Cover not available

Introduction published In: Intercultural Pragmatics and Cultural Linguistics
Edited by Ulrike Schröder, Milene Mendes de Oliveira and Hans-Georg Wolf
[International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1] 2020
► pp. 1–14

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Introduction

Intercultural Pragmatics and Cultural Linguistics

 | Federal University of Minas Gerais – UFMG
 | University of Potsdam
 | University of Potsdam
Published online: 8 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00024.int
Article outline
  • 1.From Cognitive to Cultural Linguistics: Going beyond the individual
  • 2.From Cross-Cultural to Intercultural Pragmatics: Going beyond linguistic function
  • 3.Politeness and face
  • 4.World Englishes and English as lingua franca
  • 5.The contributions
  • References
References (52)
References
Arundale, R. B. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 2078–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 581, 108–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bachmann-Medick, D. (2009). Cultural turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1998). Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 131–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busch, D. (2015). Culture is leaving conversation analysis, but is it really gone? Journal of Intercultural Communication, 391, [URL]
Chang, W.-L. M. (2016). Face and face practices in Chinese talk-in-interaction. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charlebois, J. (2006). Community of practice involvement obligations. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 121, [URL]
Covarrubias, P. O. (2002). Culture, communication and cooperation: Interpersonal relations and pronominal address in a Mexican organization. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreher, J. (2007). Konstitutionsprinzipien ‘kultureller Differenz’: Zur Analyse der Konstruktion kultureller Grenzbestimmungen in grundlagentheoretischer Absicht. In J. Dreher & P. Stegmaier (Eds.), Zur Unüberwindbarkeit kultureller Differenz. Grundlagentheoretische Reflexionen (pp. 129–151). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernandez, J. W. (1991) (Ed.). Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Földes, C. (2003). Interkulturelle Linguistik. Vorüberlegungen zu Konzepten, Problemen und Desiderata. Wien: Universitätsverlag Veszprém.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2016). The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 527–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2007). Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 657–680. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M., & Kádár, D. Z. (2017). Intercultural (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 601–632). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations : software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskés, I. (2010). Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2889–2897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Language, culture, and context. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 113–128). Oxford, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Deliberate creativity and formulaic language use. In A. Keith, A. Capone & I. Kecskés (Eds.), Pragmemes and theories of language use. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology (pp. 3–20). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003 [1980]). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendes de Oliveira. (2020). Business negotiations in ELF from a cultural linguistic perspective. [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 43]. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oksaar, E. (2003). Zweitspracherwerb. Wege zur Mehrsprachigkeit und zur interkulturellen Verständigung. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, U. (2012). Kommunikationstheoretische Fragestellungen in der kognitiven Metaphernforschung. Eine Betrachtung von ihren Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthcoming). Jeitinho as a cultural conceptualisation in Brazilian Portuguese: a cultural linguistics' approach to talk-in-interaction. In Neele Mundt & Arne Peters (Eds.), Applied Cultural Linguistics. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Schröder, U., & Carneiro Mendes, M. (2018). ‘The game is rigged’: Framing real life metaphorically in the TV-epic ‘The Wire’. Text & Talk, 38(1), 47–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senkbeil, K. (2017). Figurative language in intercultural communication – a case study of German-Southern African international academic discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(4), 465–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Cultural Linguistics and intercultural communication. In F. Sharifian & M. Jamarani (Eds.), Language and Intercultural Communication in the new era (pp. 60–79). New York, London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cultural Linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Cultural pragmatic schemas, pragmemes, and practs: A Cultural Linguistics perspective. In K. Allan, A. Capone & I. Kecskés (Eds.), Pragmemes and theories of language use (pp. 505–519). New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind. Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking. Culture, communication and politeness theory (pp. 11–47). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ten Thije, J. D. (2006). The notion of ‘perspective’ and ‘perspectivising’ in intercultural communication research. In K. Bührig & J. D. ten Thije (Eds.), Beyond misunderstanding. The linguistic analysis of intercultural communication (pp. 97–153). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1998). German ‘cultural scripts’: Public signs as a key to social attitudes and cultural values. Discourse & Society, 9(2), 241–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003 [1991]). Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, H.-G. (2015). Language and culture in Intercultural Communication. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 445–459). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, H-G., & Polzenhagen, F. (2006a). Intercultural communication in English: Arguments for a cognitive approach to intercultural pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(3), 285–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, H.-G., & Polzenhagen, F. (2006b). Intercultural communication in English – A cognitive linguistic focus on neglected issues. Essen: LAUD 2006, Paper No. 683, Universität Duisburg-Essen, [URL], 1–31.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Schröder, Ulrike
2024. “Open and Closed People” as and in containers: Breaking Down Cultural Conceptualizations in Multimodal Communication. In The Handbook of Cultural Linguistics [Springer Handbooks in Languages and Linguistics, ], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Wolf, Hans-Georg, Denisa Latić & Anna Finzel
2021. Introduction. In Cultural-Linguistic Explorations into Spirituality, Emotionality, and Society [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 14], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue