balkanistica 23: 67–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, F. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faye, C. U. 1923–5. The influence of “Hlonipa” on the Zulu clicks. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 3: 757–782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, O. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Semblance and Signification, Michelucci, P., Fischer, O., & Ljungberg, C. (eds), 55–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. 1999. Why iconicity? In Form Miming Meaning, Nänny, M. & Fischer, O. (eds), 3–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. 2002. Macedonian (LOM/117). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. The Balkans as a linguistic area. In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 1, K. Brown (ed.), 657–72. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. & Joseph, B. D. 2020. The Balkan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K. 1990a. Hlonipha and the ambiguous woman. Anthropos 85: 455–473.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990b. The relative markedness of click sounds: Evidence from language change, acquisition, and avoidance. Anthropological Linguistics 32: 120–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J. 1994. Introduction: Sound symbolic processes. In Sound Symbolism, Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (eds), 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. & Joseph, B. D. 1996/2009. Language Change, Language History, and Language Relationship. An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (1st edn., 1996; 2nd edn., 2009).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Householder, F. W., Kazazis, K., & Koutsoudas, A. 1964. Reference Grammar of Literary Dhimotiki. (International Journal of American Linguistics 30: 2/Publication 31 of the Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D. 1982. Ya tin idieteri θesi tu [ts]/[dz] stin eliniki fonologia [On the special status of [ts]/[dz] in Greek phonology]. Studies in Greek Linguistics. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, 1982 [1985], 227–235. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983. Language use in the Balkans – The contributions of historical linguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 25: 275–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984. Balkan expressive and affective phonology – The case of Greek ts/dz. In Papers for the V. Congress of Southeast European Studies (Belgrade, September 1984), Shangriladze, K. and Townsend, E. (eds), 227–237. Slavica Publishers (for the US National Committee of the AIESEE).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Modern Greek ts: Beyond sound symbolism. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (eds), 222–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. On the linguistics of marginality: The centrality of the periphery. In Papers from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Anderson, G., et al. (eds), 197–213. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kazazis, K. 1972. The status of Turkisms in the present-day Balkan languages. In Aspects of the Balkans: Continuity and Change. Contributions to the International Balkan Conference Held at UCLA, October 23–28, 1969, Birnbaum, H. & Vryonis, Jr., S. (eds), 87–116. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klamer, M. 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78: 258–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorendzatos, P. 1923. Simvoli is ta neoelinika paronimia. Leksikografikon arxion tis mesis ke neas elnikis 6: 40–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, H. 1953. Die Bildung der lautsymbolischen Wörter im Türkischen. Oriens 6: 50–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1982. Prosodic structure and expletive infixation. Language 63: 574–590 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirambel, A. 1959. La langue grecque moderne: description et analyse. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. 2019. Verbal -s in AAVE: Affect, Aspect, Dialectology, and Perceptions. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, M. 1982. The synchronic and diachronic behavior of plops, squeaks, croaks, sighs and moans. International Journal of American Linguistics 48: 49–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmark, L. 1998. Oxford Albanian-English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in western North America. Language 47: 826–848. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preston, D. 2003. Language with an attitude. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (eds), Chap. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadowski, P. 2001. The sound as echo to the sense: The iconicity of English gl- words. In The Motivated Sign, Fischer, O. & Nänny, M. (eds), 69–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuels, M. 1972. Linguistic Evolution, with Special Reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shinohara, K. & Kawahara, S. 2010. A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. Berkeley Linguistics Society 2010, 396–410. (, published by the Linguistic Society of America.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact, Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wescott, R. 1975. Allolinguistics: Exploring the peripheries of speech. In The Second LACUS Forum, Reich, P. (ed), 497–513. Columbia: The Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Flaksman, Maria
2025. Iconic words as a peripheral (lexical) group. In The Diachrony of Word Class Peripheries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 238],  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue