Article published In: Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 2:1 (2022) ► pp.110–136
Doing remembering as a multimodal accomplishment
On the use of mi ricordo (‘I remember’) in Oral History Interviews
Published online: 16 August 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21011.pfa
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21011.pfa
Abstract
The present study investigates how remembering is publicly displayed during storytelling in Oral History Interviews with Italian-speaking witnesses of labor camps during WWII. We focus on the use of the first-person indicative mi ricordo (‘I remember’). In this particular narrative genre, mi ricordo is recurrently used by narrators, as it makes the act of remembering publicly accessible. Drawing upon the methods of Interactional Linguistics, we identify two practices involving the use of mi ricordo: projecting the transition to the narration of a specific episode and displaying epistemic credibility towards facts. We argue that these practices correspond respectively to prospective and retrospective scopes of mi ricordo. Furthermore, a fine-grained multimodal analysis shows that narrators make the scopes of mi ricordo recognizable through recurrent multimodal gestalts, which encompass verbal, prosodic and bodily resources. In the discussion, we argue that the recognizable gestalts are routinized ways of dealing with the emergent character of remembering in oral history interviews and with the interactional tasks that are relevant in this particular communicative genre. The findings highlight that doing remembering is a multimodal accomplishment.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conversational storytelling and the use of I remember
- 3.A multimodal analysis of storytelling in OHI
- 4.Data & method
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Mi ricordo as a resource to project the narration of a specific individual episode
- 5.2The use of mi ricordo for retrospectively upgrading an epistemic stance
- 5.3Mi ricordo as a flexible resource: Combining prospective and retrospective uses
- 6.Results & discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (54)
Auer, P. (2007). Syntax als Prozess. Hausendorf, H. (Ed.): Gespräch als Prozess. Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion (95–124). Tübingen: Narr.
Bazzanella, C. (1990). Phatic connectives as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 141, 629–647.
Bergmann, J. R., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Reconstructive Genres of Everyday Communication. Quasthoff, U. M. (Ed.), Aspects of Oral Communication. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Bothe, A., & Brüning, I. (Eds.). (2015). Geschlecht und Erinnerung im digitalen Zeitalter. Neue Perspektiven auf ZeitzeugInnenarchive. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
Bolden, G. B., & Mandelbaum, J. (2017). The use of conversational co-remembering to corroborate contentious claims. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 3–29.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018a). Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2018b). Stance and Footing. In Interactional linguistics: Study language in social interaction (Online-Chapter C). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2018c). A “Big Package”: Storytelling. In Interactional linguistics: Study language in social interaction (Online-Chapter D). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dankel, P., & Satti, I. (2019). Multimodale Listen. Form und Funktion körperlicher Ressourcen in Aufzählungen in französischen, spanischen und italienischen Interaktionen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 70(1), 58–104.
Deppermann, A. (2005). Glaubwürdigkeit im Konflikt. Rhetorische Techniken in Streitgesprächen. Prozessanalysen von Schlichtungsgesprächen. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
(2015). Retrospection and Understanding in Interaction. In A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (Eds.), Temporality in Interaction. (pp. 57–94). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dressel, D. (2020). Multimodal word searches in collaborative storytelling: On the local mobilization and negotiation of coparticipation. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 37–54.
Duranti, A. (1986). The audience as co-author: An introduction. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 6(3).
Edwards, D., & Middleton, D. (1986). Joint remembering: Constructing an account of shared experience through conversational discourse. Discourse Processes, 9(4), 423–459.
Ehmer, O., & Mandel, D. (2021). Projecting action spaces. On the interactional relevance of cesural areas in co-enactments. Open Linguistics, 7(1), 638–665.
Enfield, N., & Sidnell, J. (2017). On the concept of action in the study of interaction. Discourse Studies, 19(5), 515–535.
Felman, S., & Laub, D. (1991). Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York: Routledge.
Friedman, J. (2014). Oral History, Hermeneutics and Embodiment. The Oral History Review, 41(2), 290–300.
Fuschi, L. (2015). Discourse markers in spoken Italian. The functions of senti and guarda. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld.
Golato, P., & Golato, A. (2018). The real-time processing of pragmatics: An experimental psychological-conversation analytic study of obwohl clauses in spoken German. Journal of Pragmatics, 1321, 21–32.
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Atkinson, J. M. (Ed.), Structures of Social Action (1st ed., pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 115.
Günthner, S. (2006). Von Konstruktionen zu kommunikativen Gattungen: Die Relevanz sedimentierter Muster für die Ausführung kommunikativer Aufgaben. Deutsche Sprache 34(1–2), 173–190.
Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Turn-opening smiles: Facial expression constructing emotional transition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 551, 21–42.
Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., and Ruusuvuori, J. (2014). Foreshadowing a problem. Turn-opening frowns in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 711, 132–147.
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 261, 22–63.
Khachaturyan, E. (2002). “Analisi contestuale dei segnali discorsivi (indagine su diciamo)”. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata, 21, 245–258.
König, K., & Oloff, F. (2018). Ansätze zu einer multimodalen Erzählanalyse. Einführung in das Themenheft. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 191, 207–241.
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271.
Mlynář, J. (2020). “I’ll tell you later on”: Proleptic and analeptic tying devices in oral history interviews. Narrative Inquiry, 30(1), 161–184.
Mondada, L. (2001). Conventions for multimodal transcription. [URL]
(2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156.
Norén, N., & Linell, P. (2013). Pivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomena within a cross-linguistic perspective: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 541, 1–15.
Norrick, N. R. (2004). Humor, tellability, and conarration in conversational storytelling. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 24(1).
(2005). Interactional remembering in conversational narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1819–1844.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1997). Narrative authenticity. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7 (1–4), 83–89.
Pagenstecher, C., & Pfänder, S. (2017). Hidden Dialogues: Towards an Interactional Understanding of Oral History Interviews. In E. Kasten, K. Roller, & J. Wilbur (Eds.), Oral History Meets Linguistics (185–207). Kulturstiftung Sibirien.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2019). At the Interface of Grammar and the Body: Chais pas (“dunno”) as a Resource for Dealing with Lack of Recipient Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(4), 365–387.
Pinchevski, A. (2012). The Audiovisual Unconscious: Media and Trauma in the Video Archive for Holocaust Testimonies. Critical Inquiry 39(1): 142–166.
Pfeiffer, M., & Weiss, C. (2022). Reenactments during tellings: Using gaze for initiating reenactments, switching roles and representing events. Journal of Pragmatics, 1891, 92–113.
Plato, A. von, Leh, A. & Thonfeld, C. (Eds.). (2010). Hitler’s Slaves: Life Stories of Forced Labourers in Nazi-Occupied Europe. New York: Berghahn.
Quasthoff, U. (2001). Erzählen als interaktive Gesprächsstruktur. In K. Brinker, G. Antos, W. Heinemann, & S. F. Sager (Eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (Bd. 21, S. 1293–1309). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Rühlemann, C., Gee, M., & Ptak, A. (2019). Alternating gaze in multi-party storytelling. Journal of Pragmatics, 1491, 91–113.
Selting, M. (2007). Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 483–526.
Selting, M. et al. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift Zur verbalen Interaktion, 101, 353–402.
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409.
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57.
Stukenbrock, A. (2021). Multimodal Gestalts and Their Change Over Time: Is Routinization Also Grammaticalization? Frontiers in Communication, 61, 662240.
Tanner, A., & Stirling, L. (2017). The past is a foreign country: Disputed memories and telling rights in co-narrated refugee stories. Text & Talk, 37(6), 759–787.
Waltereit, R. (2002). Imperatives, interruption in conversation and the rise of discourse particles: A study of Italian guarda. Linguistics 401, 987–1010.
