Cover not available

Article published In: Corpus-based Approaches to Spoken L2 Production: Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus
Edited by Vaclav Brezina, Dana Gablasova and Tony McEnery
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:2] 2019
► pp. 181–206

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Light verb constructions in spoken L2 English

An exploratory cross-sectional study

 | Université catholique de Louvain
Published online: 24 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.18003.gil
Abstract
Light verb constructions (LVCs), that is, combinations like take a walk or make a choice, are often claimed to be problematic for non-native speakers of English. In this paper, spoken data from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus are used to explore the use of these constructions across different sections of the corpus, representing different proficiency levels (from lower intermediate to upper advanced) as well as different types of acquisitional contexts, namely English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). The results of the study reveal a tendency towards an increased frequency of LVCs, as well as more complex and abstract uses, as we move from an intermediate to an advanced level and from an EFL to an ESL context. For the EFL speakers, this development corresponds to a better approximation to native English. For the ESL speakers, on the other hand, LVCs seem to have become ‘constructional teddy bears’, used more often than by the native speakers themselves.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Light verb constructions: Definition and use in L2 English
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Light verb constructions in EFL
    • 4.1Frequency of light verb constructions in EFL
    • 4.2Frequency of light verb constructions across proficiency levels in EFL
    • 4.3Formal aspects of light verb constructions in EFL
  • 5.Light verb constructions in EFL and ESL
    • 5.1Frequency of light verb constructions in EFL and ESL
    • 5.2Frequency of light verb constructions across proficiency levels in EFL and ESL
    • 5.3Formal aspects of light verb constructions in EFL and ESL
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Allerton, D. J. 2002. Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, B. & Granger, S. 2001. “The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing”. Applied Linguistics 22(2), 173–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B. & Poonpon, K. 2011. “Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?”. TESOL Quarterly 45(1), 5–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, C. 2001. “Light verbs and polysemy”. Language Sciences 23(4–5), 551–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B. & Housen, A. 2012. “Defining and operationalising L2 complexity”. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “Evaluating short-term changes in L2 complexity development”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 631, 42–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, M. & Geuder, W. 2001. “On the (semi)lexical status of light verbs”. In N. Corver & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Semi-lexical Categories: The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 323–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S. & Jarvis, S. 2011. “What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data”. TESOL Quarterly 45(1), 182–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, A., Miles, J. & Field, Z. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. 2007. “To err is not all. What corpus and elicitation can reveal about the use of collocations by learners”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55(3), 273–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Language production: A window to the mind?”. In H. Götzsche (Ed.), Memory, Mind and Language. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 89–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Discourse markers in L2 English: From classroom to naturalistic input”. In O. Timofeeva, A.-C. Gardner, A. Honkapohja & S. Chevalier (Eds.), New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building Bridges. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 213–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. 2008. “Learner corpora”. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter, 259–275.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “The passive in learner English. Corpus insights and implications for pedagogical grammar”. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World, Vol. 1: Papers from LCSAW2013. Kobe: School of Languages and Communication, Kobe University, 5–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgren, A. 1994. “Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with vocabulary”. Applied Linguistics 4(2), 237–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Hundt, M. & Mukherjee, J. 2011. “Indian English – An emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes”. Anglia 129(3–4), 258–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juknevičienė, R. 2008. “Collocations with high-frequency verbs in learner English: Lithuanian learners vs native speakers”. Kalbotyra 59(3), 119–127. Available at <[URL]>
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. & Suchomel, V. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on”. Lexicography 1(1), 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kittigosin, R. & Phoocharoensil, S. 2015. “Investigation into learning strategies and delexical verb use by Thai EFL learners”. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature – The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 21(2), 63–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, S. 2004. “A linguistic test battery for support verb constructions”. Linguisticae Investigationes 27(2), 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1997. “Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition”. Applied Linguistics 18(2), 141–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Waldman, T. 2011. “Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English”. Language Learning 61(2), 647–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, F. 2015. “Developmental patterns in learner corpora”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 379–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neff-van Aertselaer, J. & Bunce, C. 2008. “Acquisition of have-constructions in the academic English of Spanish EFL university students: A comparative corpus study”. LAUD Paper No. 718, Universität Duisburg-Essen. Available at <[URL]>
Osborne, J. 2015. “Transfer and learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 333–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheepers, R. 2017. “South African students’ use of delexical multiword units: The trouble with high-frequency verbs”. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 471, 89–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shahrokny-Prehn, A. & Höche, S. 2011. “Rising through the registers – A corpus-based account of the stylistic constraints on Light Verb Constructions”. Corpus 101, 239–257. Available at <[URL]>
Shirato, J. & Stapleton, P. 2007. “Comparing English vocabulary in a spoken learner corpus with a native speaker corpus: Pedagogical implications arising from an empirical study in Japan”. Language Teaching Research 11(4), 393–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (Ed.). 1990. Collins Cobuild English Grammar. London: Collins Cobuild.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, A. 2009. “Light verbs in Australian, New Zealand and British English”. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szudarski, P. 2012. “Effects of meaning- and form-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations in L2 English”. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research 1(2), 3–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szudarski, P. & Carter, R. 2016. “The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 26(2), 245–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1999. “A historical overview of complex predicate types”. In L. J. Brinton & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 239–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, D. 2011. “Language transfer and the acquisition of English light verb + noun collocations by Chinese learners”. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 34(2), 107–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Ong, Christina Sook Beng & Hajar Abdul Rahim
2025.  Give, take, and make light verb constructions in mesolectal Malaysian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 46:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Sung, Hakyung & Kristopher Kyle
2025. Usage-based analysis of L2 oral proficiency: Characteristics of argument structure construction use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 47:4 ► pp. 991 ff. DOI logo
夏, 其瑛
2025. A Contrastive Analysis of Argument Structure of Light Verbs in English and Chinese. Modern Linguistics 13:10 ► pp. 784 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Qin & Wulin Ma
2024. Uses of the Light Verb GET in Chinese EFL Learners’ and English L1 Undergraduates’ Writing: A Corpus-Pattern-Analysis-Based Investigation. Sage Open 14:3 DOI logo
Du, Hang
2022. Grammatical and lexical development during study abroad: Research on a corpus of spoken L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals 55:4 ► pp. 985 ff. DOI logo
Du, Hang
2022. Building a corpus of spoken Chinese interlanguage and some results of preliminary analyses. Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 57:3 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2022. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Gablasova, Dana
2020. Variability. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora, ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue