Article published In: From Culture to Language and Back: The Animacy Hierarchy in language and discourse
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[International Journal of Language and Culture 5:2] 2018
► pp. 224–247
Animals, animacy and anthropocentrism
Published online: 28 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00008.sea
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00008.sea
Abstract
This paper explores various ways in which contemporary British English depicts degrees of animacy among nonhuman animals, and demonstrates the anthropocentric qualities of much discourse about animals. The first section reviews discussions of animacy in relevant research literature, highlighting how these often take for granted a categorical distinction between humans and other animals, before demonstrating how both corpus-assisted approaches to discourse analysis and developments in the analysis of animacy point to a more complex picture. The second section discusses the implications of recent work in social theory for understanding organisms, and their degrees of animacy, from the perspective of networks rather than hierarchies. The third section of the paper presents analyses of an electronically stored corpus of language about animals. Three analyses of naming terms, descriptors and verbal patterns associated with various non-human animals illustrate a range of ways in which their animacy is denoted and connoted. They also demonstrate the influence of discourse type and human purpose on depictions of animals and assumptions about their animacy.
Keywords: animacy, anthropocentrism, animals, corpus assisted discourse analysis
Article outline
- Introduction
- Animacy: Hierarchies and taxonomies
- Linguistic markers of animacy
- Humans and other animals as networks
- A corpus of texts about animals
- Approaches to analysis
- Analysis 1: Subject animals in scientific journal articles
- Analysis 2: Animals compared across the whole corpus
- Analysis 3: Contrasting representations of dogs
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (61)
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3). Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved from [URL]
Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. R. (1996). The sociozoologic scale. In A. Arluke & C. R. Sanders (Eds.), Regarding Animals (pp. 167–186). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Atran, S. (1999). The universal primacy of generic species in folkbiological taxonomy: implications for human biological, cultural and scientific evolution. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: new interdisciplinary essays (pp. 231–261). Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in Media Discourse: analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: A&C Black.
Bhatia, V. K., Langton, N. M., & Lung, J. (2004). Legal discourse: opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (Vol. 161, pp. 203–231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Birke, L. (2012). Animal bodies in the production of scientific knowledge: modelling medicine. Body & Society, 18(3–4), 156–178.
Burghardt, G. M. (1991). Cognitive ethology and critical anthropomorphism: a snake with two heads and hognose snakes that play dead. In C. A. Ristau (Ed.), Cognitive ethology: the minds of other animals. Essays in honor of Donald R. Griffin (pp. 53–90). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Charles, N. (2014). “Animals just love you as you are”: experiencing kinship across the species barrier. Sociology, 48(4), 715–730.
Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Aristotle, the scale of nature, and modern attitudes to animals. Social Research, 421–440.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: syntax and morphology: University of Chicago press.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010a). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43).
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: the cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, O. (2000). Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In B. Unterbeck (Ed.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition (Vol. 1241, pp. 99–116).
Dahl, O., & Fraurud, K. (1996). Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Reference and Referent Accessibility (pp. 47–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Swart, P., Lamers, M., & Lestrade, S. (2008). Animacy, argument structure, and argument encoding. Lingua, 118(2), 131–140.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A Thousand Plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury
DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: an introduction to human-animal studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
Despret, V. (2016). What Would Animals Say if we Asked the Right Questions? (B. Buchanan, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dupré, J. (1999). Are whales fish? In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 461–476). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dupré, J., & O’Malley, M. A. (2007). Metagenomics and biological ontology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 381, 834–846.
Enger, H. -O., & Nesset, T. (2011). Constraints on diachronic development: the Animacy Hierarchy and the Relevance Constraint. STUF-Language Typology and Universals Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 64(3), 193–212.
Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2008). Teleology and animacy in external arguments. Lingua: Animacy, Argument Structure, and Argument Encoding, 118(2), 190–192 102.
Gilquin, G., & Jacobs, G. M. (2006). Elephants who marry mice are very unusual: the use of the relative pronoun who with nonhuman animals. Society & Animals, 14(1), 79–105.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2013). Cephalopods and the evolution of the mind. Pacific Conservation Biology, 19(1), 4–9.
Halliday, M. A. K. ([1990] 2001). New ways of meaning: the challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader (pp. 175–202). London & New York: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Herzog, H. (2010). Some We Love, Some We hate, Some We Eat: why it’s so hard to think straight about animals. New York: Harper Perennial.
Hird, M. J. (2009). The Origins of Sociable Life: evolution after science studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1994). Language universals, discourse pragmatics, and semantics. Language Sciences, 15(4), 357–376.
Jensen, F. H., & Tyack, P. L. (2013). Studying acoustic communication in pilot whale social groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(5).
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. II1 Descriptive Application). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Leheckovd, H. (2000). Use and misuse of gender in Czech. In B. Unterbeck (Ed.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition (Vol. 1241, pp. 749–770).
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity (Vol. 51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malchukov, A. L. (2008). Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua, 118(2), 203–221.
Marino, L., & Colvin, C. M. (2015). Thinking pigs: a comparative review of cognition, emotion, and personality in sus domesticus. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 28.
Mosel, U. & Spriggs, R. (2000). Gender in Teop. In B. Unterbeck (Ed.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition: I: Approaches to Gender. II: Manifestations of Gender (pp. 321–350). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Nussbaum, M. (2007). The moral status of animals. In L. Kalof & A. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The Animals Reader (pp. 30–36). Oxford & New York: Berg.
Rabinowitz, H., & Vogel, S. (Eds.). (2009). The Manual of Scientific Style: a guide for authors, editors, and researchers: Academic Press.
Santamaria, S. L., Fallon, M., Green, J. M., Schulz, S., & Wilcke, J. R. (2012). Developing the animals in context ontology. Paper presented at the ICBO.
Sealey, A., & Oakley, L. (2013). Anthropomorphic grammar? Some linguistic patterns in the wildlife documentary series Life
. Text & Talk, 33(3), 399–420.
Sealey, A., & Pak, C. (forthcoming in 2018). First catch your corpus: methodological challenges in constructing a thematic corpus. Corpora, 13(2).
Stibbe, A. (2006). Deep ecology and language: the curtailed journey of the Atlantic salmon. Society & Animals, 14(1), 61–77.
Tudge, C. (2000). The Variety of Life: a survey and a celebration of all the creatures that have ever lived. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yamamoto, M. (1999). Animacy and Reference: a cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Clancy, Cara, Emma McClaughlin & Fiona Cooke
Schmitt, Casey R.
2023. Anthropomorphism, anthropocentrism, and human-orientation in environmental discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 22:5 ► pp. 601 ff.
Micalay-Hurtado, Marco A. & Robert Poole
Bouchard, Jérémie
Bouchard, Jérémie
Sealey, Alison
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
