Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.119–150

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Cultural semantics of the ‘salt’ word in Persian

 | Griffith University
Published online: 14 June 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.21038.ara
Abstract
This article explicates the cultural conceptualizations of the word for salt (namak) in Persian. The concept of namak reveals an important aspect of Persian sociality, hospitality, mutual respect, and playfulness. For instance, a person’s face or words can be perceived to ‘have salt’, or one’s hand is declared to ‘not have salt’ in the Persian language. To examine the conceptualization of namak, this article makes use of corpus data as well as the metalanguage proposed by Natural Semantic Metalanguage to spell out the nuances of salt-related cultural concepts in Persian. Three senses are identified for namak from a historical perspective: namak0 for the substance of salt; namak1 the cornerstone of Iranian sociality and hospitality; and namak2 the pleasantness, which has changed its semantic content from referring to being pleasant and eloquent to being amusing and playful.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cultural semantics
  • 3.Corpus data
  • 4.Hospitality: Namak0 and Namak1
    • 4.1Namak0
    • 4.2Namak1
  • 5.Pleasantness: Namak2
  • 6.With salt
  • 7.Without salt
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (85)
References
Ameka, F. (1994). Ewe. In C. Goddard & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings (pp. 57–86). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amouzadeh, M., & Tavangar, M. (2005). Sociolinguistic transfer: The case of Persian speakers in Australia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1471, 63–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apresjan, J. D. (1974). Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 14(2), 5–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arab, R. (2020). Ethnopragmatics of hāzer javābi, a valued speech practice in Persian. In K. Mullan, B. Peeters, & L. Sadow (Eds.), Studies in ethnopragmatics, cultural semantics, and intercultural communication (pp. 75–94). Singapore, SG: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). To be with salt, to speak with taste: Metapragmatics of playful speech practices in Persian (unpublished PhD thesis), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
(forthcoming). Metapragmatics of maze (taste) in Persian. In A. Korangy (Ed.), Persian cultural linguistics and pragmatics. Singapore, SG: Springer.
Asdjodi, M. (2001). A comparison between ta’arof in Persian and limao in Chinese. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 1481, 71–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atoofi, S. (2011). Poetics of repetition in ordinary talk: A case among Persian heritage language teachers and their students. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3362–3373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeman, W. O. (1976). Status, style and strategy in Iranian interaction. Anthropological Linguistics, 181, 305–322.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington, US: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Sincerity and emotion in Persian discourse: Accomplishing the representations of inner states. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 1481, 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, N. (2009). Responses to Failed Humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1825–1836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, F. (1911). Introduction [to the] handbook of American Indian languages. Washington, DC, US: Bureau of American Ethnology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carbaugh, D. (2007). Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 167–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2016). The handbook of communication in cross-cultural perspective. London, UK & New York, US: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, T. (2009). From tolerance to hospitality: problematic limits of a negative virtue. Philosophy in the contemporary world, 161, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, R. T. (2009). Extension. In A dictionary of philosophical logic. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, M. (2017). Academics vs. American scriptwriters vs. academics: A battle over the etic and emic “sarcasm” and “irony” Labels. Language and Communication, 551, 69–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester, UK: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2011). Taste in two tongues: A southeast Asian study of semantic convergence. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 30–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eslami, Z. R. (2005). Invitations in Persian and English: Ostensible or genuine? Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 453–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (1994). Polysemy. In R. E. Asher & J. M. L. Simpson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 3227–3228). New York, US: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladkova, A. (2007). Universal and language-specific aspects of “propositional attitudes”: Russian vs. English. In A. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states: Vol. 2: Language and cognitive structure (pp. 61–83). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). “Sympathy,” “compassion,” and “empathy” in English and Russian: A linguistic and cultural analysis. Culture and Psychology, 16(2), 267–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2002). On and on: Verbal explications for a polysemic network. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 277–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). The ethnopragmatics and semantics of “active metaphors”. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1211–1230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2006). Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context. Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007a). Semantic primes and conceptual ontology. In A. C. Schalley & D. Zaefferer (Eds.), Ontolinguistics: How ontological status shapes the linguistic coding of concepts (pp. 145–174). Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). Semantic molecules. In I. Mushin & M. Laughern (Eds.), Selected papers of the 2006 annual meeting of the Australian linguistic society. [URL]
(Ed.) (2008). Cross-linguistic semantics. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Semantic analysis: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Words as carriers of cultural meaning. In J. R. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word (pp. 380–398). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Ten lectures on natural semantic metalanguage: Exploring language, thought and culture using simple, translatable words. Leiden, NL: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: “Cutting” and ‘chopping’ in English, Polish, and Japanese. Language Sciences, 31(1), 60–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages and cultures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C., & Ye, Z. (2014). Ethnopragmatics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 66–84). London, UK & New York, US: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2012). Epilogue: The first-order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 8(1), 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, D., & Goddard, C. (1997). Spatial terms, polysemy and possession in Longgu (Solomon Islands). Language Sciences, 19(3), 263–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hillmann, M. C. (1978). Language and social distinctions in Iran. In M. E. Bonine & N. R. Keddie (Eds.), Modem Iran: The dialectics of continuity and change (pp. 327–340). Albany, US: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, C. T. (1957). Some aspects of Persian style. Language, 331, 355–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houston, C. (2009). “Thou glorious kingdome, thou chiefe of empires”: Persia in early seventeenth-century travel literature. Studies in Travel Writing, 131, 141–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howes, D., & Classen, C. (1991). Sounding sensory profiles. In D. Howes (Ed.), The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses (pp. 257–288). Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izadi, A. (2015). Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 851, 81–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Killgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 11, 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutlaki, S. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Ta’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1733–1756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, D. Y. (2017). Ethnic foods and their taste: Salt and sugar. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 3(4), 133–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leavitt, J. (2015). Ethnosemantics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 51–65). London, UK & New York, US: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levisen, C. (2012). Cultural semantics and social cognition: A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin, DE: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2011). The senses in language and culture. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 5–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthee, R. (2009). The Safavids under western eyes: Seventeenth-century European travellers to Iran. Journal of Early Modern History, 131, 137–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehran, J. (2019). The meaning of hospitality in Iran. In A. Correia, M. Kozak, & A. I. Rodrigues (Eds.), Experiencing Persian heritage, Vol. 10 (pp. 155–167). Bingley, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mizumoto, M., Ganeri, J., & Goddard, C. (Eds.). (2020). Ethno-epistemology: New directions for global epistemology. London, UK & New York, US: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moosavie, S. M. (1986). A sociolinguistic analysis of the Persian system of taarof and its implication for the teaching of Farsi (Doctoral dissertation), University of Texas at Austin, the USA.
Roberts, J. R., Barjasteh Delforooz, B., & Jahani, C. (2009). A study of Persian discourse structure. Uppsala, SE: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senft, G., Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2007). The language of taste. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field manual, Vol. 10 (pp. 42–45). Nijmegen, NL: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2004). Cultural schemas and intercultural communication: A study of Persian. In J. Leigh & E. Loo (Eds.), Outer limits: A reader in communication across cultures (pp. 119–130). Melbourne, AU: Language Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Cultural schemas in L1 and L2 compliment responses: A study of Persian-speaking learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(1), 55–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). London, UK & New York, US: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taleghani-Nikazm, C. M. (1999). Politeness in native–nonnative speakers’ interaction: Some manifestations of Persian taarof in the interaction among Iranian speakers of German with German native speakers (Doctoral dissertation), University of Texas at Austin, the USA.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (ed. and intro. J. B. Carroll). Cambridge, US: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1972). Semantic primitives. Frankfurt, DE: Athenäum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Speech act verbs. Sydney, AU: Academic Press Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Berlin, DE: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, Japanese. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006a). Anglo scripts against “putting pressure” on other people and their linguistic manifestations. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context (pp. 65–98). Berlin, DE: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006b). English: Meaning and culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences, 29(1), 14–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Language and metalanguage: Key issues in emotion research. Emotion Review, 1(1), 3–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1), 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, J. (2000). The semantics of Singapore English. Singapore, SG: Centre for Advanced Studies Research, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yarbakhsh, E. (2018). Reading Derrida in Tehran: Between an open door and an empty sofreh. Humanities, 7(1), 21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ye, Z. (Ed.). (2017). The semantics of nouns. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2009). The Chinese HEART in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Berlin, DE: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zarrinkoub, A. (2006). History of Iranian people: From the end of the Sasanian to the end of the Buyid [Tārixe mardome iran: az pāyāne sāsāniyān tā pāyāne āle buye]. Tehran, IR: Amirkabir.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zonis, M. (1971). Political elite of Iran. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Arab, Reza
2024. Metapragmatics of Maze (Taste) in Persian. In The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics [Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics, ], ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue