Cover not available

Article published In: Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2024) ► pp.158–192

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

When excuse me means excuse you!

On sanctioning others by ‘excusing’ oneself and relationships between form-based practices of speaking

ORCiD logo with link | Leibniz-Institute for the German Language
Published online: 10 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.24006.kut
Abstract
This article examines the use of excuse me as a practice for invoking the complainability of another person’s conduct in the service of sanctioning it as misconduct. It explores how a form that semantically expresses its speaker’s desire to be excused (excuse me) can be used to flag another person’s doings as transgressive or untoward. It is proposed that, to elucidate this puzzle, it is necessary to adopt a more holistic perspective and to incorporate other uses of the format (e.g., in other-initiated repair, as an attention-drawing device), as well as possible relationships between them, into the analysis. The paper offers a sketch of such a more holistic, integrative account. This account revolves around the idea that practices of speaking that mobilize similar or even the same linguistic resources implicate partially overlapping sets of affordances for action which link different usages together in a larger pragmatic landscape. As such, form-based practices of speaking and the various actions they can implement exhibit demonstrable relationships across different domains of use which may need to be taken into account when thinking about a practice’s fit to the action it implements. One of the key benefits of such an approach is that it allows for mapping out larger pragmatic landscapes and to move beyond the isolated description of individual practices of speaking.
Article outline
  • 1.A practice…and a puzzle
  • 2.Data and procedure
  • 3.Excuse me as a device for invoking the complainability of another’s conduct
  • 4.Excuse me in other actions
    • 4.1Other-initiations of repair
    • 4.2Mobilizing attention: Summoning and alerting
  • 5.Excuse me as excuse you! — A return to the puzzle
  • 6.Summary and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Button, G., Lynch, M., & Sharrock, W. W. (2023). A case study: Apologies and constructive analysis (Chapter 10). In Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Constructive Analysis (pp. 237–260). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 (translated and adapted for English). Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 121, 1–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2008). On assessing situations and events in conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and its relatives. Discourse Studies, 10(4), 443–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floyd, S., Rossi, G., & Enfield, N. J. (2020). Getting others to do things: A pragmatic typology of recruitments. Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order (2nd print). Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, S. (1996). The prosodic contextualization of moral work: An analysis of reproaches in ‘why’-formats. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 271–302). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2016). “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics, 951, 120–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Conversation analysis: Practices and methods. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative sociology (3rd edition) (pp. 208–230). SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 881, 88–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., Raymond, C. W., & Drew, P. (2019). Constructing apologies: Reflexive relationships between apologies and offenses. Journal of Pragmatics, 1421, 185–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, E. M., Hömke, P., Löfgren, E., Neumann, T., Schuerman, W. L., & Kendrick, K. H. (2020). Using expletive insertion to pursue and sanction in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, josl.12439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstetter, E. (2020). Thinking with the Body: Embodying Thinking as a Practice in Board Games. In S. Wiggins & K. Osvaldsson Cromdal (Eds.), Discursive Psychology and Embodiment (pp. 247–273). Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keisanen, T. (2007). Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. (pp. 253–281). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics, 1(1), 164–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornfeld, L., Küttner, U.-A., & Zinken, J. (2023). Ein Korpus für die vergleichende Interaktionsforschung. In A. Deppermann, C. Fandrych, M. Kupietz, & T. Schmidt (Eds.), Korpora in der germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft (pp. 103–128). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornfeld, L., & Rossi, G. (2023). Enforcing rules during play: Knowledge, agency, and the design of instructions and reminders. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 56(1), 42–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Küttner, U.-A. (2019). At the intersection of stance-management and repair: Meta-pragmatic claims as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses. Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 201, 115–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Retro-sequence. In A. Gubina, E. M. Hoey, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Terminology for Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. International Society for Conversation Analysis (ISCA). [URL]
Küttner, U.-A., & Ehmer, O. (2024). Affordances and Actions: Requests for Confirmation as Devices for Implementing Challenging and Other Disagreement — Implicative Actions. Contrastive Pragmatics, 5(1–2), 27–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Küttner, U.-A., Kornfeld, L., Mack, C., Mondada, L., Rogowska, J., Rossi, G., Sorjonen, M.-L., Weidner, M., & Zinken, J. (2024). Introducing the “Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction” (PECII) — A novel resource for exploring cross-situational and cross-linguistic variability in social interaction. In M. Selting & D. Barth-Weingarten (Eds.), New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research (pp. 132–160). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Küttner, U.-A., Kornfeld, L., & Zinken, J. (2023). A coding scheme for (dis)approval-relevant events involving the direct social sanctioning of problematic behavior in informal social interaction. Online-Only Publikationen Des Leibniz-Instituts Für Deutsche Sprache, 51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Küttner, U.-A., Vatanen, A., & Zinken, J. (2022). Invoking rules in everyday family interactions: A method for appealing to practical reason. Human Studies, 45(4), 793–823. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Küttner, U.-A., & Zinken, J. (frthc.). The structure of normative moments: Dealing with actual or potential socio-normative trouble in ordinary social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly.
Mondada, L. (2019). Multimodal transcription. [URL]
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2004). The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 291–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 73(2), 137–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In A. J. Wootton & P. Drew (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. A. S. Elinor Ochs & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 499–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). On complainability. Social Problems, 52(4), 449–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair initiation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 231–270). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Barnes, R. (2013). Alternative, subsequent descriptions. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 322–342). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, M. S., & Seuren, L. M. (2022). Re-apprehending misapprehensions: A practice for disclosing troubles in understanding in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 1931, 43–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sterponi, L. (2003). Account episodes in family discourse: The making of morality in everyday interaction. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 79–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, C. (2008, October 11). ‘Language Timothy!’ (The catchphrase of a generation). The Dreaming Armadillo. [URL]
Zinken, J., & Küttner, U.-A. (2022). Offering an Interpretation of Prior Talk in Everyday Interaction: A Semantic Map Approach. Discourse Processes, 59(4), 298–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue