Cover not available

Review published In: International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 8:2 (2022) ► pp.289295

References (14)
References
Alsop, S., & Nesi, H. (2009). Issues in the development of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus. Corpora, 4(1), 71–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaisch, T., Gries, S. Th., & Mukherjee, J. (2014). The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide: A Journal of Varieties of English, 35(1), 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Linguistics in search of its evidential base (Studies in Generative Grammar) (pp. 75–96). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, M., & Zaytseva, E. (2013). The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE) – A new resource for the study and assessment of advanced language proficiency. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead (Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 1) (pp. 49–59). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2017). Cognition, Corpora, and Computing: Triangulating Research in Usage-Based Language Learning. Language Learning, 67(S1), 40–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2015). Learner language. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 418–436). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. Th. (2009). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grafmiller, J. (2014). Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language & Linguistics, 18(3), 471–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grafmiller, J., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2018). Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change, 30(3), 385–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäschke, K., & Plag, I. (2016). The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 485–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, M., Grafmiller, J., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2019). Particle placement alternation in EFL learner vs. L1 speech: assessing the similarity of probabilistic grammars. In A. Abel, A. Glaznieks, V. Lyding, & L. Nicolas (Eds.), Widening the Scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected Papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference (pp. 71–92). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2011). From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6(2), 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Gries, S. Th., & Lester, N. (2018). Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp. 99–120). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Lester, N., & Martinez-Garcia, M. T. (2014). That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English. Language and Cognition, 6(02), 271–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue