Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 29:1 (2024) ► pp.87–115

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Keywords of the manosphere

ORCiD logo with link | Birmingham City University
ORCiD logo with link | Lancaster University
Published online: 14 August 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22053.mcg
Abstract
This paper examines language used in five of the largest manosphere communities on Reddit (r/TheRedPill, r/braincels, r/MensRights, r/seduction, and r/MGTOW) to identify idiosyncratic language use within these communities. To do so, a novel methodology which combines key-key-word analysis with notions from set theory was used to identify and compare keywords between corpora and to find keywords that are used uniquely within – and thus are distinctive to – these five separate communities. The paper achieves the following: it (i) presents a novel method for identifying what we term ‘complement keywords’ (keywords that are not shared between multiple different corpora when compared against the same reference corpus), and (ii) explores idiosyncratic language use in five separate manosphere communities. The analysis first examines interdiscursive relationships between communities emerging from the complement keywords identified before discussing community-specific preoccupations emergent in the idiosyncratic language use found in these five communities.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Keyword methods for corpus-driven studies of discourse
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Interdiscursive relationships between manosphere communities
    • 4.2Community specific discourses
      • 4.2.1r/braincels
      • 4.2.2r/MensRights
      • 4.2.3r/MGTOW
      • 4.2.4r/seduction
      • 4.2.5r/TheRedPill
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Ädel, A. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of political discourse. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 591–604). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2004a). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). ‘Unnatural acts’: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 88–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Keywords: Signposts to objectivity? In A. Čermáková & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), The Corpus Linguistics Discourse (pp. 77–94). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., & McGlashan, M. (2020). Critical Discourse Analysis. In S. Adolphs & D. Knight (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of English Language and the Digital Humanities (pp. 220–241). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benatar, D. (2012). The Second Sexism: Discrimination Against Men and Boys. Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boe, B. (2023). PRAW: The Python Reddit API Wrapper [Computer software]. [URL]
Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2019). In other words: ‘The language of attraction’ used by pick-up artists. English Today, 35(2), 13–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). The Language of Pick-Up Artists: Online Discourses of the Seduction Industry. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denes, A. (2011). Biology as consent: Problematising the scientific approach to seducing women’s bodies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(5), 411–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2019). Incorporating text dispersion into keyword analyses. Corpora, 14(1), 77–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., Larsson, T., & Biber, D. (2020). Doing Linguistics with a Corpus: Methodological Considerations for the Everyday User. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iveson, M., & Formato, F. (2019, May 30). “Be a man – grow a beard”: Investigation into public responses to the Gillette advert on YouTube and Reddit [Paper presentation]. British Association of Applied Linguistics (BAAL) Special Interest Group on Language, Gender and Sexuality, Birmingham, UK.
Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse (pp. 225–258). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotell, L., & Dutton, E. (2016). Sexual violence in the ‘manosphere’: Antifeminist men’s rights discourses on rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, C., Trott, V., & Wright, S. (2020). Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment, New Media and Society, 22(10), 1903–1921. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krendel, A. (2020). The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society, 31(6), 607–630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). From sexism to misogyny. In I. Zempi & J. Smith (Eds.), Misogyny as Hate Crime (pp. 99–118). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krendel, A., McGlashan, M., & Koller, V. (2022). The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, R., & Baker, P. (2015). The hate that dare not speak its name? Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 57–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. (2008). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddit. (2016). Reddit API terms of use. Retrieved August 23, 2021, from [URL]
Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikable subjects. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 251–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitz, R., & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5(2), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2016). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice – a guide. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed., pp. 137–153). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, S. (2021). Digesting the red pill: Masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, D. (2020). The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media, 361, 100402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuckerberg, D. (2018). Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Barber, Kate
2025. Legal cynicism in Men’s Rights discourses: Using corpus linguistics to investigate how distrust in the legal system excuses and perpetuates sexual violence against women. Applied Corpus Linguistics 5:3 ► pp. 100148 ff. DOI logo
Brookes, Gavin
2025. Language and Online Misogyny. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Campé, Sid
2025. “I’m not going back to the Plantation”. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 9:2 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Iñigo, Anna
2025. Navigating the Manosphere: A Scoping Review of Research on Masculinist and Misogynist Online Spaces. The Journal of Men’s Studies DOI logo
McGlashan, Mark, Isobelle Clarke, Matt Gee, Tatiana Grieshofer, Andrew Kehoe & Robert Lawson
2025. COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories, discourses of liberty, and “the new normal” on social media. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo
Tomsett, Ellie
2025. Exposing Russell Brand: navigating allegations of sexual misconduct and appealing to the manosphere. Celebrity Studies 16:4 ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
张, 宏文瑞
2025. A Review of Empirical Studies on Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. Modern Linguistics 13:07 ► pp. 806 ff. DOI logo
Nicholas, Lucy, Sal Clark, Christine Agius & Kay Cook
2024. Antifeminist, manosphere and right-wing extremist sentiment among men who use domestic and family violence: masculinism, misinformation, and the justificatory logics of violence. NORMA ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Koller, Veronika, Alexandra Krendel & Jessica Aiston
2023. The Language of Gender-Based Separatism, DOI logo
McGlashan, Mark
2023. (Mental) Health in the Manosphere. In Masculinities and Discourses of Men's Health [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue