Cover not available

Article published In: Intercultural Pragmatics and Cultural Linguistics
Edited by Ulrike Schröder, Milene Mendes de Oliveira and Hans-Georg Wolf
[International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1] 2020
► pp. 84–103

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Heterogeneous distribution of cultural conceptualizations and (im)politeness evaluations

 | Aston University
Published online: 8 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00028.tay
Abstract
The argumentative and variable nature of (im)politeness evaluations and perceptions has long been discussed by scholars working in the field. The variability found in the perception of (im)politeness norms is arguably one of the most important and fundamental components of (im)politeness research. By using a three-stage analysis and drawing on several authentic examples from Persian, the present study uses the notion of ‘heterogeneous distribution of cultural conceptualizations’ to account for instances where differences arise in the conceptualization of (im)politeness in Persian interactions. It will be argued that evaluations of (im)polite behavior vary according to people’s level of internalization of the cultural conceptualizations. Furthermore, this study will also address some of the most significant social and cultural factors that cause variability in people’s evaluations of what is impolite and why it is so.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Variability in evaluations of (im)politeness
  • 3.Methodology and data
  • 4.Analysis of examples from Persian
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Note
  • References
References (64)
References
Asdjodi, M. (2001). A comparison between Ta’arof in Persian and Limao in Chinese. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1481, 71–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Assadi, R. (1980). Deference: Persian style. Anthropological Linguistics, 221, 221–224.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeman, W. (1986). Language, status and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blitvich, P. G. C. (2010). A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics, 2(1), 46–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blitvich, G. P., Patricia, B., & Nuria, L. (2013). Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show idol. Journal of Politeness Research, 9(1), 97–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. Philadelphia, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. (Eds.) (2008). Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 251, 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The weakest link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 11, 35–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In D. Bousfield, & M. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 17–44). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). (Im)politeness: Three issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 441, 1128–1133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 351, 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Marti, L., Mei, M., Nevala, M., & Schauer, G. (2010). Cross-cultural variation in the perception of impoliteness: A study of impoliteness events reported by students in England, China, Finland, Germany, and Turkey. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(4), 597–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M. V. (1998). Politeness: A relevant issue for relevance theory. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 111, 45–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, R. M. (2008). The language-organism-species analogy: A complex adaptive systems approach to shifting perspectives on ‘language.’ In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 215–262). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). A future agenda for research on language and culture. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 493–512). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukushima, S., & Haugh, M. (2014). The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 741, 165–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11(3), 225–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2008). Intention in pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(2), 99–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Face and interaction. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social interaction (pp. 1–30). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 61, 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, 581, 52–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Kádár, D. Z. (2017). Intercultural (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 601–631). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Y. (2012). Different generations, different face? A discursive approach to naturally occurring compliment responses in Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research, 81, 29–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hillman, M. (1981). Language and social distinctions in Iran. In M. Bonine, & N. Keddie (Eds.), Modern Iran: The dialects of continuity and change (pp. 327–340). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, C. (1957). Some aspects of Persian style. Language, 331, 355–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Tæ’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 1733–1756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. (2013). Relational rituals and communication: Ritual interaction in groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Politeness, impoliteness and ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2010). Introduction: Politeness research in and across cultures. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), Politeness across cultures (pp. 1–15). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmilan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Mills, S. (2011). Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., Parvaresh, V., & Ning, P. (2019). Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression: A position paper. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 6-31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Tæ’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 1733–1756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2006). Polite behaviour within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua, 25(3), 249–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 11, 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 77–99). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Politeness and culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1047–1060. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S., & Kádár, D. Z. (2011). Politeness and culture. In D. Z. Kádár, & S. Mills (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 21–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. (2019). Moral impoliteness. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 79-104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Tayebi, T. (2014). Vaguely speaking in Persian. Discourse Processes, 51(7), 565–600. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 1321, 91-107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F., & Tayebi, T. (2017a). Cultural linguistics and impoliteness: A case study from Persian. Pragmatics and Society, 8(2) 231–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Perceptions of impoliteness from a cultural linguistics perspective. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in Cultural linguistics (pp. 389–409). Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 95–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.) (2011). Enactivism: Towards a new paradigm in cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tayebi, T. (2016). Why do people take offence? Exploring the underlying expectations. Journal of Pragmatics, 1011, 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Implying an impolite belief: The case of tikkeh in Persian. Intercultural Pragmatics. 15(1), 89–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tayebi, T., & Parvaresh, V. (2014). Conversational disclaimers in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 621, 77–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2001). Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge: Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, V. L., Taylor, J. S., Woolstenhulme, S. L., & Wilkins, E. J. (1978). Reading between the lines. Provo, Utah: Eyring Research Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 4(2), 289–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Abbaszadeh, Elnaz & Ali Dabbagh
2024. “You have no right!”. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Arab, Reza
2024. Metapragmatics of Maze (Taste) in Persian. In The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics [Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics, ], ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Safari, Saeed
2024. Language, conceptualization, and cultural linguistics. The role of culture in the formation of cognitive schemas in languages. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta 72:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
2021. Taking offence at the (un)said:Towards a more radical contextualist approach. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2021. Conceptualizations of ugly and beautiful. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue