In:Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 57–74
Morphosyntactic integration of ideophones in Japanese and Korean
A corpus-based analysis of spoken and written discourse
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.04par
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.04par
Abstract
This study explores how the morphosyntactic integration
of ideophones differs between two registers of two ideophone-rich
languages, Japanese and Korean. Previous studies have demonstrated
that the iconicity and expressive power of ideophones in spoken
language are inversely correlated with their degree of grammatical
integration. Drawing on corpus data from spoken and written Japanese
and Korean, this paper argues that the morphosyntactic integration
of ideophones as measured by their verbalizability is greater (i) in
non-auditory domains than in the auditory domain, (ii) in spoken
than written discourse, and (iii) in Korean than in Japanese.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Ideophones grammar in Japanese and Korean
- 2.1Morphosyntax of Japanese ideophones
- 2.2Morphosyntax of Korean ideophones
- 3.Method
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Semantic types: Phonomimes vs. phenomimes
- 4.2Text styles: Spoken vs. written discourse
- 5.Concluding remarks
Abbreviations Notes References Data sources
References (39)
Akita, K. 2009. A
Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical
Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of
Mimetics. PhD dissertation, Kobe University.
2013. The
lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical
correlates. In Iconic
Investigations [Iconicity in
Language and
Literature 12]. L. Elleström, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds), 331–349. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2017. The
linguistic integration of Japanese ideophones and its
typological
implications. Canadian
Journal of
Linguistics 62: 314–334.
Atoda, T. and Hosino, K. 1993. Giseigo/Gitaigo
Tukai-kata Ziten (‘Usage guide to
the phonomimes and phenomimes of
Japanese’). Tokyo: Sotakusya.
Chae, Wan.
2003. Uysege/ethaye-uy
thongsa-wa uymi (‘The syntax and semantics of phonomimes and
phenomimes’). Say-kwuke
Saynghwal 3(2): 54–72.
Childs, G. T. 1994. African
ideophones. In Sound
Symbolism. L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohara (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dhoorre, C. S. and Tosco, M. 1998. 111
Somali ideophones. Journal of
African Cultural
Studies 11(2): 125–156.
Dingemanse, M. and Akita, K. 2017. An
inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical
integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones,
with reference to
Japanese. Journal of
Linguistics 53: 501–532.
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The
Meaning and Use of Ideophones in
Siwu. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
2017. Expressiveness
and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with
special reference to
Siwu. STUF: Language Typology
and
Universals 70: 363–384.
Ito, M. 2015. Onomatope+Suru-no
Goiteki-Imi-to Asupeku-Tosei-no Kenkyuu (‘A study of the
lexical meanings and aspectuality of mimetic
verbs’). PhD dissertation, Kyushu University.
Jung, In-Sung. 1938. Ekam-phyohyen-sang
cosene-uy thukcing-in moumcohwa-pepchik- kwa
caumkasey-pepchik (Vocalic and consonantal sound symbolism
of
Korean). Hankul 6(9): 419–434.
Kageyama, T. 2007. Explorations
in the conceptual semantics of mimetic
verbs. In Current
Issues in the history and Structure of
Japanese, B. Frellesvig, M. Shibatani and J. Smith (eds), 27–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I. and Schourup, L. 1996. Dictionary
of Iconic Expressions in
Japanese [Trends in Linguistics
Documentation 12]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kim, In-Hwa. 1995. Hyentay
Hankwuke-uy Umsengsangcinge
Yenkwu (A study on the lexicon
exhibiting phonetic sound symbolism in modern
Korean), PhD dissertation, Ehwa Womans Universiy.
Kobayasi, H. 1933. Kokugo
syootyoogo-no kenkyuu (‘The study of sound symbolic words in
Japanese’). Bungaku 1: 1313–1359.
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds
like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and
Cognition in Pastaza
Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ono, M. eds. 2007. Giongo/Gitaigo
4500: Nihongo Onomatope
Ziten (‘Ideophones 4500: A
dictionary of Japanese
onomatopoeia’). Tokyo: Shogakukan.
Park, Dong-Gun. 1997. Hyentay
Hankwuke Hyungnaymal-uy
Yenkwu (‘A study of sound
symbolic words in modern
Korean’). PhD dissertation, Konkuk University.
. 2015. Hankwuke
uysenge-wa uythaye-uy umwun pikyo (‘A phonological
comparison between onomatopoetic and imitative words of
Korean’). Hanmal
Yenkwu 37: 177–203.
Shin, Jung-Jin. 1998. Hyentay
Hankwuke Uysenguythaye Yenkwu (‘A study of mimetics in
Modern Korean’). MA thesis, Seoul National University.
. 2015. Uysenguythayseng
yongen-uy nonhang-kwuco-wa ca-/thatongseng yangsang (‘A
study on the argument structure of onomatopoeic
verbs’). Korean Language and
Culture 56: 135–160.
Shon, Dal-Im. 2012. Hyentaykwuke
Uysenguythaye-uy Hyengthay-wa Umwun Yenkwu (‘A study on the
morphological and phonological characteristics of
onomatopoeia in modern
Korean’). PhD. dissertation, Ehwa Womans University.
National
Institute of Korean Language: Republic of
Korea. Phyocwun Kwuke
Taysacen (Standard Korean
Dictionary).
Tamori, I. and Schourup, L. 1999. Onomatope:
Keitai-to Imi (‘Onomatopoeia: Form
and
meaning’). Tokyo: Kurosio.
Tamori, I. 1993. Nihongo
onomatope-no toogo-hantyuu (‘Syntactic categories of
Japanese
onomatopoeia’). In Onomatopia:
Gion-/Gitaigo-no
Rakuen (‘Onomatopoeia: A utopia of
mimetics’), H. Kakehi and I. Tamori (eds), 17–75. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.
Tannen, D. 1980. Spoken/Written Language and the Oral/Literate Continuum. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 207-218.
1983. Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Discourse. In Literacy for life: The demand for reading and writing, R. W. Bailey & R. M. Fosheim (eds), 79-96. New York: The Modern Language Association.
Toratani, K. 2015. Iconicity
in the syntax and lexical semantics of sound-symbolic words
in
Japanese. In Iconicity:
East meets West [Iconicity in
Language and
Literature 14], M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara and K. Akita (eds), 125–141. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2013. The
role of sound-symbolic forms in motion event descriptions:
The case of Japanese. Review
of Cognitive
Linguistics 10: 90–132.
Tsujimura, N. 2005. A
constructional approach to mimetic
verbs. In Grammatical
Constructions: Back to the
Roots, M. Fried and H. C. Boas (eds), 137–154. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2014. Mimetic verbs and meaning. In Morphology and meaning, F. Rainer, F. Gardani, H. C. Luschützky & W. H. Dressler (eds), 303-314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aozora Bunko
Corpus. <[URL]> (19
November 2017).
Nagoya University
Conversation Corpus. <[URL]> (19
November 2017).
SJ-RIKS Corpus ext.
(Sejong-Research Institute of Korean Studies Corpus
extension). <[URL]> (19
November 2017).
Fujimura, I. Chakoshi. <[URL]> (19
November 2017).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
