Cover not available

Article published In: Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2024) ► pp.193–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Grounding lists

Building common ground as a multimodal practice in interaction

ORCiD logo with link | University of Basel
ORCiD logo with link | Heidelberg University
ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Published online: 20 December 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.24002.dan
Abstract
Drawing on findings from three distinct corpora encompassing interactions in Spanish, Portuguese, and German, this study investigates the role of lists as strategic devices employed by interlocutors in everyday storytellings and positioning activities to establish common ground (CG). Termed ‘grounding lists’, our research identifies them as a distinct communicative practice for dynamically co-building CG. We found three domains to be most relevant in our data: (a) Personal CG emerging from biographically shared experiences, (b) Communal CG emerging from shared cultural knowledge, and (c) Communal CG emerging from shared everyday knowledge. Our findings reveal the primary characteristics of grounding lists being stylized prosody, reduced itemization, general extenders, lexical elements or quotatives in the onset projecting generalizability, early affiliation, reported speech, as well as gestural depiction. Through empirical analysis, we demonstrate the extent to which each type of CG aligns with these identified features of grounding lists and highlight that it is particularly the dominant use of the list as an abstract gestalt, less as a sedimented practice in itself, that defines grounding lists. This kind of list is strongly marked by its gestalt projection, enabling intersubjectivity and co-building of CG through animated speech and gestural enactment.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.State of the art
    • 2.1Lists in interaction
    • 2.2From common ground to lists
  • 3.Methodological procedure
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1CG emerging from biographically or immediate shared experiences
      • 4.1.1Sequence “Pensar em português”
      • 4.1.2Sequence “Aquí al lado”
      • 4.1.3Sequence “Paseo”
    • 4.2CG emerging from shared cultural knowledge
      • 4.2.1Sequence “Ey Du”
      • 4.2.2Sequence “Con mi familia”
    • 4.3CG emerging from shared everyday knowledge
      • 4.3.1Sequence “Gafitas”
      • 4.3.2Sequence “Grupo”
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Symbols used in transcripts
  • Bibliography
References (35)
Bibliography
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barotto, A., & Mauri, C. (2018). Constructing lists to construct categories. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 30(1), 95–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, M. (2022). General extenders in spanish interactions: frequent forms, pragmatic functions y todo eso. Anuari De Filologia. Estudis De Lingüística, 12(12), 155–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bücker, J. (2009). Quotativ-Konstruktionen mit ‘Motto’ als Ressourcen für Selbst- und Fremdpositionierungen. In S. Günthner & J. Bücker (Eds.), Grammatik im Gespräch: Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung (pp. 215–247). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carneiro Mendes, M. (2019). As expressões “tipo”, “assim”, “tipo assim” e “assim tipo” e suas funções nas falas de uma interação em grupo. In U. Schröder & M. Carneiro Mendes. (Eds.). Comunicação (Inter)Cultural em Interação (Vol. 11) (pp. 207–222). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (2008 [1996]). Using language (8th printing ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. English translation and adaptation of Selting, Margret et al. 2009: Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2. Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 121, 1–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional Linguistics — Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dankel, P., & Satti, I. (2019). Multimodale Listen. Form und Funktion körperlicher Ressourcen in Aufzählungen in französischen, spanischen und italienischen Interaktionen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 70(1), 58–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dankel, P., & Soto, R. M. (2018). Patrones prosódicos en construcciones enumerativas — una visión desde la perspectiva del contacto Español — Quechua. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana. Vervuert, 32(2), 35–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A., & Schmitt, R. (2008). Verstehensdokumentationen: Zur Phänomenologie von Verstehen in der Interaktion. Deutsche Sprache, 36(3), 220–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressel, D., Dankel, P., & Teixeira Kalkhoff, A. M. (2023). What can collaboratively produced lists tell us about constructions? A multimodal analysis of co-constructed enumeration practices in spoken Spanish. In I. Hennecke & E. Wiesinger (Eds.), Constructions in Spanish (pp. 340–374). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehmer, O. (2011). Imagination und Animation: Die Herstellung mentaler Räume durch animierte Rede. (linguae & litterae 7). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, J. (2015). General extenders use in spoken Peninsular Spanish: Metapragmatics awareness and pedagogical implications. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gudmundsen, J., & Svennevig, J. (2020). Multimodal displays of understanding in vocabulary-oriented sequences. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, S. (1999). Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues. An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 311, 685–708. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinnell, J., & Rice, S. (2023). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Gestured Listing Constructions in English. Conference paper at the 16th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC), HHU Düsseldorf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodges, A. (2015). Intertextuality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 11 (pp. 42–60). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inbar, A. (2020). List Constructions. In R. Berman (Ed.), Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax (pp. 623–658). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1990). List-Construction as a Task and Resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction Competence (pp. 63–92). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knerich, H. (2013). Listenkonstruktionen als vorgeformte Strukturen -vorgeformte Ausdrücke innerhalb von Listenkonstruktionen. Linguistik Online, 62(5), 97–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1994). Responsive List Construction. A Conversational Resource for Accomplishing Multifaceted Social Action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(1), 20–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2013). Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 461, 39–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-Ayala, I. (2003). Constructions as resources for interaction: lists in English and Spanish conversation. Discourse Studies, 5(3), 323–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Making a List. Discourse Processes, 171, 377–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schladebeck, A. (2015). Rhythm as a resource to generate prosodic coherence in lists. In R. Vogel & R. v. d. Vijver (Eds.), Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar. A Germanic Perspective (pp. 277–310). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, U. (2015). The interplay of verbal, vocal, and visual cues in the co-construction of the experience of alterity in exchange students’ talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 811, 21–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwitalla, J. (2012). Gesprochenes Deutsch. Eine Einführung (Vol. 331). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M. (2007). Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 483–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2010). Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (pp. 29–70). Berlin, De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue