In:Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 21–38
The relationship between iconicity and systematicity in Korean ideophones
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.02kwo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.02kwo
Abstract
This chapter investigates the relationship between two
forms of non-arbitrariness in Korean ideophones: relative iconicity,
which is a resemblance-based mapping between relations among
multiple forms and relations among multiple meanings (exemplified by
paradigmatic consonantal symbolism), and systematicity, which is a
statistical regularities-based mapping between form and meaning
(exemplified by ideophonic vowel harmony). Using a written corpus of
Korean ideophones, the present study quantifies the number of
variants in consonantal constellations, where larger constellations
are judged to have a higher degree of relative iconicity than
smaller constellations. The results reveal that larger
constellations are more susceptible to the influence exerted by
vowel harmony. This language-internal finding suggests a tight
correlation between relative iconicity and systematicity, and allows
further investigation into its generalizability from a broad
typological perspective.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Relative iconicity and systematicity in Korean ideophones
- 3.A summary of Kwon’s (2018) corpus-based study of Korean ideophones
- 4.The present study
- 4.1Iconicity levels involved in paradigmatic consonantal symbolism
- 4.2Distribution of consonantal symbolism in Korean ideophones
- 4.3Main analysis
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (43)
Akita, K. 2009. A
grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical
approaches to iconic and lexical properties of
mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation. Kobe University.
Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological
productivity [Cambridge Studies in
Linguistics 95]. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F. and Christiansen, M. H. 2016. “Sound-meaning
association biases evidenced across thousands of
languages”. Proceedings of
the National Academy of
Sciences 113(39): 10818–10823.
Bybee, L. J, Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W. 1994. The
evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the
languages of the
world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Dingemanse, M. 2011. “Ezra
Pound among the Mawu: ideophones and iconicity in
Siwu”, In Semblance
and signification, P. Michelucci, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds.), 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2015. “Ideophones
and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the
interpretation of repeated talk in
discourse”. Studies in
Language 39(4): 946–970.
Dingemanse, M. Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H. and Monaghan, P. 2015. “Arbitrariness,
iconicity, and systematicity in
language”. Trends in
Cognitive
Sciences 19(10): 603–615.
Fordyce, J. F. 1988. Studies
in sound symbolism with special reference to
English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
Frishberg, N. 1975. “Arbitrariness
and iconicity: historical change in American sign
language”. Language 51: 676–710.
Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N. and Hockema, S. 2010. “Iconicity
in expressives: An empirical
investigation”. In Experimental
and Empirical Methods in the Study of Conceptual Structure,
Discourse, and Language, S. Rice and J. Newman (eds.), 163–180. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Hays, B and Londe Z. C. 2006. “Stochastic
phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel
harmony”. Phonology 23: 59–104.
Kelly, M. H. 1992. “Using
sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in
grammatical category
assignments”. Psychological
Review 99(2): 349–364.
Kim, C.-W. 1965. “On
the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification
(with special reference to Korean
stops)”. Word 21(3): 339–359.
Kwon, N. 2014. “Iconicity
in Korean consonantal
symbolism”. In Proceedings
of the 15th Australasian International Conference on Speech
Science and Technology, J. Hay and E. Parnell (eds.), 176–179. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
Kwon, N. 2016. “Empirically
observed iconicity levels of English
phonaesthemes”, Public
Journal of
Semiotics 7(2): 73–93.
2017. “Total
reduplication in Japanese ideophones: An exercise in
localized canonical
typology”. Glossa: A Journal
of General
Linguistics 2(1): 40, 1–31.
2018. “Iconicity
correlated with vowel harmony in Korean
ideophones”. Laboratory
Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory
Phonology 9(1): 1, 1–18.
Kwon, N. and Masuda, K. 2019. "On the ordering of elements in ideophonic echo-words versus prosaic dvandva words, with special reference to Japanese and Korean". Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28(1): 29-53.
Kwon, N. to
appear. “A theoretical
extension of Ohala’s frequency code
hypothesis”. In Sound
symbolism in the history of
thought, L. Nobile (ed). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
in
prep. “An experimental
investigation on the correlation between type frequency and
iconicity in Korean
ideophones”. m.s.
Larsen, D. and Heinz, J. 2012. “Neutral
vowels in sound-symbolic vowel harmony in
Korean”. Phonology 29: 433–464.
Lee, J. S. 1992. Phonology
and sound symbolism of Korean
ideophones. Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University.
Lockwood, G. and Dingemanse, M. 2015. Iconicity
in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and
neuroimaging research into
sound-symbolism. Frontiers in
Psychology 6:1246.
McCarthy, J. J. 1983. “Phonological
features and morphological
structure”. Papers from the
Parasessions, Chicago Linguistic
Society 19: 135–161.
McFarland, T. 2010. “Ideophones
and templatic morphology in
Totonac”, In Rara
& rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic
diversity, J. Wohlgemuth and M. Cysouw (eds.), 235–246. Berline: Mouton de Gruyter.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N. 2007. “The
phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis:
Cross-linguistic evidence in language
acquisition”. Cognitive
Psychology 55(4): 259–305.
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S. 2014. “How
arbitrary is
language?”. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society
B 369(1651):
20130299.
Ohala, J. 1994. “The
frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of
voice-pitch”. In Sound
Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. and Vigliocco, G. 2010. “Iconicity
as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and
signed languages”. Frontiers
in
psychology 1: 227.
Perniss, P. and Vigliocco, G. 2014. The
bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the
experience of
language. Philosophical
Transactions of Royal Society
B 369 (1651): 20130300.
10.1098/rstb.2013.0300
Sohn, T.-I. 2012. Hyentaykwuke
uysenguytayeuy hyengtaywa umwun yenkwu [Morphological and
phonological analyses of ideophones in Modern
Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation. Ihwa Women’s University.
Svantesson, J. O. 2017. “Sound
symbolism: the role of word sound in
meaning”. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive
Science 8(5): e01441.
10.1002/wcs.1441
