Article published In: International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.27–47
The reschematization of face in Chinese overseas students’ intercultural experience
Published online: 22 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.20020.hou
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.20020.hou
Abstract
There has been little longitudinal research on the relationship between how sojourners define their personal face
and how this influences their use of the host language in intercultural settings. This study employs the Cultural Linguistic
Perspective developed by Sharifian ( (2011). Cultural conceptulisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. , (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ), using repeated episodic interviews to explore the process of reschematization of face among three Chinese
overseas students in Australia. The students’ schemas of face gradually moved away from the Chinese ideals of sociality and
indirectness towards Australian norms of individual autonomy and directness in both English use and social relationships. This
study points to the need to examine the contribution of personal, situational, and cultural factors to this process.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Cultural Linguistics
- 3.Western and Chinese concepts of face
- 4.This study
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1The cultural schemas of face in relation to English use
- 5.2Face reschematization in social interactions
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (59)
Arundale, R. B. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, face-work, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2078–2105.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, England; Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Chai, C., & Chai, W. (1965). The sacred books of Confucius and other Confucian classics. New York: Bantam Books, Inc.
Chang, H.-C., & Holt, G. R. (1994). A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), Challenge of facework (pp. 95–132). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Department of Education, A. G. (2019). [URL]
Dewaele, J. M., & Botes, E. (2020). Does multilingualism shape personality? An exploratory investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(4), 811–823.
Gao, G. (1998). “Don’t take my word for it”--understanding Chinese speaking practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 221, 163–186.
(2009). Face and self in Chinese communication. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social Interaction (pp. 175–191). London; Oakville: Equinox
Gao, G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goffman, E. (1955). On facework: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 181, 213–231.
He, M., & Zhang, S.-j. (2011). Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a face-sensitive perspective: A case study of a modern Chinese TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 2360–2372.
Holmes, P. (2004). Negotiating differences in learning and intercultural communication: Ethnic Chinese students in a New Zealand University. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(3), 294–307.
(2006). Problematizing intercultural communication competence in the pluricultural classroom: Chinese students in a New Zealand university. Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 18–34.
Jia, W. (1997). Facework as a Chinese conflict-preventive mechanism--A cultural/ discourse analysis. Intercultural Communication Studies, 71, 43–58.
(2001). Remaking the Chinese Character and Identity in the 21st Century: The Chinese Face Practices. Westport, CT: Ablex/ Greenwood.
(2003). The Chinese conceptualizations of face: Personhood, communication and emotions. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (10th edition ed., pp. 48–57). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
(2006). Wei (positioning)-ming (naming)-lianmian (face)-guanxi (relationship)-renqing (humanized feelings). In P. Hershock & R. Ames (Eds.), Cultures of Authority: China (pp. 49–64). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Kinnison, L. (2017). Power, integrity, and mask--An attempt to disentangle the Chinese face concept. Journal of Pragmatics, 1141, 32–48.
Li, W. (2011). Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 431(2011), 1222–1235.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE.
Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41(e1). , e1
Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “face” revisited and reviewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–486.
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 403–426.
Rintell, E. M. (1990). That’s incredible: Stories of emotion told by second language learners and native speakers. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 75–94). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford, UK Blackwell.
Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural congnition, conceptualisation and language. In R. D. R. M. Frank, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernardez (Ed.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 247–265). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2011). Cultural conceptulisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013). Globalization and developing metacultural competence in English as an international language. Multilingual Education, 3(7), 1–11.
(2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(Ed.) (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Shi, X. (2011). The impact of face on Chinese students’ simulated negotiation practices with Americans. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 26–40.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed., pp. 11–47). London: Continuum.
Tantucci, V., & Wang, A. (2018). Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 1381, 60–76.
(2020). Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies, 22(2), 146–173.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: an updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2017). Facework and face negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(3), 361–374.
Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18–38.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 159–170.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
