Cover not available

Review article published In: Learner Corpus Research for Pedagogical Purposes
Edited by Sandra Götz and Sylviane Granger
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:1] 2024
► pp. 1–38

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Introduction

Learner corpus research for pedagogical purposes

An overview and some research perspectives

 | Philipps University Marburg
 | University of Louvain
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Philipps University of Marburg.

Published online: 28 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.00039.got
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Learner corpus data for materials design
    • 2.1Reference tools
    • 2.2Teaching materials
      • 2.2.1Textbooks
      • 2.2.2Local learner corpora for creating situated teaching materials
      • 2.2.3Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) programs
  • 3.Learner corpus data for language testing and assessment
    • 3.1Test development
    • 3.2Learner corpora to inform descriptor scales
    • 3.3Automatic assessment of test and learner data
  • 4.Learner-corpus-based classroom practice
    • 4.1Design features of LC use
    • 4.2Survey of LC-based pedagogical approaches
      • 4.2.1Comparison of learner and native/expert data
      • 4.2.2Error identification and/or correction
    • 4.3Efficiency and perception of LC-based activities
      • 4.3.1Effectiveness
      • 4.3.2Perception
  • 5.Discussion and outlook
  • 6.Outline of the special issue
  • Notes
  • References
References (131)
References
Ackerley, K. (2013). A comparison of learner and native speaker writing in online self-presentations: Pedagogical applications. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, moving ahead (pp. 1–10). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Short-term effects of students’ exploration of corpora: A longitudinal study of pre- and post-modification of noun phrases in learner English. In E. Castello, K. Ackerley, & F. Coccetta (Eds.), Studies in learner corpus linguistics: Research and applications for Foreign Language Teaching and assessment (pp. 199–218). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aston, G. (2008). It’s only human…. In A. Martelli, & V. Pulcini (Eds.), Investigating English with corpora: Studies in honour of Maria Teresa Prat (pp. 343–354). Monza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automatic essay scoring with e-rater® v.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3). [URL]
Barker, F., Salamoura, A., & Saville, N. (2015). Learner corpora and language testing. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 511–533). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belz, J., & Vyatkina, N. (2008). The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 33–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2011). Categorising spelling errors to assess L2 writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 21(2/3), 235–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2012). Hands-on /hands-off: Alternative approaches to data-driven learning. In J. Thomas & A. Boulton (Eds.), Input, process, and product: Developments in teaching and language corpora (pp. 152–168). Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulton, A., & Vyatkina, N. (2021). Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 66–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Prospects and challenges. In M. Callies & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner corpora in language testing and assessment (pp. 1–9). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, M., Dìez-Bedmar, B., & Zaytseva, E. (2014). Using learner corpora for testing and assessment: Current practice and future challenges. In E. Castello, K. Ackerley, & F. Coccetta (Eds.), Studies in Learner Corpus Linguistics: Research and applications for foreign language teaching and assessement (pp. 21–35). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (4th ed.). (2013). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambridge Learner Corpus: A typology of exercises. (2011). [URL]
Campillos Llanos, L. (2012). Designing a search interface for a Spanish learner oral corpus: The end-user’s evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey (pp. 241–248). [URL]
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar Today: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R., McCarthy, M., Mark, G., & O’Keeffe, A. (2011). The English Grammar Today. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, A. (2015). The learner corpus as a pedagogic corpus. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 445–464). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2018). Corpus-assisted editing for doctoral students: More than just concordancing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 361, 15–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuang, F.-Y., & Nesi, H. (2007). Grammar Talk: Developing computer-based materials for Chinese EAP students. In O. Alexander (Ed.), New approaches to materials development for language learning (pp. 315–330). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotos, E. (2014). Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL, 26(2), 202–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2017). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowan, R., Choi, E. E., & Kim, D. H. (2003). Four questions for error diagnosis and correction in CALL. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 451–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowan, R., Choo, J., & Lee, G. S. (2014). ICALL for improving Korean L2 writers’ ability to edit grammatical errors. Language Learning and Technology, 18(3), 193–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, P. (2012). Learner corpus linguistics in the EFL classroom. PASAA Journal, 441, 133–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, S., & Granger, S. (2005). Computer learner corpora and monolingual learners’ dictionaries: The perfect match. Lexicographica, 201, 72–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, B. (2015). Article use and criterial features in Spanish EFL writing: A pilot study from CEFRR A2 to B2 levels. In M. Callies & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner corpora in language testing and assessment (pp. 163–190). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumont, A. (2017). The contribution of learner corpora to the substantiation of fluency levels. In P. De Haan, R. D. Vries, & S. Van Vuuren (Eds.), Language, learners and levels: Progression and variation (pp. 281–308). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falk, S., & Götz, S. (2016). Interactivity in mobile learning applications: A case study based on Duolingo. In T. Zeyer, S. Stuhlmann, & R. D. Jones (Eds.), Interaktivität beim Fremdsprachenlehren und -lernen mit digitalen Medien. Hit oder Hype? (pp. 237–258). Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feak, C. B., Reinhard, S. M., & Rohlck, T. N. (2009). Academic interactions: Communicating on campus. Michigan University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2012). Corpora and language education. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forti, L. (2023a). The learner corpus advantage in data-driven learning activity design. Poster presented at EUROCALL 2023: CALL for all languages, 15–18 August 2023, Reykjavik, University of Iceland.
(2023b). Learner corpora and the design of data-driven learning activities. EUROCALL 2023: CALL for all Languages, 15–18 August 2023, Reykjavik, University of Iceland.
Fuster-Márquez, M., & Gregori-Signes, C. (2018). Learning from learners: A non-standard direct approach to the teaching of writing skills in EFL in a university context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 164–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., & Bottini, R. (2022). Spoken learner corpora for language teaching. In R. R. Jablonkai, & E. Csomay (Eds.), Routledge handbook of corpora in English Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 296–310). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaskell, D., & Cobb, T. (2004). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32(3), 301–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2015). From design to collection of learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 9–34). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Written learner corpora to inform teaching. In R. R. Jablonkai, & E. Csomay (Eds.), Routledge handbook of corpora in English Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 281–295). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, S. (2015). Tense and aspect errors in spoken learner language: Implications for language testing and assessment. In M. Callies, & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner corpora in language testing and assessment (pp. 191–215). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Learner corpora to inform testing and assessment. In R. R. Jablonkai, & E. Csomay (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 311–326). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, S., & Mukherjee, J. (Eds.). (2019). Learner corpora and language teaching. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 145–160). Oxford university press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). A bird’s eye view of learner corpus research. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & J. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 3–33). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and Second Language Acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The contribution of learner corpora to Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching: A critical evaluation. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 13–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The passive in learner English: Corpus insights and implications for pedagogical grammar. In I. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world (pp. 5–15). Kobe University: Kobe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The contribution of learner corpora to reference and instructional materials design. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 485–510). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dupont, M., Meunier, F., Naets, H., & Paquot, M. (2020). The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 3. Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Kraif, O., Ponton, C., Antoniadis, G., & Zampa, V. (2007). Integrating learner corpora and natural language processing: A crucial step towards reconciling technological sophistication and pedagogical effectiveness. ReCALL, 19(3), 252–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: form-focused instruction and data-driven learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 199–209). Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gyllstad, H., & Snoder, P. (2021). Exploring learner corpus data for language testing and assessment purposes: The case of verb + noun collocations. In S. Granger (Ed.), Perspectives on the L2 phrasicon: The view from learner corpora (pp. 49–71). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, N.-R., Tetreault, J., Lee, S. H., & Ha, J. Y. (2010). Using an error-annotated learner corpus to develop an ESL/EFL error correction system. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010). Malta, (pp. 763–770). [URL]
Hargreaves, P. (2000). How important is collocation in testing the learner’s language proficiency? In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation – Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 205–223). Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartle, S. (2023). From learner corpus to data-driven learning (DDL): Improving lexical usage in academic writing. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 10(2), 9–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A., & Buttery, P. (2010). Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1(1), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A., & Filipović, L. (2012). Criterial features in L2 English: Specifying the reference levels of the Common European Framework. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegelheimer, V. (2006). Helping ESL writers through a multimodal, corpus-based, online Grammar Resource. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 5–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegelheimer, V., & Fisher, D. (2006). Grammar, writing, and technology: A sample technology-supported approach to teaching grammar and improving writing for ESL learners. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 257–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heift, T. (2001). Error-specific and individualized feedback in a web-based language tutoring system: Do they read it? ReCALL, 13(2), 129–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heift, T., & Caws, C. (2013). Recycling learner data to construct data-driven learning tools: Practical applications for the learner, the instructor, and the teacher. In Proceedings of the 6th edition of the ICT for Language Learning Conference. Florence, Italy. [URL]
Higgins, D., Ramineni, C., & Zechner, K. (2015). Learner corpora and automatic scoring. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 587–604). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, W. M., & Liou, H. C. (2008). A case study of corpus-informed online academic writing for EFL graduate students. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 28–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2010). Linking L2 proficiency to L2 acquisition: Opportunities and challenges of profiling research. In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: intersections between SLA and language testing research. (Eurosla monographs series; No. 1). European Second Language Association (pp. 233–238). [URL]
Jordan, G. (2015). Geoff Jordan vs. Duolingo. ELT Jam. [URL]
Klimova, M. A., Smilga, V. K., & Overnikova, D. A. (2021). Using an error-annotated learner corpus (REALEC) in DDL lessons. Proceedings of the International Conference Corpus Linguistics 2021 (pp. 112–121), St. Petersburg. [URL]
Kyle, K. (2021a). Introduction: Natural language processing for Learner Corpus Research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 7(1), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2021b). Special issue on Natural Language Processing for Learner Corpus Research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 7(1). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. W. (2003). Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor. In M. D. Shermis, & J. Burnstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A Cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 87–112). Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leacock, C., Chodrow, M., & Tetrault, J. (2015). Automatic grammar- and spell-checking for language learners. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 567–586). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1997). Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery, & G. Knowles (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp. 1–23). Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2015). The English Vocabulary Profile as a benchmark for assigning levels to learner corpus data. In M. Callies, & S. Götz (Eds.) Learner corpora in Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 115–140). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llorente, R., Morant, M., & Garrigos-Simon, F. J. (2012). Crowdlearning, applying social collaboration in higher education. Proceedings of new perspectives in science education. [URL]
Lo, Y.-C., Chen, J.-J., Yang, C.-Y., & Chang, J. S. (2018). Cool English: A grammatical error correction system based on large learner corpora. In System Demonstrations: Proceedings from the 27th international conference on computational linguistics (pp.82–85). Santa Fe [URL]
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Sixth edition (2014). Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, G. R. (1999). Adjective intensification – Learners versus native speakers: A corpus study of argumentative writing. Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luo, Q., & Zhou, J. (2017). Data-driven learning in second language writing class: A survey of empirical studies. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3), 182–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lusta, A., Demirel, O., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2023). Language corpus and data driven learning (DDL) in language classrooms: A systematic review. Heliyon, 91, e22731. [URL].
Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Second edition. (2007). Macmillan Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, T., & Akutsu, S. (2015). First steps in assigning proficiency to texts in a learner corpus of computer-mediated communication. In M. Callies, & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner corpora in Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 85–112). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez-Garcia, M. T., & Wulff, S. (2012). Not wrong, yet not quit right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 225–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. (2014). Putting the CEFR to good use: Designing grammars based on learner-corpus evidence. Language Teaching, 49(1), 99–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A., Murcia-Biels, S., & Rollinson, P. (2010). Focus on errors: Learner corpora and pedagogical tools. In M. Campoy-Cubillo, B. Bellés-Fortuño, & L. Gea-Valor (Eds), Corpus-based approaches to English Language Teaching (pp. 180–194). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meurers, D. (2015). Learner corpora and natural language processing. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 537–566). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, N., & Lehtinen, B. (2008). DIY local learner corpora: Bridging gaps between theory and practice, The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 61–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2006). Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 123–137). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitton, R., & Okada, T. (2007). The adaptation of an English spellchecker for Japanese writers. Symposium for Second Language Writing. Nagoya, Japan. [URL]
Moon, S., & Oh, S. (2018). Unlearning overgenerated be through data-driven learning in the secondary EFL classroom. ReCALL, 30(1), 48–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J., & Götz, S. (2015). Learner corpora and learning context. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds), Cambridge handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 423–442). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Negishi, M., Takada, T., & Tono, Y. (2013). A progress report on the development of the CEFR-J. In E. D. Galaczi, & C. J. Weir (Eds.), Exploring language frameworks (pp. 137–165). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2004). Learner corpora and their potential in language teaching. In J. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 125–52). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholls, D. (2003). The Cambridge Learner Corpus: Error coding and analysis for lexicography and ELT. In D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 conference (pp. 572–581). UCRE Technical Paper 16. Lancaster University, [URL]
Novikov, A., & Vinokurova, V. (2022). Learner corpus as a medium for tasks. In S. V. Nuss, & M. W. Whitehead (Eds.), Task-based instruction for teaching Russian as a foreign language (pp. 47–64). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Dell, F. (2005). How the Cambridge Learner Corpus helps with materials writing. Humanising Language Teaching, 7(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orenha-Ottaiano, A. (2012). English collocations extracted from a corpus of university learners and its contribution to a language teaching pedagogy. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture Maringá, 34(2), 241–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, E. B. (2003). Project essay grade: PEG. In M. D. Shermis, & J. Burnstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 43–54). Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palacios-Martínez, I., & Martínez-Insua, A. (2006). Connecting linguistic description and language teaching: Native and learner use of existential there. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 213–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Cañado, M. L., & Díez Bedmar, M. B. (2006). Data-driven learning and awareness-raising: An effective tandem to improve grammar in written composition? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 1(3) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P. (2003). Integrating networked learner oral corpora into foreign language instruction. In S. Granger, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Extending the scope of corpus-based research: New applications, new challenges (pp. 249–261). Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rankin, T., & Schiftner, B. (2011). Marginal prepositions in learner English: Applying local corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 412–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimrott, A., & Heift, T. (2008). Evaluating automatic detection of misspellings in German. Language Learning and Technology, 12(3), 73–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rozovskaya, A., & Roth, D. (2010). Training paradigms for correcting errors in grammar and usage in human language technologies. The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 154–162). Los Angeles: The Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudner, L. M., Garcia, V., & Welch, C. (2006). An evaluation of IntelliMetricSM essay scoring system. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(4). [URL]
Salamoura, A. (2008). Aligning English Profile research data to the CEFR. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, 331, 5–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samoudi, N., & Modirkhamene, S. (2022). Concordancing in writing pedagogy and CAF measures of writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(3), 699–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 131, 206–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Strasser, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning and teaching. Anglistik, 331, 165–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2002). Pedagogy and local learner corpora: Working with learning-driven data. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 213–234). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S., Dang, A., & Wang, H. (2023). Learner corpora in corpus-informed instruction: Moving toward an asset- and genre-based model. TESOL Quarterly, early view. [URL]
Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 103–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tetrault, J., Chodrow, M., & Madnani, N. (2014). Bucking the trend: Improved evaluation and annotation practices for ESL error detection systems. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48(1), 5–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thewissen, J. (2012). Accuracy across proficiency levels: Insights from an error-tagged EFL learner corpus [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université catholique de Louvain.
(2013). Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error-tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 77–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todd, R. W. (2001). Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System, 29(1), 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribble, C., & Jones, G. (1997[1990]). Concordances in the classroom. Athelstand Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umezawa, J., Mizuno, J., Okazaki, N., & Inui, K. (2013). Evidence in automatic error correction improves learners’ English skill. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. CICLing 2013. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 78171. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Usami, H. (2013). Using a learner corpus to improve distractors in multiple choice grammar questions. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, moving ahead. Proceedings of the first learner corpus research conference (LCR 2011) (pp. 455–462). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Ahn, L. (2013). Duolingo: learn a language for free while helping to translate the web. In J. Kim, J. Nichols, & P. Szekely (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 1–2). NCA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, S. (2010). What features of spoken and written corpora can be exploited in creating language teaching materials and syllabuses? In A. O’Keeffe, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 333–344). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-B., & Lee, L.-S. (2012). Improved approaches of modelling and detecting error patterns with empirical analysis for computer-aided pronunciation training. In Proceedings of 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 5049–5052), Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wanner, L., Ramos, M. A., Vincze, L., Nazar, R., Ferraro, G., Mosqueira, E., & Prieto, S. (2013). Annotation of collocations in a learner corpus for building a learning environment. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead (pp. 493–503). Presses universitaires de Louavain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wisniewski, K. (2017). The empirical validity of the Common European Framework of Reference scales. An exemplary study for the vocabulary and fluency scales in a language testing context. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 933–959. [URL]
Yannakoudakis, H., Briscoe, D., & Medlock, B. (2011). A new dataset and method for automatically grading ESOL texts. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 180–189), Portland, Oregon. [URL]
Yoon, H., & Jo, J. W. (2014). Direct and indirect access to corpora: An exploratory case study comparing students’ error correction and learning strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 96–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaki, M. (2021). Self-correction through corpus-based tasks: Improving writing skills of Arabic learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zechner, K., Higgins, D., Xi, X., & Williamson, D. M. (2009). Automatic scoring of non-native spontaneous speech in tests of spoken English. Speech Communication, 51(10), 883–895. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2025. Techniques for Beginner-Level Data-Driven Learning. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Computer-Assisted Language Learning, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Flowerdew, Lynne
2025. Corpora and Language Teaching. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Götz, Sandra
2025. Learner Corpora in Data-Driven Learning. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Computer-Assisted Language Learning, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lücke, Stephan, Patricia de Crignis, Johanna Wolf & Florian Zacherl
2025. The MuLeCo project: A learner corpus of L1 German learners of Romance languages. Ampersand 15 ► pp. 100225 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Fei & Amanda Patten
2025. Epistemic lexical verbs in academic writing: A corpus-based comparative study of L1 English and L1 Chinese writers of English. Applied Corpus Linguistics 5:3 ► pp. 100144 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Shanshan
2025. A computational framework for environmental corpus construction in business English interpretation based on deep learning. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering DOI logo
Yeh, Aiden
2025. Transforming postgraduate discourse studies through AI-enhanced Corpus-Based Language Pedagogy. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2024. Review of Viana, Vander ed. 2023. Teaching English with Corpora: A Resource Book. London: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-032-25297-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/b22833. Research in Corpus Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Granger, Sylviane
2024. From early to future learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue