Article published In: Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2024) ► pp.257–283
Indexing pragmatic functions of kiss-teeth through embodiment and viewpoint construction
Insights from a Surinamese participant
Published online: 10 December 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.24003.sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.24003.sch
Abstract
Everyday discourse involves interpreting composite utterances like speech-with-gesture composites. Taking a
multimodal and discourse-pragmatic perspective, this single-case study explores the complexity of meaning-making by considering
the interweaving of gesture-speech composites and discursive strategies in talk-in-interaction. Specifically, the paper examines
various pragmatic functions of kiss-teeth (i.e., a conventionalised sound gesture) when combining it with other multimodal
resources. The data for this study was derived from an interview conducted during ethnographic fieldwork in Suriname in 2022. The
results show that kiss-teeth has several discourse-pragmatic functions in various contexts, including (1) conveying a reprimand,
(2) participating in flirtatious teasing and (3) engaging in gossip. While the research suggests that the meaning of kiss-teeth is
closely tied to various multimodal resources, the study also considers the participant’s uses of viewpoint constructions for
perspective-taking in demonstrations of kiss-teeth as diverse social actions. The analysis illustrates that the participant
indexes distinct gesture functions through viewpoint constructions which rely on descriptions, depictions, and composite
utterances. By analysing viewpoint construction, the study does not only aim to scrutinise the gesture’s meanings but also how
kiss-teeth contributes to the interaction as a whole. Ultimately, the findings point to the importance of gesture-speech
composites and narrative discourse strategies in talk-in-interaction.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Making sense of embodiment in interaction
- 2.1Kiss-teeth and its functions
- 2.2Composite utterances and viewpoint constructions
- 3.Data and methods
- 3.1Participants, instruments and procedure
- 3.2Transcription, annotation and interview methods
- 4.Analysis of kiss-teeth and viewpoint in enactment, meta-talk and narrative discourse
- 4.1Exploring kiss-teeth: Forms, functions, and discursive strategies in talk-in-interaction
- 4.1.1Using kiss-teeth for reprimanding
- 4.1.2Using kiss-teeth for flirtatious teasing
- 4.1.3Using kiss-teeth for gossiping
- 4.2Key observations from the analysis
- 4.1Exploring kiss-teeth: Forms, functions, and discursive strategies in talk-in-interaction
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (36)
Billig, M. (1999a). Conversation
Analysis and the Claims of Naivety. Discourse &
Society, 10(4), 572–576.
(1999b). Whose
Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis. Discourse &
Society, 10(4), 543–558.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied
sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics (1st
ed., pp. 173–198). Cambridge University Press.
Debreslioska, S., Özyürek, A., Gullberg, M., & Perniss, P. (2013). Gestural
Viewpoint Signals Referent Accessibility. Discourse
Processes, 50(7), 431–456.
ELAN (Version 6.2) [Computer
software]. (2021). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics,
The Language Archive. Retrieved from [URL]
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The
Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances (1st
ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ferrara, L., & Hodge, G. (2018). Language
as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in
Psychology, 91, 716.
Figueroa, E. (2005). Rude
sounds: Kiss Teeth and negotiation of the public sphere. In S. Muehleisen & B. Migge (Eds.), Politeness
and face in Caribbean
creoles (pp. 73–99). John Benjamins.
Goodwin, M. H., & Alim, H. S. (2010). “Whatever
(Neck Roll, Eye Roll, Teeth Suck)”: The Situated Coproduction of Social Categories and Identities through Stancetaking and
Transmodal Stylization: Whatever (Neck Roll, Eye Roll, Teeth Suck). Journal of Linguistic
Anthropology, 20(1), 179–194.
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2012). The
Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis (1st
ed., pp. 57–76). Wiley.
Holler, J. (2022). Visual
bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 377(1859), 20210094.
Hollington, A. (2017). Emotions
in Jamaican: African conceptualizations, emblematicity and multimodality in discourse and public
spaces. In A. Storch (Ed.), Culture
and Language
Use (Vol. 191, pp. 81–104). John Benjamins.
Janzen, T. (2017). Composite
utterances in a signed language: Topic constructions and perspective-taking in ASL. Cognitive
Linguistics, 28(3), 511–538.
Jewitt, C. (2016). Multimodal
analysis. In A. Geōrgakopoúlou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of language and digital
communication (pp. 69–84). Routledge.
Koefoed, G., & Jadoenandansing, S. (1993). Surinamese
languages. In G. Extra & L. T. Verhoeven (Eds.), Community
languages in the Netherlands (1st
ed., pp. 51–67). Swets & Zeitlinger.
Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal
discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold; Oxford University Press.
Kurz, K. B., Mullaney, K., & Occhino, C. (2019). Constructed
Action in American Sign Language: A Look at Second Language Learners in a Second
Modality. Languages, 4(4), 90.
Mittelberg, I. (2017). Experiencing
and construing spatial artifacts from within: Simulated artifact immersion as a multimodal viewpoint
strategy. Cognitive
Linguistics, 28(3), 381–415.
Mohr, S., & Bauer, A. (2022). Gesture,
sign languages and multimodality. In S. Völkel & N. Nassenstein (Eds.), Approaches
to Language and
Culture (pp. 159–196). De Gruyter.
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges
of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366.
(2002b). The
Meaning of Kiss-teeth. Black Language in the U.S. and Caribbean: Education, History, Structure,
and Use, 1–42.
Quinto-Pozos, D. (2014). Enactment
as a (signed) language communicative strategy. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Handbücher
zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK)
38/2 (pp. 2163–2169). DE GRUYTER.
Rickford, J. R., & Rickford, A. E. (1976). Cut-Eye
and Suck-Teeth: African Words and Gestures in New World Guise. The Journal of American
Folklore, 89(353), 294.
Schnellinger, T. (2024). A
multimodal perspective on communicative competence in multilingual Afro-Surinamese speaker
communities. In S. Mohr & L. Ferrara (Eds.), Learning
Languages, Being
Social (pp. 111–146). De Gruyter.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A
Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in
Society, 5(1), 1–23. [URL]
Shun-chiu, Y. (1992). Six
Characters in Search of a Gesture: Chinese Graphs and Corporal
Behavior. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Advances
in Non-Verbal Communication: Chinese Graphs in Corporal
Behavior (pp. 163–186). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating
Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments. Research on Language & Social
Interaction, 39(4), 377–409.
Streeck, J., Grothues, J., & Villanueva, J. (2009). Gesturecraft:
The manu-facture of meaning. John Benjamins Pub.
