Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 29:4 (2024) ► pp.472–506

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Case and agreement variation in contact

A multifactorial investigation of it-clefts across World Englishes

ORCiD logo with link | Zhejiang University
ORCiD logo with link | Zhejiang University
Published online: 25 April 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22119.zha
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of language contact on morphosyntactic variation in World Englishes, specifically focusing on the joint variation of case and agreement in it-clefts with pronominal clefted constituents. Employing a multifactorial approach within the framework of probabilistic grammar, we examine the distribution of the four relevant it-cleft variants in the GloWbE corpus. We find that language contact, as a language-external factor, impacts the strengths and rankings of language-internal factors but not their directions. Additionally, we observe an intricate interplay between language contact and language-internal factors in shaping morphosyntactic patterns: low-contact varieties tend to display feature-based case and agreement with a high degree of variability, while high-contact varieties tend to exhibit position-based case and agreement with a low degree of variability. These findings shed light on the mechanisms underlying the development of language diversity and structural simplification in World Englishes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contact-induced case and agreement variation
    • 2.1Morphosyntactic variation in World Englishes
    • 2.2Case and agreement variation in it-clefts
      • 2.2.1Case marking of pronominal clefted constituents
      • 2.2.2Agreement variation in it-clefts
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Contact as a language-external factor
    • 3.2Language-internal factors of it-clefts
    • 3.3Statistics
  • 4.Case and agreement variation in it-clefts
    • 4.1Joint distribution of case and agreement variation in it-clefts
      • 4.1.1Variant distribution across pronominal clefted constituents
      • 4.1.2Variant distribution across contact levels
    • 4.2Case variation
    • 4.3Agreement variation
  • 5.Probabilistic grammar of it-clefts in contact
    • 5.1Probabilistic distribution and Type II variation
    • 5.2Probabilistic constraints
    • 5.3Syntactic configuration in contact
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
References (50)
References
Akmajian, A. (1970). On deriving cleft sentences from pseudo-cleft sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 1(2), 149–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, B. J. (2008). History of the research on case. In A. L. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of case (pp. 13–26). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots (pp. 75–96). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Hay, J. (2008). Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua, 118(2), 245–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2013). Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE). Retrieved June 14, 2021, from [URL]
Deshors, S. C., & Götz, S. (2020). Common ground across globalised English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(1), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
É Kiss, K. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74(2), 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erdmann, P. (1978). It’s I, it’s me: A case for syntax. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 101, 67–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, M. H., Uffing, E., Van Vaeck, N., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2021). Variation isn’t that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0252602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grafmiller, J., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2018). Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change, 30(3), 385–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2011). Studying syntactic priming in corpora: Implications of different levels of granularity. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence: Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research (pp. 143–164). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1981). It’s I, it’s me: Further reflections. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 131, 17–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedberg, N. A. (1990). Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English (Publication No. 303859145) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations.
Hickey, R. (2005). Englishes in Asia and Africa: Origin and structure. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Legacies of colonial English: Studies in transported dialects (pp. 503–535). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 1–28). Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (1995). Does English really have case? Journal of Linguistics, 31(2), 375–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janitza, S., Strobl, C., & Boulesteix, A.-L. (2013). An AUC-based permutation variable importance measure for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 141, 119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1927). A modern English grammar on historical principles, Part III. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1937). Analytic syntax. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H. (1996). Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(5), 699–702. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, B., & Schneider, A. (2011). Grammaticalisation in non-standard varieties of English. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 263–278). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, B., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2004). Global synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in English. In B. Kortmann & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English (pp. 1142–1202). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krämer, M., & Wunderlich, D. (1999). Transitivity alternations in Yucatec, and the correlation between aspect and argument roles. Linguistics, 37(3), 431–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45(4), 715–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maier, G. (2014). The case of focus. In K. Davidse, C. Gentens, L. Ghesquière, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns (pp. 173–205). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGinnis, M. (2007). Phi-feature competition in morphology and syntax. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Bejar (Eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces (pp. 155–184). Oxford University Press. [URL]
Mesthrie, R. (2010). Contact and African Englishes. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 518–537). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., Rehner, K., & Nadasdi, T. (2004). The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(3), 408–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J. (2005). Agreement features, agreement and antiagreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23(3), 655–686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., Varlokosta, S., Spyropoulos, V., Kaili, H., Prokou, S., & Revithiadou, A. (2011). Case morphology and word order in second language Turkish: Evidence from Greek learners. Second Language Research, 27(2), 173–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2012). The English it-cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (2001). African American English in the diaspora. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 4.3.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Requena, P. E., & Berry, G. M. (2021). Cross-linguistic influence in L1 processing of morphosyntactic variation: Evidence from L2 learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(1), 153–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. (1976). The morphosyntax of the Central Ojibwa verb (Publication No. 7627576) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations.
Schmidtke, D., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Mass counts in World Englishes: A corpus linguistic study of noun countability in non-native varieties of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 13(1), 135–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schreier, D., Hundt, M., & Schneider, E. W. (2020). World Englishes: An introduction. In D. Schreier, M. Hundt, & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of World Englishes (pp. 1–22). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, M. J., & Aijón Oliva, M. Á. (2011). Syntactic variation and communicative style. Language Sciences, 33(1), 138–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(2), 318–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B., & Röthlisberger, M. (2016). Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide, 37(2), 109–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24(2), 135–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2010). Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp. 299–319). Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales, K. (1996). Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue