Article published In: International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.305–350
Ethnodiachrony, Buddhism, and ethnicity
An anthropological approach to Khmer dialectology
Published online: 24 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.17001.pai
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.17001.pai
Abstract
The paper focuses on how ethnicity is constructed and negotiated as well as on how it surfaces through language
convergence. The paper aims to demonstrate that, in the very specific Khmer case, dialect convergences cannot be explained through
an exclusive internal analysis of the linguistic system that would dismiss the comprehension of the anthropological environment.
It is shown that external anthropological factors bound to ethnicity are to be taken into account in the understanding of dialect
convergences.
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Ethnicity, Panchronic Phonology, and “Ethnodiachrony”
- 1.1Ethnicity is not what it is but rather what is perceived
- 1.2Panchronic phonology: Phonology in its anthropological context
- 1.3An “ethnodiachronic” perspective on Khmer dialectology
- 1.3.1Definitional problem
- 1.3.2A predominantly synchronic approach on language
- 1.3.3An “Ethnodiachronic” approach
- 1.4Purpose of the paper
- 2.A short presentation of the Khmeric family
- 2.1Khmer and its dialects
- 2.2Diachronic stages
- 2.3Middle Khmer vowel system
- 3.Selection of classificatory criteria and Khmer dialectology
- 3.1The problem
- 3.2The selected classificatory criterion
- 3.3Some classificatory sub-criteria
- 4.Dialect fragmentation in the Mekong Delta
- 4.1Trà Vinh Khmer: A Cardamom dialect in the Mekong Delta
- 4.1.1In the R1 open syllables, the mk phonemes /ɨː iː/ did not merge
- 4.1.2No evolution of mk /eː/ towards /ɛː/ and ultimately /ae/ in R1
- 4.1.3 mk /ɛː/ is kept in R1
- 4.1.4No evolution of mk /iː/ towards /eː/ in R1
- 4.1.5The opposition between mk /ɨ i iː/ is kept through an opposition between three register pairs
- 4.1.6Significant self-censorship and generational differences
- 4.2The Sóc Trăng dialect: From a Northern to a Central dialect
- 4.3Change speed and standardisation vectors
- 4.1Trà Vinh Khmer: A Cardamom dialect in the Mekong Delta
- 5.Khmer ethnic identification and dialect convergence
- 5.1Historical breeding ground of Middle Khmer and dialectal consequences
- 5.2Standard Central Khmer, Buddhism, and affirmation of the Khmer identification
- 5.3Consequences
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
Bibliography
References (83)
Barth, Fredrik. (1969). Introduction. In Fredrik Barth (Ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organization of Culture Difference (pp. 9–38). Boston: Little, Brown.
Bauer, Christian. (1989).
Crieeng Bruen Khmer epic recitatives: inherited form or adaptation. Phasā Lae Watthanatham [Journal of Language and Culture], 8(1), 62–89.
. (2011). Le khmer. In Bonvini Emilio, Joëlle Busuttil & Alain Peyraube (Eds.), Dictionnaire des langues (pp. 1102–1108). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bentley, Carter G. (1987). Ethnicity and Practice. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29(1), 24–55.
de Bernon, Olivier. (2002). L’inscription K.1212 du Vatt Samrong Ek dans la province de Tra Vinh au Viêt-nam. Aséanie, 91, 35–46.
Bertrand, Didier. (1998). Les Vietnamiens au Cambodge: analyse des représentations et des conditions d’intégration. Aséanie, 21, 27–46.
Chandler, David P. (1984). Normative Poems (chbap) and Pre-Colonial Cambodian Society. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15(2), 271–9.
Cohen, Abner. (1969). Custom and Politics in Urban Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Connor, Walker. (1993). Beyond Reason. The Nature of Ethnonational Bond. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 161, 373–89.
Cornell, Stephen & Hartmann Douglas (1997). Ethnicity and Race. Making Identities in a Changing World. London: Pine Forge Press.
Cotter, Michael G. (1968). Towards a Social History of the Vietnamese Southward Movement. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 9(1), 14–24.
Dhanan, Chantrupanth & Chartchai Phromjakgarin (1978). Khmer (Surin) – Thai – English Dictionary. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Language Institute.
Edwards, Penny. (2004). Making a Religion of the Nation and Its Language. The French Protectorate (1863–1954) and the Dhammakāy
. In John Marston & Elizabeth Guthrie (Eds.), History, Buddhism, and New Religious Movements in Cambodia (pp. 63–85). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Enfield, Nicholas J. (Ed.) (2002). Ethnosyntax. Exploration in Grammar and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Englebert, Thomas. (1994). The Khmer in Southern Vietnam: Cambodians or Vietnamese? In Ingrid Wessel (Ed.) Nationalism and Ethnicity in Southeast Asia (pp. 176–85). Berlin: Humboldt Universität.
Ferlus, Michel. (1992). Essai de phonétique historique du khmer (Du milieu du premier millénaire de notre ère à l’époque actuelle). Mon-Khmer Studies, 211, 57–89.
. (2009). What were the Four Divisions of Middle Chinese? Diachronica, 26(2), 184–213.
Forest, Alain. (1980). Le Cambodge et la colonisation française: histoire d’une colonisation sans heurts (1897–1920). Paris: L’Harmattan.
. (1992). Le cultes des génies protecteurs au Cambodge. Analyse et traduction d’un corpus de textes sur les neak-ta. Paris: L’Harmattan.
François, Alexandre. (2005). Unraveling the history of the vowels of seventeen northern Vanuatu languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 44(2), 443–504.
Glazer, Nathan & Moynihan, Daniel P. (1970). Beyond the Melting Pot. The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Goddard, Cliff (Ed.) (2006). Ethnopragmatics. Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Groslier, Bernard-Philippe. (1958). Angkor et le Cambodge au XVIè siècle d’après les sources portugaises et espagnoles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell H. (1972). Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hagège, Claude, & André-G. Haudricourt. (1978). La phonologie panchronique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Hansen, Ruth Anne. (2007). How to Behave. Buddhism and Modernity in Colonial Cambodia, 1860–1930. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Harris, Ian. (2004). Cambodian Buddhism. History and Practice. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Haudricourt, André-G. (1940). Méthode pour obtenir des lois concrètes en linguistique générale. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 41(1), 70–74.
(1959). “历史和地理怎样可以解释某些语音上的发展 [Lìshǐ hé dìlǐ zěnyàng kěyǐ jiěshì mǒu xiē yǔyīn shàng de fāzhǎn].” 语言研究 [Yǔyán yánjiū], 41, 81–86.
Huffman, Franklin E. (1973). Thai and Cambodian – a case of syntactic borrowing? Journal of the American Oriental Society, 93(4), 488–509.
Hymes, Dell H. (1962). The Ethnography of Speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. C. Sturtevant (Eds.), Anthropology and Human Behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington D.C.: Anthropology Society of Washington.
Jacob, Judith M. (1976). An examination of the vowels and final consonants in correspondences between pre-Angkor and modern Khmer. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies, 21, 19–38.
Jacques, Claude. (1984). Review of Michael T. Vickery’s Cambodia after Angkor, the Chronicular evidence for the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries, a dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in the candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, December 1977. Produced in 1979 and published on demand by University Microfilm International, Ann Arbor & London. Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 731, 359–366.
. (1988). L’épigraphie khmère et les problèmes de l’histoire. Dossiers Histoire et Archéologie (mars), 1251, 14–20.
Jenkins, Richard. (1997). Rethinking Ethnicity. Arguments and Explorations. London: sage Publications.
Jenner, Philip N. (1976). The value of i, ī, u and ū in Middle Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies, 51, 101–133.
(2009a). A Dictionary of pre-Angkorian Khmer. Canberra: The Australian National University. (Edited by Doug Cooper).
(2009b). A Dictionary of Angkorian Khmer. Canberra: The Australian National University. (Edited by Doug Cooper).
Mak Phœn (1995). Histoire du Cambodge de la fin du XVIè siècle au début du XVIIIè. Paris: Presses de l’EFEO.
Malleret, Louis. (1963). L’archéologie du delta du Mékong, IV. Le Cisbassac. Paris: Publications de l’ÉFEO.
Marston, John & Elizabeth Guthrie (Eds.) (2004). History, Buddhism, and New Religious Movements in Cambodia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Martin, Marie Alexandrine. (1969–70). Manuscrit non-publié sur le khmer des Cadamomes (Tatey Lœ, Russey Chrum, Chke Prus et Thung Kran).
. (1974). Les Pear, agriculteurs-cueilleurs du Massif des Cardamomes (Cambodge). Études Rurales, 53–61, 439–447.
. (1975). Le dialecte cambodgien parlé à Tatey, massif des Cardamomes. Asie du Sud-Est et Monde Insulindien, 6(4), 71–79.
. (1991). Le phnom yong, monument funéraire de l’ouest cambodgien. Cahiers de l’Asie du Sud-Est, 29–301, 297–308.
. (1992). Histoire et peuplement du Massif des Cardamomes sous la monarchie khmère. In Georges Condominas (Ed.), Disciplines croisées. Hommage à Bernard Philippe Groslier (pp. 219–254). Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
. (1997). Les Khmers Daeum, “Khmers de l’Origine”. Société montagnarde et exploitation de la forêt. De l’écologie à l’histoire. Paris: Presses de l’ÉFEO.
McHale, Shawn. (2013). Ethnicity, violence, and Khmer-Vietnamese Relations: the significance of the Lower Mekong Delta, 1757–1954. Journal of Asian Studies, 72(2), 367–90.
Michaud, Alexis, Jacques Guillaume, & Rankin, Robert L. (2012). Historical Transfer of Nasality Between Consonantal Onset and Vowel. From C to V or from V to C? Diachronica, 29(2), 201–30.
Pain, Frédéric. (2017a). Towards a Panchronic Perspective on a Diachronic Issue: The Rhyme <-uiw> in Old Burmese. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 37(4), 424–464.
. (2017b). Local vs. Trans-regional Perspectives on Southeast Asian ‘Indianness’. Anthropological Forum. A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology, 27(2), 135–154.
(2018). A Semiotic Approach to ‘Ethnicity’. An Example from Taiwanese ‘Chineseness’. Asian Ethnicity, 19(4), 528–549.
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. (1979). Reflections on the history of the Khmer phonemic system. Mon-Khmer Studies, 81, 103–30.
Reid, Anthony. (1988). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680. Vol.1: The Lands below the Winds. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Robinne, François. (2000). Emergence of a Leading Group: A Case Study of the Inter-Ethnic Relationships in the Southern Shan State. In Jean Michaud (Ed.), Turbulent Times and Enduring Peoples. Mountain Minorities in the South-East Asian Massif (pp. 151–163). London: Curzon.
Shorto, Harry L. (2006). A Mon-Khmer Comparative Dictionary. Canberra: the Australian National University. (Edited by Paul Sidwell, Doug Cooper, & Christian Bauer).
Sidwell, Paul. (2009). Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: History and State of the Art. München: Lincom Europa.
Smalley, William A. (1994). Linguistic Diversity and National Unity. Language Ecology in Thailand. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, J. L. (1993). Forest Monks and the Nation-State. An Anthropological and Historical Study in Northeastern Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Taylor, Philip. (2014). The Khmer Lands of Vietnam. Environment, Cosmology and Sovereignty. Honolulu: university of Hawai‘i Press.
Uraisi Varasarin (1984). Les éléments khmers dans la formation de la langue siamoise. Leuven: Peeters.
Vail, Peter. (2007). Thailand’s Khmer as ‘Invisible Minority’: Language, Ethnicity and Cultural Politics in North-Eastern Thailand. Asian Ethnicity, 8(2), 111–130.
Vickery, Michael. ([1977] 1979). Cambodia after Angkor: the chronicular evidence for the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University microfilms. [Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in the candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, December 1977]
. (2004). Cambodia and Its Neighbors in the 15th Century. Asia Research Institute, Working Papers Series, 271, 1–71.
Wayland, Ratree. (1998). An accoustic study of Battambang Khmer vowels. Mon-Khmer Studies, 281, 43–62.
Weber, Max. ([1922] 1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Edited by G. Roth & Wittich, C.)
Wierzbicka, Anna. (1979). Ethno-syntax and the philosophy of grammar. Studies in Language, 3(3), 313–83.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
