In:Iconicity: East meets West
Edited by Masako K. Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara and Kimi Akita
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 14] 2015
► pp. 93–108
Synaesthetic sound iconicity
Phonosemantic associations between acoustic features of phonemes and emotional behavior
Published online: 12 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.14.05aur
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.14.05aur
This paper reports results from an empirical study in synaesthetic sound iconicity, a specific form of phonosemantics defined as implicit and systematic associations of acoustic features of phonemes with non-acoustic phenomena. I argue that acoustic features of phonemes are implicitly associated with one pole or the other (e.g., high level or low level) of bipolar semantic concepts such as activity or dominance. Based on this assumption, it was hypothesized that pseudo-words consisting of plosive consonants and back vowels are associated with the emotion of anger, whereas pseudo-words consisting of sonorant consonants and front vowels are associated with the emotion of fear. This hypothesis was tested in an experimental setting, applying a speeded classification paradigm.
References (65)
Ahlner, F. & Zlatev, J. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38(1–4): 298–348.
Algoe, S.B. & Haidt, J. 2009. Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology 4(2): 105–127.
Allott, R. 1995. Sound symbolism. In Language in the Würm Glaciation, U.L. Figge (ed), 15–38. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Auracher, J. 2013. Synaesthetic sound iconicity: Cross-modal integration of acoustic aspects of speech with non-acoustic aspects of meaning. Poster presentation at the 23rd annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse in Valencia, Spain.
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G. & Stavniychuk, T. 2011. P is for happiness, N is for sadness: Universals in sound iconicity to detect emotions in poetry. Discourse Processes 48(1): 1–25.
Azevedo, T.M., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L., Rodrigues, E.C., Oliveira, J.M., Oliveira, L.F., Lutterbach, L.G. & Vargas, C.D. 2005. A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology 42(3): 255–260.
Berlin, B. 1994. Evidence for pervasive synesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J.J. Ohala (eds), 76–103. Cambridge: CUP.
Bremner, A.J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K.J. & Spence, C. 2013. ‘Bouba’ and ‘Kiki’ in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition 126(2): 165–172.
Collier, G.L. 1996. Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli. Motivation and Emotion 20(1): 1–32.
Crisinel, A.S. & Spence, C. 2009. Implicit association between basic tastes and pitch. Neuroscience Letters 464: 39–42.
Darwin, C. 1965[1872]. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Davis, R. 1961. The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology 52: 259–268.
Ertel, S. 1969. Psychophonetik: Untersuchungen über Lautsymbolik und Motivation. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Evans, K.K. & Treisman, A. 2010. Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. Journal of Vision 10(1): 1–12.
Gallace, A. & Spence, C. 2006. Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size. Perception and Psychophysics 68(7): 1191–1203.
Greenberg, J.H. & Jenkins, J.J. 1966. Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English, III and IV. Word 22(1–3): 207–242.
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E. & Schwartz, J.K.L. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1464–1480.
Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A. & Banaji, M.R. 2003. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(2): 197–216.
Heise, D.R. 1970. The semantic differential and attitude research. In Attitude Measurement, G.F. Summers (ed.), 235–253. Chicago IL: Rand McNally.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J.J. 1994. Introduction: Sound–symbolism processes. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, J.J. Ohala (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.
von Humboldt, W. 1836. Über die Kawi-Sprache auf der Insel Java: Nebst einer Einleitung über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechtes, Vol. 1. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Jespersen, O. 1933. Symbolic value of the vowel I. In Linguistica; Selected Papers in English, French, and German, 283–303. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaad.
Kantartzis, K. 2011. Children and Adults’ Understanding and Use of Sound Symbolism in Novel Words. PhD dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Klink, R.R. 2000. Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters 11(1): 5–20.
Levenson, R.W. 1994. The search for autonomic specificity. In The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions, P. Ekman & R.J. Davidson (eds), 252–257. Oxford: OUP.
Lewis, M. 2008. Self-conscious emotions. In Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn, M. Lewis & J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds), 742–756. New York NY: Guilford Press.
Lewkowicz, D.J. & Turkewitz, G. 1980. Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory–visual intensity matching. Developmental Psychology 16: 597–607.
Lindauer, M.S. 1990. The meanings of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma
. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28(1): 47–50.
Marks, L.E. 1978. The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations among the Modalities. New York NY: Academic Press.
. 2004. Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification. In The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, G. Calvert, C. Spence & B. Stein (eds), 85–105. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Maurer, D., Pathman, T. & Mondloch, C. 2006. The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science 9(3): 316–322.
Miron, M.S. 1961. A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62(3): 623–630.
Morton, E.W. 1977. On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. American Naturalist 111: 855–869.
. 1994. Sound symbolism and its role in non-human bertebrate communication. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J.J. Ohala, 348–365. Cambridge: CUP.
Newman, S.S. 1933. Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology 45: 53–75.
Nosek, B., Greenwald, A. & Banaji, M. 2003. Understanding and using the implicit association test, II: Method, variables and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 197–216.
Osgood, C.E. 1960. The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. Behavioral Science 5(2): 146–169.
Osgood, C.E., Tannenbaum, P.H. & Suci, G.J. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M. & Vouloumanos, A. 2013. Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Children Psychology 114(2): 173–186.
Parise, C.V. & Spence, C. 2008. Synesthetic congruency modulates the temporal ventriloquism effect. Neuroscience Letters 442(3): 257–261.
. 2009. When birds of a feather flock together: Synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS 4(5): e5664.
. 2012. Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: A study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research 220(3–4): 319–333.
Plato. 1857[ca. 420 BC]. Kratylos (translated into German by Friedrich E.D. Schleiermacher). <[URL]>
Poffenberger, A.T. & Barrows, B.E. 1924. The feeling value of lines. The Journal of Applied Psychology 8(2): 187–205.
Ramachandran, V.S. & Hubbard, E.M. 2001. Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 3–34.
Reay, I.E. 1994. Sound symbolism. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 8, R.E. Asher, & J.M.Y Simpson (eds), 4064–4070. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Schwartz, C.E., Wright, C.I., Shin, L.M., Kagan, J., Whalen, P.J., McMullin, K.G., et al. 2003. Differential amygdalar response to novel versus newly familiar neutral faces: A functional MRI probe developed for studying inhibited temperament. Biological Psychiatry 53: 854–862.
Spence, C. 2011. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 73(4): 971–995.
Stevens, J.C. & Marks, L.E. 1965. Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 54: 407–411.
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. 2008. The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn, M. Lewis & J.M. Haviland-Jones (eds), 114–137. New York NY: Guilford Press.
Ultan, R. 1978. Size-sound symbolism. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 2: Phonology, J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson & E.A. Moravcsik (eds), 525–528. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Walker, P. & Smith, S. 1985. Stroop interference based on the multimodal correlates of haptic size and auditory pitch. Perception 14: 729–736.
Weierich, M.R., Wright, C.I., Negreira, A., Dickerson, B.C. & Barrett, L.F. 2010. Novelty as a dimension in the affective brain. NeuroImage 49: 2871–2878.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Kucza, Marta
Mattes, Veronika
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
