Article published In: International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 10:1 (2023) ► pp.33–53
Conceptualization of Sar (Head) in Persian figurative expressions
Published online: 7 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00044.aha
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00044.aha
Abstract
Since (1999). Philosophy
in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books. proposed ‘Embodiment theory’ in
Cognitive Linguistics, the relationship between language and body parts has been a subject of research for many years. This paper
examines the conceptualization of body part ‘head’ in 305 Persian figurative expressions and proverbs in two related Iranian
dictionaries. Using the ‘Cultural Conceptualization’ model introduced by (2011). Cultural
conceptualizations and
language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. , this article demonstrates how sar, the Persian equivalent to ‘head’, is conceptualized to
convey various notions such as mental activity, emotions, personality traits, social behavior and state, time, place, death,
measurement, leader, and success. The conceptualization of body parts in a language can be bounded to that language and often
rooted in some cultural background; however, this topic has received scant attention among scholars of Persian language.
Apparently, no comprehensive studies on the conceptualization of head in Persian figurative expressions have been conducted so
far, thus this research is an attempt to fill this gap. The analysis of the afore-mentioned word revealed that it can convey
several meanings; these include mental activity, emotions, human traits, social action and status, time, location, death,
measurement, leadership and success. The variety of meanings stems from contexts within which the word is presented.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical assumptions
- 2.1Cultural conceptualization
- 2.2Conceptualization of body parts
- 3.Methodology and data analysis
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1sar (‘head’) and conceptualizations of mental activity
- 4.2Sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of emotions and feelings
- 4.3sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of character traits
- 4.4Sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of social actions, status and relations
- 4.5Sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of time, place and orientation
- 4.6Sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of measurement
- 4.7Sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of leadership/better/success
- 4.8Sar (‘head’) and conceptualization of death
- 5.Conclusion
References
References (34)
Aksan, M. (2011). The
apocalypse happens when the feet take the position of the head: Figurative uses of ‘head’ and ‘feet’ in
Turkish”. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and
cultures (pp. 241–25). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bacz, B. (2009). What’s
in the head? Metaphorical expressions in Polish and English. LACUS Forum 27. Speaking and
Comprehending. Rice University. 63–74.
Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I. (2014). The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment. Leiden: Brill.
Cole, M. (1998). Cultural
psychology: A once & future
discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Enfield, N. J., & Wierzbicka, A. (2002). The
body in description of emotion. Crosslinguistic studies. Special issue
of Pragmatics &
Cognition 101 1–2, 1–25
Greenough, J. B., & Kittredge, G. L. (1920). Words
and their ways in English speech. New York/London: Macmillan. (Reprint of 1901, available
on-line at [URL])
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. (2002). World
lexicon of grammaticalization (1st
Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B. & Song, K. (2010). On
the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and
Cognition 2 (1), 117–147.
Johnson, M. (1987). The
body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Z. (1999). Metaphor:
Does it constitute or reflect cultural models?. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 167–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kraska-Szlenk, I. (2014). Semantics
of body part terms: General trends and a case study of
Swahili. München: LINCOM Europa.
Kraska-Szlenk, I. & et al. (2019). Embodiment
in cross-linguistic studies: The Head. Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and
Culture 201, XII–272.
(1999). Philosophy
in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Maalej, Z. (2014). Body
parts we live by in language and culture: The ras ‘head’ and yidd ‘hand’ in Tunisian
Arabic. In I. Kraska-Szlenk & M. Brenzinger (Eds), The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment (pp. 224–259). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Mol, S. (2004). ‘Head’
and ‘Heart’: Metaphors and metonymies in a cross-linguistic
perspective. In H. Hasselgård & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Translation
and
corpora (pp.87–11). Gothemborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Niemeier, S. (2008). To
be in control: Kind-hearted and cool-headed. The headheart dichotomy in
English. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu & S. Niemeier (Eds), Culture,
body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and
languages (pp. 349–372). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles
of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition
and
categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2011). Cultural
conceptualizations and
language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (2008). Culture,
body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and
languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siahaan, P. (2011). Head
and eye in German and Indonesian figurative uses. In Z. Maalej and N. Yu (Eds), Embodiment
via body
parts (pp. 93–114). Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins.
Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. (1999). Culture,
cognition and evolution. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds), MIT
encyclopaedia of the cognitive
sciences (pp. Cxi–cxxxii). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Szczygłowska, T. (2014). Selected
body part terms as a means for conveying abstract concepts in The Economist: The case of head, eye, mouth and
nose. In M. Brenzinger & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds), The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment (pp. 335–356). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
Talmy, L. (1983). How
language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial
orientation: Theory, research, and
application (pp. 225–282). New York: Springer New York.
Will, I. (2019). The
conceptualization of head among the Hausa based on verbal and nonverbal
representations. Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and
Culture 201, 157–182.
Yu, Ning. (2003). Metaphor, Body, and Culture: The Chinese Understanding of Gallbladder and Courage. Metaphor and Symbol 181, 13–31.
Yu, N. (2013). The
body in anatomy: Looking at ‘head’ for the mind-body link in
Chinese. In: Caballero, R., & Diaz-Vera, J. (Eds.), Sensuous
cognition explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e) motion and perception (applications of cognitive linguistics
series, 22). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 53–73.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
