Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 29:2 (2024) ► pp.155–188

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The inverse frequency effect

An exploratory study

ORCiD logo with link | University of Rochester
Published online: 9 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22080.tem
Abstract
Rare syntactic constructions show an especially strong tendency to be repeated, but some rare constructions exhibit this tendency much more strongly than others. The reasons for this variation are not well understood. This exploratory study examines five rare noun-phrase (NP) expansions in English: <the A> (the rich), <a Nprop Nprop> (a Bob Gates), <Nsing Nprop Nprop> (architect Julia Morgan), <D Npl Nsing> (the jobs data), and <Nsing A Nsing> (home electronic equipment). Repetition tendencies are very strong in the first and second of these and somewhat strong in the third; in the fourth and fifth they are much weaker, only slightly higher than those of common NP expansions such as <D A Nsing> (the black dog). To explain this variation, we suggest that constructions may be associated with different types of discourse: constructions with high repetition tendencies tend to occur in persuasive rather than informative discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous work on syntactic repetition
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Choice and definition of syntactic constructions
    • 3.2Measuring close repetition and parallelism
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Explaining the results
    • 5.2Limitations
  • 6.Conclusions and future directions
  • Note
  • References
References (41)
References
Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F. (1980). Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 221–239). Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charniak, E., Blaheta, D., Ge, N., Hall, K., Hale, J., & Johnson, M. (2000). Bllip 1987–89 WSJ corpus release 1. Linguistic Data Consortium, 361.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 214–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, E. (1971). Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student (2nd Edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubey, A., Keller, F., & Sturt, P. (2008). A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism. Cognition, 109(3), 326–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenk, A., & Fenk, G. (1980). Konstanz im Kurzzeitgedächtnis – Konstanz im sprachlichen Informationsfluß? Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 27(3), 400–414.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 379–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). A mechanistic framework for explaining audience design in language production. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 29–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, A., & Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 939–944). [URL]
Frazier, L., Munn, A., & Clifton, C. (2000). Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(4), 343–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery, A. (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora (pp. 102–121). Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(4), 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In In R. Levy & R. Reitter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol 21., pp. 159–166). Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(1), 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heycock, C., & Zamparelli, R. (2003). Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(3), 443–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2008). Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language, 84(1), 8–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the primes prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konopka, A. E., & Bock, K. (2009). Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58(1), 68–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2007). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, & T. Hofmann (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference (pp. 849–856). MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcus, M. P., Kim, G., Marcinkiewicz, M. A., MacIntyre, R., Bies, A., Ferguson, M., Katz, K., & Schasberger, B. (1994). The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. In ARPA Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology (pp. 114–119). Morgan Kaufmann. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A. (2017). The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics, 631, 47–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myslín, M., & Levy, R. (2016). Comprehension priming as rational expectation for repetition: Evidence from syntactic processing. Cognition, 1471, 29–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2006). Computational Modelling of Structural Priming in Dialogue. In R. C. Moore, J. Bilmes, J. Chu-Carroll, & M. Sanderson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 121–124). Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL].
(2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, T. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context, Discourse Processes, 24(1), 119–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89(3), 179–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2005). Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 113–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Temperley, D. (2022). Music and language. Annual Review of Linguistics, 81, 153–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Temperley, D., & Gildea, D. (2015). Information density and syntactic repetition. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1802–1823. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing (pp. 155–179). Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1994). Repetition and emphasis in rhetoric: Theory and practice. In A. Fischer (Ed.), Repetition (Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature, 7) (pp. 85–114). Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue