Article published In: International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 3:1 (2016) ► pp.90–114
Gender in Hinuq and other Nakh-Daghestanian languages
Published online: 5 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.3.1.05for
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.3.1.05for
Nakh-Daghestanian languages are known for their relatively elaborate gender systems and the impact the systems have on the grammar of the languages, most notably on verbal agreement. This paper explores the gender system of Hinuq with its five genders, taking into account semantic and formal principles for gender assignment and the rules of verbal and nonverbal gender agreement. Moreover, the paper discusses the Hinuq gender system within the wider context of Nakh-Daghestanian gender systems and possible social and cultural influences on these systems.
References (42)
Akhlakov, A.A. (1976). Avarskie teksty. In A.A. Axlakov & K.M. Xalilov (Eds.), Satira i jumor narodov Dagestana (pp. 7–42). Makhachkala: Daginogoizdat.
Alekseev, M.E. (2003). Sravnitelʼno-istoričeskaja morfologija naxsko-dagestanskix jazykov: Kategorii imeni. Moscow: Academia.
Authier, G. (2009). Grammaire Kryz: Langue Caucasique d’Azerbaidjan dialecte d’Alik. Leuven/Paris: Peeters.
Baerman, M., & Corbett, G.G. (2013). Person by other means. In D. Bakker & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska (pp. 1–14). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bokarev, E.A. (1959). Cezskie (didojskie) jazyki Dagestana. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Comrie, B., & Polinsky, M. (1999). Some observations on class categorization in Tsez. In H. van den Berg (Ed.), Studies in Caucasian linguistics: Selected papers of the eighth Caucasian colloquium (pp. 125–139). Leiden: CNWS.
Chumakina, M., Kibort, A., & Corbett, G.G. (2007). Determining a language’s feature inventory: Person in Archi. Linguistische Berichte, 141, 143–172.
Daniel, M. (2015, May 15). Person in Archi revisited, with parallels from Dargwa and Nakh. Paper presented at
Language in Daghestan Conference
, Chicago.
. (in preparation). Grammatical relations in Sanzhi Dargwa. In B. Bickel & A. Witzlack-Makarevich (Eds.), Handbook of grammatical relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Friedman, V. (1996). Gender, class, and age in the Daghestanian highlands: Towards a unified account of the morphology of agreement in Lak. In H. Aronson (Ed.), Linguistic studies in the non-Slavic languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic Republics, Vol. 81 (pp. 187–199). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Gagliardi, A., & Lidz, J. (2014). Statistical insensitivity in the acquisition of Tsez noun classes. Language, 901, 58–89.
Imnajšvili, D.S. (1963). Didojskij jazyk v sravnenii s ginuxskim i xwaršijskim jazykami. Tbilisi: Izd. AN Gruzinskoj SSR.
Hellinger, M., & Bussmann, H. (Eds.). (2001-2003). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 1-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaliszewska, I., & Falkowski, M. (2015). Veiled and unveiled in Chechnya and Daghestan. London: Hurst.
Khalilov, M. Š., & Isakov, I.A. (2005). Ginuxsko-russkij slovar’. Makhachkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.
Kibrik, A.E., Kodzasov, S.V., Olovjannikova, I.P., & Samedov, D.F.S. (1977). Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka, Vol. 11. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Kibrik, A.E. (1994). Archi. In Rieks Smeets (Ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 4. The North East Caucasian languages II (pp. 297–365). Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.
. (1999). Suščestvitel’noe. In A.E. Kibrik (Ed.), Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii (pp. 48–57). Moscow: Nasledie.
Kibrik, A.E., & Testelec, J.G. (2004). Bezhta. In M. Job (Ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, vol. 3: The North East Caucasian languages, part 1 (pp. 217–295). Ann Arbor: Caravan Books.
Nichols, J. (1989). The Nakh evidence for the history of gender in Nakh-Daghestanian. In H.I. Aronson (Ed.), The non-Slavic languages of the USSR: Linguistic studies (pp. 158–175). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
. (2007, December 8). Head gender/source gender in Nakh-Daghestanian: Synchrony and typology. Paper presented at
Conference on the languages of the Caucasus
, MPI EVA Leipzig.
Plaster, K., Polinsky, M., & Harizanov, B. (2013). Noun classes grow on trees. In B. Bickel, L.A. Grenoble, D. A. Peterson, & A. Timberlake (Eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols (pp. 153–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poplack, S., Pousada, A., & Sankoff, D. (1982). Competing influences on gender assignment: Variable process, stable outcome. Lingua, 571, 1–28.
Saidova, P.A., & Abusov, M.G. (2012). Botlixsko-russkij slovar’. Makhachkala: Institut JaLI DNC RAN.
Schulze, W. (1992). How can class markers petrify? Towards a functional diachrony of morphological subsystems. In H.I. Aronson (Ed.), The non-Slavic languages of the USSR (pp. 189–233). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Šejxov, È. M. (2000). Buduxskij jazyk. In G.G. Gamzatov (Ed.), Jazyki Dagestana (pp. 483–496). Makhachkala/Moscow: RAN, Otdelenie Literatura i Jazyka.
Sosenskaja, T. (1999). Mestoimenie. In A.E. Kibrik (Ed.), Èlementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii (pp. 129–151). Moscow: Nasledie.
Testelec, J.G. (1998). Word order in Daghestanian languages. In A. Siewierska (Ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe (pp. 257–280). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Levkovych, Nataliya
Bellamy, Kate & Jesse Wichers Schreur
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
Wichers Schreur, Jesse
2021. Nominal borrowings in Tsova-Tush (Nakh-Daghestanian, Georgia) and their
gender assignment. In Language contact in the territory of the former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50], ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
