Article published In: Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2021) ► pp.90–122
The emancipation of gestures
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 6 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20013.str
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20013.str
Abstract
Interactional linguists are interested in ways in which communicative resources emerge from interactional
practice. This paper defines a place for the study of gesture within interactional linguistics, conceived as ‘linguistics of time’
( (2015). Hermann
Paul’s emergent grammar. In P. Auer & R. W. Murray (Eds.), Hermann
Paul’s Principles of language history
revisited (pp. 237–256). Berlin: de Gruyter. ). It shows how hand gestures of a certain kind – conceptual
gestures – emerge from ‘hands-on’ instrumental actions, are repeated and habitualized, and are taken to other communicative
contexts where they enable displaced reference and conceptual representation of experiences.
The data for this study is a video-recording of one work-day of an auto-shop owner ( (2017). Self-making
man. A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. ). The corpus includes auto-repair sequences in which he spontaneously improvises new
gestures in response to situated communication needs, and subsequent narrative sequences during which he re-enacts them as he
explains his prior actions. He also makes numerous ‘pre-fabricated’ gestures, gestures that circulate in the society at large and
that are acquired by copying other conversationalists. They are ready-made manual concepts. The paper explains the life-cycle of
conceptual gestures from spontaneous invention to social sedimentation and thereby sheds light on the ongoing emergence of
symbolic forms in corporeal practice and intercorporeal communication.
Keywords: gesture, conceptualization, grammaticalization, interaction, evolution
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conceptual gestures
- 3.The emancipation of conceptual gestures in an auto-shop
- 3.1First abstraction: From action to gesture
- 3.2Second abstraction: Iconicity and displacement
- 3.3Third abstraction: Generalization across contexts
- 4.Parallels between grammaticalization and the emancipation of gestures
- 4.1Repetition and habitualization
- 4.2Bleaching
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (75)
Andrén, M. (2017). Children’s
expressive handling of objects in a shared world. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality:
Emerging socialities in
interaction (pp. 105–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986
[1952–3]). The problem of speech
genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech
genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding
conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive
Science, 7(2), 84–91.
Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive
gestures. Discourse
Processes, 151, 469–489.
Bressem, J., & Mueller, C. (2014). A
repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic
functions. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body
language communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol.
Volume 21, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brookes, H. J. (2004). A
repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic
Anthropology, 14(2), 186–224.
Bybee, J. L. (1998). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language (Vol. 21, pp. 145–168). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46.
(2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins B.V..
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor
and
gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cuffari, E., & Streeck, J. (2017). Taking the world by hand: How (some) hand gestures mean. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 173–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Jorio, A. (2000
[1832]). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity (A. Kendon, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world.
A commentary on Heidegger’s “Being and time”. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The
repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and
coding. Semiotica, 11, 49–98.
Galantucci, B. (2005). An
experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive
Science, 291, 737–767.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The
brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479.
Givon, T., & Malle, B. F. (2002). The
evolution of language out of
pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally
coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture
and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David
McNeill (pp. 195–212). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haiman, J. (1994). Ritualization
and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives
on
grammaticalization (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Haviland, J. B. (2013). The
emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and
syntax. Gesture, 13(3), 309–353.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2011). Grammaticalization
theory as a tool for reconstructing language evolution. In K. R. Gibson & M. Tallermann (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, P. J. (1994). Phonogenesis. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives
on
grammaticalization (pp. 29–45). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2011). Emergent
grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions.
Emerging and
emergent (pp. 22–44). Berlin: de Gruyter.
(2015). Hermann
Paul’s emergent grammar. In P. Auer & R. W. Murray (Eds.), Hermann
Paul’s Principles of language history
revisited (pp. 237–256). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hutchins, E., & Johnson, C. M. (2009). Modeling
the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity. Topics in Cognitive
Science, 11, 523–546.
Kendon, A. (1988). How
gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Crosscultural
perspectives on nonverbal
communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.
(1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247–279.
(2009). Manual actions, speech and the nature of language In D. Gambarara & A. Givigliano (Eds.), Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia. Società di Filosofia del Linguaggio, atti del XV congresso nazionale. Arcavata di Rende (CS), 15-17 settembre 2008 (pp. 19–33). Rome: Aracne editrice s.r.l.
Lakoff, G. (1982). Categories:
An essay in cognitive linguistics. In T. L. S. O. Korea (Ed.), Linguistics
in the morning
calm (pp. 139–193). Seoul: Hanshin.
Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s
unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1998). Conceptualization,
symbolization, and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The
New psychology of
language (Vol. 11, pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
LeBaron, C. D. (1998). Building
communication: Architectural gestures and the embodiment of new ideas. Ph.D.
Dissertation: The University of Texas at Austin.
LeBaron, C. D., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand
and mind. What gestures reveal about
thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C. (2003). Forms
and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. In C. Müller & R. Posner (Eds.), The
semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. The Berlin
Conference (pp. 234–256). Berlin: Weidler.
(2017). How
recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied
motivation. Gesture, 16(2), 276–303.
Nuñez, R. (2008). A
fresh look at the foundations of mathematics: Gesture and the psychological reality of conceptual
metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor
and
gesture (pp. 55–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Padden, C., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S. (2014). Tools
for language: Patterned iconicity in sign languages nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive
Science, 71, 81–94.
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The
bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical
Transactions: Biological
Sciences, 369(1651), 1–13.
Reddy, M. (1979). The
conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about
language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and
thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheets-Johnstone, M.. (2010). Thinking
in movement: Further analyses and validations. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction.
Toward a new paradigm for Cognitive
Science (pp. 165–181). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
(2012). Kinesthetic
memory. Further critical reflections and constructive
analyses In T. F. Sabine, C. Koch, M. Summa and C. Müller (Eds.), Body
memory, metaphor and
movement (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From
“thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking
linguistic
relativity (pp. 97–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sowa, T. (2006). Understanding
coverbal iconic gestures in shape
descriptions. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture
as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication
Monographs, 601(December 1993), 275–299.
(2002). Grammars,
words, and embodied meanings. On the evolution and uses of so and
like. Journal of
Communication, 52(3), 581–596.
(2007). Geste
und verstreichende Zeit. Innehalten und Bedeutungswandel der “bietenden
Hand”. In H. Hausendorf (Ed.), Gespraech
als
Prozess (pp. 157–180). Tuebingen: Gunter Narr.
(2008). Depicting
by
gestures. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301.
(2009). Gesturecraft.
The manu-facture of
meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2017). Self-making
man. A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, G. (2015). A
million years of music. The emergence of human modernity. New York: Zone Books.
Wehling, E. (2017). Discourse
management
gestures. Gesture, 16(2), 245–275.
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
Ceylan, Süleyman Can, Demet Özer & Tilbe Göksun
Geva, Yuval
2025. Syntax and music for interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 35:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Glasson, Nicholas & Katherine Halley
Kelly, Spencer D. & Quang‐Anh Ngo Tran
Kopcha, Theodore, Jaime Diamond & Kelly Kulp
Macedonia, Manuela
Schröder, Ulrike & Flavia Fidelis de Paula
Stamp, Rose, Adi Ben Israel, Klil Eden, Lilyana Khatib, Vera Karpova & Hagit Hel Or
Choi, Yoon-Sung
Janin, Loanne
Löfgren, Agnes
Tancredi, Sofia & Dor Abrahamson
Tolvanen, Eveliina
2024. ‘I think’ in Swedish L1 and L2 group interactions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 34:4 ► pp. 615 ff.
Youn, Soo Jung
2023. Grammar as validity evidence for assessing L2 interactional competence. Applied Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 174 ff.
Eskildsen, S. W.
Harrison, Simon & Silva H. Ladewig
2021. Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Harrison, Simon, Silva H. Ladewig & Jana Bressem
Stukenbrock, Anja
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
