Cover not available

Article published In: The Conceptualization of ‘Beautiful’ and ‘Ugly’ across Languages and Cultures
Edited by Anna Gladkova and Jesús Romero-Trillo
[International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1] 2021
► pp. 106–127

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Is ugliness in the mind of the beholder?

The conceptualization of ‘ugly’ in English

 | Monash University | Australian National University
 | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Published online: 7 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00037.gla
Abstract
The paper explores the meaning and use of ugly in English. The study is based on corpus data from Cobuild Wordbanks Online and investigates the polysemy and the spheres of application of the concept. Through corpus analysis methodology, we investigate the most common collocations and the pragmatic and contextual uses of the term. Based on this analysis, our study proposes semantic explications of ugly in universal human concepts within the theoretical framework of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM). We also analyze the most common collocations with the word ugly and classify them into several meaning-based categories. A comparison between beautiful and ugly reveals that they are not identical in their distribution, which suggests different cognitive salience of the concepts. We also note the special role of ‘people’ and ‘nature’ in conceptualization and use of beautiful and that of ‘human actions’ in ugly.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology and framework
  • 3.The semantic analysis of ugly based on corpus data
    • 3.1The polysemy of ugly
    • 3.2Ugly1
    • 3.3Ugly2
    • 3.4Ugly3
  • 4.Ugly and beautiful, can they be compared?
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (54)
References
Adorno, T. W. ([1970] 2013). Aesthetic Theory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anonymous. (2007). Ugly. The Ecologist 37(8), 42–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apresjan, J. (1992). Lexical Semantics: user’s guide to contemporary Russian vocabulary. [Translation of Apresjan, J. (1974). Leksičeskaja semantika: sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka.]. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cobuild Wordbanks Online [CWO] [URL]
Cunningham, M., Roberts, A., Barbee, A., Druen, P. & Wu, C-H. (1995). Their Ideas of Beauty Are, on the Whole, the Same as Ours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(2), 261–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Andrade, R. (1987). A folk model of the mind. In Holland, D. & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (pp. 112–148). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009). The Art Instinct. Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eco, U. (2004). History of Beauty. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). On Ugliness. London: Harvill Secker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenko, A., Otten, J. & H. Schifferstein. (2010). Describing product experience in different languages: The role of sensory modalities. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 3314–3327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraenkel, T. & Y. Schul. (2008). The meaning of negated adjectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4), 517–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(3), 223–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Polysemy. In Asher, R. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 3227–3228). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladkova, A. (2020a). The semantics of verbs of visual aesthetic appreciation in Russian. In Bromhead, H. and Z. Ye (Eds), Meaning, Life and Culture: In Conversation with Anna Wierzbicka. ANU Press: Canberra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020b). When Value Words Cross Cultural Borders: English Tolerant vs. Russian Tolerantnyj. In Sadow, L. et al. (Eds.), Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics and Intercultural Communication (pp. 73–93). Singapore: Springer Nature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this issue). “What is beauty?” Cultural semantics of the Russian folk aesthetics.
Gladkova, A. & J. Romero-Trillo. (2014). Ain’t it beautiful? The conceptualization of beauty from an ethnopragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 140–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladkova, A. & Romero-Trillo, J. (this issue). The linguistic conceptualization in folk aesthetics.
Gladkova, A., Vanhatalo, U. & C. Goddard. (2016). The semantics of interjections: An experimental study with Natural Semantic Metalanguage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 371, 841–865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2000). Polysemy: a problem of definition. In Ravin, Y. & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 129–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. (2014). On “Disgust”. In Baider, Fabienne & Georgeta Cislaru (eds.), Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context, 73–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2018). Ten Lectures on Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Exploring language, thought and culture using simple translatable words. Amsterdam: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages & Cultures. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C. & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.). (2002). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, 21 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (2005). Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, G. (2015). Ugliness: A Cultural History. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, D., Chaffin, R., Contin, G., Peters, D. & P. Robbins. (1979). Comprehension of antonymy and the generality of categorization models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 51, 585–597.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, S., Murphy, L., Paradis, C. & C. Willners. (2012). Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolnai, A. (2004). On Disgust. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levisen, C. (this issue). Pæn, Flot, Dejlig, and Lækker: A Lexical Anthropology of Danish Folk Aesthetics.
Lizardo, O. (2012). The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 367–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A. & S. Levinson (Eds.). (2011). The senses in language and culture [Special Issue]. Senses and Society, 6(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W. (2003). Disgust: The Theory and History of a Strong Sensation. [Translated from German by H. Eiland and J. Golb.] Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, J. (2014). Horace, Colors, and Pragmatics. In Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: New empirical and theoretical paradigms (pp. 99–121). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ozyumenko, V. & Larina, T. (2018). Understanding Social Values and Attitudes through Cultural Semantics: tolerance vs. tolerantnost’. INTCESS18 Proceedings. 5th International conference on education and social sciences, 5–7 February, 2018, Istanbul, Turkey, 589–595.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pop, A. & Mechtild, W. (2014). Ugliness: The Non-beautiful in Art and Theory. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.) (2008). Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Editorial. Corpus Pragmatics 11, 1–2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. & Espigares, T. (2012). The cognitive representation of natural landscapes in language. Pragmatics and Cognition, 201, 168–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting the selection of landscapes in the Corpus of Language and Nature. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 21, 157–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. & Fuentes, V. (2017). What is pretty cannot be beautiful? A corpus-based analysis of the aesthetics of nature. In Blochowiak, J., Grisot, C., Durrleman, S., & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal models in the study of language (pp. 415–430). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. & Maguire, L. (2011). Adaptive Context, the fourth element of meaning. International Review of Pragmatics, 31, 228–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, K. (1853). Aesthetik des Hässlichen. Königsberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1944). On grading: a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 21, 93–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sartwell, C. (2004). Six Names of Beauty. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorokowski, P., Kościński, K., & Sorokowska, A. (2013). Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder but Ugliness Culturally Universal? Facial preferences of Polish and Yali (Papua) People. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(4), 907–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, M., Trnavac, R., & Goddard, C. (2017). On Being Negative. Corpus Pragmatics, 11, 57–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tayebi, T. (this issue). Conceptualisations of ugly and beautiful: An analysis of im/politeness metapragmatic markers in Persian.
Trier, J. (1931). Der Deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zangwill, N. (2001). The Metaphysics of Beauty. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Alemi, Minoo & Zia Tajeddin
2025. Cultural Conceptualizations and ELT Curriculum. In Cultural Linguistics and ELT Curriculum [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tajeddin, Zia & Abbas Mansouri
2025. Women’s Beauty and Body Image as Culturally Conceptualized in Global ELT Textbooks. In Cultural Linguistics and ELT Curriculum [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Trillo, Jesús & Irina Rozina
2023. Is there justice in this world? A cross-cultural pragmatic analysis of the conceptualisation of ‘justice’. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 18:1 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue