Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 8:2 (2021) ► pp.323–345

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cultural Conceptualization of Tamil Hindu Marriages

 | University of Malaya
Published online: 29 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.18010.sha
Abstract
This study investigates the cultural conceptualization of marriage among Tamil Hindu communities in Australia and Malaysia. The Hindu cultural schema of marriage relates to the physical, social and spiritual aspects, and language acts as the central aspect of the cultural cognition of the community. Data is based on a variety of sources, particularly focus group discussions, translated verses from Hindu Holy Scriptures (Vedanta), and personal interviews. Findings show various cultural schemas entrenched within the marriage schema, particularly Vedic Astrology, Sacred Invocation and Blessings, which are shared knowledge among community members. The cultural schema of marriage (or vivaha) that is instantiated in the Vedanta considers marriage a religious obligation (Dharma). It is during social interactions that the cultural metaphors associated with marriage are discussed. marriage as a thousand-year crop and marriage as a journey are metaphorical expressions that illustrate the traditional worldview of the Tamil Hindu community.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The framework
  • 3.Data source
  • 4.The conceptualization of marriage
    • 4.1Sacred invocation sub-schema
    • 4.2Vedic astrology sub-schema
  • 5.Metaphors
    • 5.1Marriage as a thousand-year crop
    • 5.2Marriage as a journey
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Reference
References (44)
Reference
Achari, S. R. R. (n.d.). The Hindu Sacrament of Marriage. India: Simha Publications. Retrieved from [URL]
Ayer, V. A. K. (1987). Hindu Sastras and Samskaras (4th ed.). Bombay, India: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction. Power and Ideology in Education. pp. 487–511. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, P. R., & Wilcox, C. (2005). Trends: Same-sex Marriage and Civil Unions. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 69(4), 599–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, D., Freedman, V. A., Cornman, J. C., & Schwarz, N. (2014). Happy Marriage, Happy Life? Marital Quality and Subjective Well-being in Later Life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 930–948. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dempsey, K. (2001). Women’s and Men’s Consciousness of Shortcomings in Marital Relations, and of the Need for Change. Family Matters, 581, 58–63. Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, C. D. (2004). Cultural Models and Metaphors for Marriage: An Analysis of Discourse at Japanese Wedding Receptions. Ethos, 32(3), 348–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work: A Practical Guide from the Country’s Foremost Relationship Expert. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2015). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohm, L. M., & Groen, K. M. (2005). Cohabitation and the Future of Marriage. Regent University Law Review, 17(20), 261–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luibheid, E. (2008). Sexuality, Migration, and the Shifting Line between Legal and Illegal Status. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 14(2–3), 289–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzer, E. W. (2010). Truth about Same Sex Marriage. Chicago: Moody Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malcolm, I. G., & Rochecouste, J. (2000). Event and Story Schemas in Australian Aboriginal English Discourse. English World-Wide, 21(2), 261–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKellin, W. H. (2017). Grounding and Relational Schemas in Managalese, Papua New Guinea. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in Cultural Linguistics. (pp. 335–372). Singapore: Springer Nature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menski, W. (1998). Sati a review article. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. University of London. 61(1), 74–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nebashi, R. (2011). Role Schema and its Modification: Stereotypical Images among Japanese, Chinese and Americans. Journal of Information and Communication Studies, 10(11), 51–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishida, H. (1999). A Cognitive Approach to Intercultural Communication Based on Schema Theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 23(5), 753–777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Cultural Schema Theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. (pp. 401–418). Thousand Oaks: California, Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Frey, S. (2017). Are Marriages Made in Heaven? A Cultural-Linguistic Case Study on Indian-English Matrimonials. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in Cultural Linguistics. (pp. 573–605). Singapore: Springer Nature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, N. (1982). ‘Commitment’ in American Marriage: A Cultural Analysis. American Ethnologist, 9(4), 775–798. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Convergent Evidence for a Cultural Model of American Marriage. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought. (pp. 173–192). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, N., D’Andrade, R., & Mathews, H. F. (2005). Finding Culture in Talk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rig Veda verses. In S. R. R. Achari. The Hindu Sacrament of Marriage. India: Simha Publications. Retrieved from: [URL]
Russell, P. & Shearer, A. (1978). The Upanishads. Great Britain: Wildwood House Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Satapatha Brahmana. In S. R. R. Achari. The Hindu Sacrament of Marriage. India: Simha Publications. Retrieved from: [URL]
(2013a). Cultural Linguistics. In C. A. Chapelle (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. English Books. 31. (pp. 1590–1596). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Globalisation and Developing Metacultural Competence in Learning English as an International Language. Multilingual Education, 3(7), 11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cultural Linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture (pp. 473–492). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2017). Advances in Cultural Linguistics. Singapore: Springer Nature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shearer, A., & Russell, P. (1990). The Upanishads. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1987). Relevance Theory. In L. R. Horn, & G. L. Ward (Eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A., Herrmann, G., Berenike, J., Kaal, A. A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in Usage. Cognitive Linguistics 21(4), 757–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Su, L. I. (2002). What can metaphors tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 589–613.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taittriya Brahmana. In S. R. R. Achari. The Hindu Sacrament of Marriage. India: Simha Publications. Retrieved from: [URL]
Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. A. Hermann, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition. The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology. 11. (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tejomayananda, S. (1994). Hindu Culture: An Introduction. The Hindu Culture Series. Bombay, India: Chinmaya Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosino, J. (1993). American Wedding: Same Sex Marriage and the Miscegenation Analogy. Boston University Law Review, 73(1), 93–120. Retrieved from: [URL]
Xu, Z. (2014). A Cultural Linguistics Approach to Asian Englishes. Asian Englishes 16(2), 173–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alemi, Minoo & Zia Tajeddin
2025. Cultural Conceptualizations and ELT Curriculum. In Cultural Linguistics and ELT Curriculum [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue