Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (1999) ► pp.137–171
Corpus Linguistics and Cognitivism
Published online: 13 August 1999
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.1.07sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.1.07sch
The following article is meant to discuss the status of corpus linguistics, how it is seen and sees itself as a field: Is it merely a method of doing linguistics, or can it be considered a distinct approach to language description? In our argument, we claim that corpus linguistics is on the way of becoming more than a methodology, since its research results are increasingly interpreted with regard to their impact on the commonly held views about language. Dealing with these interpretations, we have noticed a number of similarities with assumptions made by cognitive linguistics, and we aim at showing that the two trends—corpus linguistics and cognitivism—are compatible in that they complement each other.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Proroković, Jakov & Frane Malenica
Culpeper, Jonathan & Michael Haugh
2021. The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Goldfarb, Neal
Wulff, Stefanie
Hampe, Beate
Gries, Stefan Th.
Shinzato, Rumiko & Kyoko Masuda
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
SARDINHA, Tony Berber
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
