Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2017) ► pp.85–106

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Stance and voice in academic writing

The “noun + that” construction and disciplinary variation

 | Jilin University
Published online: 28 July 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.1.04jia
Abstract
Stance and voice are two crucial elements of social interactions in academic writing. However, their conceptual constructs are elusive and their linguistic realisation is not fully explored. A relatively overlooked feature is the “noun + that” structure, where a stance head noun takes a nominal complement clause (as advantage that in Flow cytometry offers the advantage that long term is available). This construction allows a writer to express authorial stance towards complement content and attribute a voice to that stance through pre-modification. This paper examines this construction in a corpus of 60 journal articles across six disciplines extracted from the BNC corpus. Developing an expressive classification of stance nouns and the possible voice categorisation, this study shows that the structure is not only widely used to project stance and voice, but that it displays considerable variation in the way that it is used to build knowledge across different disciplines.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Stance and voice in academic writing
  • 3.“Noun + that” construction
  • 4.Corpus, categorisation and analysis
  • 5.Stance expressions through choice of head nouns
  • 6.Voice projection through averal, attribution or concealment
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V. (2008). Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 3–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press Madison.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgess, A., & Ivanič, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Orwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the noun “that” pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 203–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. Tesol Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (1996). Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 475–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T. (2006). Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Use of signalling nouns across L1 and L2 writer corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 36–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G. (1986). Anaphoric Nouns. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guinda, C. S., & Hyland, K. (2012). Introduction: A context-sensitive approach to stance and voice. In K. Hyland & C. Guinda, Sancho (Eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993a). The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp. 137–146). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993b). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin’s The Origin of the Species . In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power (pp. 95–116). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techiniques in Vocabulary & Grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (2013). The struggle with voice in scientific writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(12), 1580–1580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 176–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Guinda, C. S. (2012). Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivanič, R. (1991). Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open-and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 93–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1), 3–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, K. F., & Hyland, K. (2015). ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 529–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MAXQDAplus. (2012) (Version 11) [Computer software]. Berlin: VERBI GmbH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, H., & Moreton, E. (2012). EFL/ESL writers and the use of shell nouns. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 126–145). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2013). Representing own and other voices in social science research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(2), 199–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrić, B. (2010). Students’ conceptions of voice in academic writing. In R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas & E. Lafuente-Millán (Eds.), Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres (pp. 324–336). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prelli, L. J. (1989). A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H. -J. (2000). English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1986). Fictional worlds. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about Text (pp. 43–60). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tadros, A. (1993). The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, Description, Discourse (pp. 98–114). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardy, C. M., & Matsuda, P. K. (2009). The construction of author voice by editorial board members. Written Communication, 26(1), 32–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, E. O. (1982). Towards a Contextual Grammar of English: The Clause and its Place in the Definition of Sentence. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (36)

Cited by 36 other publications

Abdeljaoued, Marii
2026. From hedging to self-mention: Seventy years of stance in doctoral theses and what it means for EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 79 ► pp. 101616 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Ling & Jinlei Deng
2025. “This dissertation intricately explores…”: ChatGPT's shell noun use in rephrasing dissertation abstracts. System 129 ► pp. 103578 ff. DOI logo
Hunston, Susan
2025. Corpus Linguistics, Stance and Evaluation. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Hang Su
2025. Exemplification and its local grammar patterns in English as an academic lingua franca in research writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 75 ► pp. 101504 ff. DOI logo
Kozacikova, Zuzana
2025. Metadiscursive clauses controlled by nouns and adjectives in linguistics research papers. Discourse and Interaction 18:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Ruegg, Rachael
2025. Assessment of written assignments in first-year humanities and social sciences courses: textual features of academic writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 32:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yunyun & Guangwei Hu
2025. Positive covariation or trade-off? A cross-disciplinary investigation of shell nouns and their congruent expressions in research articles. Scientometrics 130:7 ► pp. 3629 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Yinxia, Xiaorui Liang & Yingying Liu
2025. A study on the developmental features and stance construction of shell nouns by Chinese EFL learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Abbasi Montazeri, Ebtesam & Alireza Jalilifar
2024. Evaluative stance in academic arguments. English Text Construction 17:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Youneng, Jingjing Wang & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2024. Epistemic positioning by science students and experts: a divide by applied and pure disciplines. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 927 ff. DOI logo
Han, Hao & Natalia Mikhailovna Dugalich
2024. Self-mention in Chinese linguistic MA novices’ and experts’ academic writing: A corpus-driven investigation of ‘we’. Litera :4 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Guangsa, Chenle Li & Ya Sun
2024. Developing a genre-based research article reading module for undergraduate students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 72 ► pp. 101448 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Fan & Yiying Yang
2024. Diachronic changes in the phrasal complexity of research articles (1970–2020): a cross-disciplinary investigation. Scientometrics 129:7 ► pp. 4395 ff. DOI logo
Abbasi Montazeri, Ebtesam, Alireza Jalilifar & Jorge Arus Hita
2023. Evaluative language in applied linguistics research article discussions: exploring the functions and patterns of that-structures in argumentative texts. Language Awareness 32:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Deng, Liming & Ping He
2023. “We may conclude that:” a corpus-based study of stance-taking in conclusion sections of RAs across cultures and disciplines. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Liu, Xueying & Haoran Zhu
2023. Linguistic positivity in soft and hard disciplines: temporal dynamics, disciplinary variation, and the relationship with research impact. Scientometrics 128:5 ► pp. 3107 ff. DOI logo
Lorés, Rosa
2023. Dual voices, hybrid identities: the recontextualization of research in digital dissemination scientific discourse . Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Qi, Qi & Cecilia Guanfang Zhao
2023. Discoursal scholarly identity in research writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 62 ► pp. 101052 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Weiyu & Yin Ling Cheung
2023. The different ways to write publishable research articles: Using cluster analysis to uncover patterns of APPRAISAL in discussions across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 63 ► pp. 101231 ff. DOI logo
Cañada Pujols, Maria Dolors & Carme Bach
2022. Marcadores metadiscursivos interaccionales en resúmenes de TFG: ¿indicadores de dominio del género?. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2022. Metadiscourse choices in EAP: An intra-journal study of JEAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 60 ► pp. 101165 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken, Wenbin Wang & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2022. Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua 265 ► pp. 103205 ff. DOI logo
Kirmizi, Ozkan & Gulin Dagdeviren Kirmizi
2022. Nominal Stance in Cross-disciplinary Academic Writing of L1 and L2 Speakers in Noun + that Constructions. Journal of Language and Education 8:2 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Simanjuntak, Risa Rumentha
2022. Revealing the rhetorical moves and linguistic patterns in discipline-related undergraduate thesis. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature) 7:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Simanjuntak, Risa Rumentha
2025. Claiming Importance of Research: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis on Indonesian Students’ Research Papers. In Applied Linguistics in the Indonesian Context [Engaging Indonesia, ], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yimin & Hang Su
2022. “We define X as …”: A local grammar of definition in linguistics research articles and its pedagogical value. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 59 ► pp. 101143 ff. DOI logo
Alghazo, Sharif, Mohd Nour Al Salem & Imran Alrashdan
2021. Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System 103 ► pp. 102681 ff. DOI logo
Birhan, Amare Tesfie
2021. An exploration of metadiscourse usage in book review articles across three academic disciplines: a contrastive analysis of corpus-based research approach. Scientometrics 126:4 ► pp. 2885 ff. DOI logo
Curry, Niall & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
2021. Stance nouns in COVID-19 related blog posts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2021. ‘The goal of this analysis …’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua 252 ► pp. 103017 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2025. Metadiscursive nouns in academic argument: ChatGPT vs student practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 75 ► pp. 101514 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2021. Stance and engagement in 3MT presentations: How students communicate disciplinary knowledge to a wide audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51 ► pp. 100976 ff. DOI logo
Rørvik, Sylvi
2021. Cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic uses of tensed verb phrases in the methods sections of master’s theses. In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101], ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019. Register, Genre, and Style, DOI logo
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The collocation networks of stance phrases. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Simaki, Vasiliki, Carita Paradis & Andreas Kerren
2018. Evaluating stance-annotated sentences from the Brexit Blog Corpus: A quantitative linguistic analysis. ICAME Journal 42:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue