Article published In: Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (2024) ► pp.97–129
Escalating prosody
The vocal depiction of mobile action sequences
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the author.
Published online: 23 April 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.23009.szc
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.23009.szc
Abstract
This paper shows how horse-riding instructors vocally depict, and thereby co-design and mobilize the unfolding
progression of horses’ and riders’ actions through gradually escalating prosody. Escalating prosody involves the stepwise raising
of a speaker’s overall pitch across a series of turn components, often accompanied by increases in overall loudness and
occasionally by changes in voice quality. Escalating prosody can accompany instructed activities from beginning to end or only
during certain phases of the activity. The prosodic delivery mirrors the building and subsequent sustaining of physical effort
expected of the horse-rider pair. It can occur with lexical instructions to perform series of actions or with repeated directives
to sustain the current activity. It can also occur with repeated praise as a successful performance unfolds, and with repeated
corrections, which temporally frame moments of trouble. Prosody is shown to be a resource for co-designing the actions of others,
specifically, their mobility, physical effort, and sequential progression. The data are horse-riding lessons recorded in the UK
and in Germany.
Keywords: pitch, intonation, instruction, horse-riding
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Sound patterns in instruction sequences
- 3.Intensified prosodic delivery
- 4.Data
- 5.An interactionalist approach to horse-riding lessons
- 6.Escalating prosody: depicting the mobile activities of others
- 6.1Instructing to-be-sustained activities
- 6.2Unfolding praise
- 6.3Escalating corrections
- 7.Discussion
- Notes
References
References (56)
Ashmore, M., & Reed, D. (2000). Innocence
and nostalgia in conversation analysis: The dynamic relations of tape and transcript. Forum:
Qualitative Research, 1(3). [URL] (last
accessed 06/03/2024).
Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic
profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 70(3), 614–636.
Berg, M., Fuchs, M., Wirkner, K., Loeffler, M. W., Engel, C., & Berger, T. (2017). The
speaking voice in the general population: normative data and associations to sociodemographic and lifestyle
factors. Journal of
Voice, 31(2), 257.e13-e24.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat:
doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.07, retrieved
from [URL] (last
accessed 06/03/2024).
Brandenberger, C., & Hottiger, C. (2018). Sharing
perception when using hands-on exhibits in science centres: the case of vocal
depiction. Travaux neuchâtelois De
Linguistique, 681, 59–68.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional
Linguistics: studying language in social
interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D. (2014). Instructional
sequences in driving lessons: mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of
actions. Journal of
Pragmatics, 651, 63–79.
Deppermann, A. (2018a). Instruction
practices in German driving lessons: differential uses of declaratives and
imperatives. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 28(2), 265–282.
(2018b). Changes
in turn-design over interactional histories: the case of instructions in driving school
lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time
in embodied interaction: synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal
resources (pp. 293–324). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2012). Deontische
Infinitivkonstruktionen: Syntax, Semantik, Pragmatik und interaktionale
Verwendung. In S. Günthner & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionen
in der
Interaktion (pp. 239–262). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ehmer, O. (2021). Synchronization
in demonstrations. Multimodal practices for instructing body knowledge. Linguistics
Vanguard, 7(s4).
(2023). Recycling
turns in multimodal dance instructions. Paper presented at
the 18th International Pragmatics
Conference, Brussels, 9–14.
Ehmer, O., & Brône, G. (2021). Instructing
embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Special
Issue. Linguistics
Vanguard 7(s4).
Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L. (2023). Prosody
is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language and
Communication 881, 52–72.
Keevallik, L. (2014). Turn
organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of
Pragmatics, 651, 103–120.
(2020). Linguistic
structures emerging in the synchronization of a Pilates
class. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing
others. Grammar and lexis within larger
activities (pp. 147–173). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., Weatherall, A., & Wiggins, S. (2023). Sounding
others’ sensations in interaction. Discourse
Processes, 60(1), 73–91.
Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R. (2020). Sounds
on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language & Social
Interaction, 53(1), 1–18.
Kern, F. (2010). Speaking
dramatically. The prosody of live radio commentary of football
matches. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody
in
Conversation (pp. 217–237). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lundesjö Kvart, S. (2020). Instructions
in horseback riding – the collaborative achievement of an instructional space. Learning,
Culture and Social
Interaction, 251, 100253.
Lundesjö Kvart, S., & Melander Bowden, H. (2022). Instructing
equestrian feel: on the art of teaching embodied knowledge. Scandinavian
Journal of Educational
Research, 66(2), 290–305.
Lundgren, C. (2017). Ridtränares
kommunikation under privatlektioner i dressyr: en samtalsanalytisk studie [The communication of trainers in equestrian
dressage: a multimodal interaction analysis]. Scandinavian Sport Studies
Forum, 81, 67–86.
McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., & Haddington, P. (2014). Moving
together: mobile formations in interaction. Editorial to the Special Issue. Space and
Culture, 17(2), 104–106.
Mondada, L. (2019). Conventions
for multimodal transcriptions. Version 5.0.1. [URL] Last
accessed 06/03/2024.
(2018a). Driving
instruction at high speed on a race circuit: issues in action formation and sequence
organization. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 281, 304–325.
(2018b). Multiple
temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing
multimodality. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.
(2017). Precision
timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of
action. In L. Raevaara, M.-L. Sorjonen, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative
turns at talk: the design of directives in
action (pp. 65–101). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Murray, I. R., & Arnott, J. L. (1993). Toward
the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal
emotion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 93(2), 1097–1108.
Norris, S. (2012). Teaching
touch/response-feel. A first step to an analysis of touch from an (inter)active
perspective. In S. Norris (Ed.), Multimodality
in practice: investigating
theory-in-practice-through-methodology (pp. 7–19). London: Routledge.
Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly
not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 53(1), 66–89.
Okada, M. (2023). Lexical
repetitions during time critical moments in boxing. Language &
Communication, 901, 95–113.
(2018). Imperative
actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 51(1), 67–84.
Reed, D. J. (forthcoming). Ethnomethodology
of dance: the achievement of rhythm in the Waltz and Vals. In P. Tolmie, A. Crabtree, D. Randall, & M. Rouncefield (Eds.), Ethnomethodological
studies of
music. London: Routledge.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence
organization in interaction: a primer in Conversation
Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, T. (2014). The
Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoke German – FOLK. In Proceedings
of the Ninth Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 383–387.
Selting, M. (2007). Lists
as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional
resource. Journal of
Pragmatics 391, 483–526.
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., Stukenbrock, A., & Uhmann, S. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches
Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT
2), Gesprächsforschung, 101, 353–402. Translated
and adapted for English by Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). Gesprächsforschung, 121, 1–51.
Simone, M., & Galatolo, R. (2020). Climbing
as a pair: instructions and instructed body movements in indoor climbing with visually impaired
athletes. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1551, 286–302.
(2021). Timing
and prosody of lexical repetition: how repeated instructions assist visually impaired athletes’ navigation in sport
climbing. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 54(4), 397–419.
Stivers, T. (2004). “No
no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication
Research, 30(2), 260–293.
Szczepek Reed, B. (in
press). “You don’t need me shouting here”: When instructors observe learners in
silence. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
(2023a). Designing
talk for humans and horses: prosody as a resource for parallel recipient design. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction, 56(2), 89–115.
(2023b). ‘Go
on keep going’: the instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse
Studies, 25(5), 692–717.
(2021). Singing
and the body: body-focused and concept-focused vocal instruction. Linguistics
Vanguard, 7(s4), 20200071.
Szczepek Reed, B., Reed, D. J., & Haddon, E. (2013). NOW
or NOT NOW: coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in musical
masterclasses. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 46(1), 22–46.
Ten Have, P. (1997). In
the presence of data: Conversation Analysis as ‘empirical philosophy’. Paper presented
at Ethnomethodology, an Improbable Sociology?,
Cerisy-la-Salles, France, June 1997. [URL] (last
accessed 06/03/2024).
Trouvain, J. (2015). Notes
on the development of speaking styles over decades: the case of live football
commentaries. First International Workshop on the History of Speech Communication Research
(HSCR 2015) Dresden, Germany September 4–5,
2015. ISCA Archive [URL] (last
accessed 06/03/2024).
Trouvain, J., & Barry, W. J. (2000). The
prosody of excitement in horse race commentaries. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on
Speech Emotion, September 5–7, 2000. Newcastle, Northern Ireland,
UK. 86–91. ISCA Archive [URL] (last
accessed 06/03/2024).
van Beezooyen, R. (1984). Characteristics
and recognizability of vocal expressions of emotion. (Netherlands Phonetics Archives
5). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Vine, B. (2004). Getting
things done at work: the discourse of power in workplace
interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
