Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 29:1 (2024) ► pp.34–58
Concordancing for CADS
Practical challenges and theoretical implications
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the authors.
Published online: 27 July 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21168.gil
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21168.gil
Abstract
Concordance analysis is widely recognised as one of the main techniques in a corpus linguist’s toolkit. However,
despite a growing body of work critically exploring previously unquestioned mainstays of corpus methods (Mautner, G. (2015). Checks
and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods
of Critical Discourse Analysis, (3rd
ed., pp. 154–179). SAGE.; Taylor, C., & Marchi, A. (2018). Corpus
Approaches to Discourse. Routledge.), this has not
focused on concordance analysis specifically. In this paper, we aim to discuss issues that researchers may encounter when
interpreting concordances. We begin in Step One with a cursory examination of 800 concordance lines in order to identify potential
issues. In Step Two, we assess the distribution of those issues in a reduced sample of 200. As a result, we identify eight
interpretability issues: noise in the corpus, non-standard syntax, unclear referring expressions, unclear quotation source
attribution, technical terms/jargon, acronyms/initialisms, unspecific co-text, and lines unrelated to the research question. After
reflecting on practical challenges, we discuss the epistemological implications of removing concordance lines uncritically and
suggest ten recommendations for future work.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Analysing concordances
- 2.1The concordance line: A useful artefact
- 2.2Reflections on procedure
- 2.3Types of concordance analysis
- 3.Our research design
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Step One: Cursory examination of 800 concordance lines
- 4.2Step Two: Categorising interpretability issues
- 5.Epistemological implications
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (40)
Anthony, L. (2018). Visualisation
in corpus-based discourse studies. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus
Approaches to Discourse: A Critical
Review (pp. 197–224). Routledge.
(2022). AntConc (Version
4) [Computer software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Appleton, S. (2021). East,
West, and Westminster: A corpus-based study of UK foreign policy statements regarding the unification of Germany, October 1989
to November 1990. Journal of Corpora and Discourse
Studies, 41, 39–62.
Archer, D., & Gillings, M. (2020). Depictions
of deception: A corpus-based analysis of five Shakespearean characters. Language and
Literature, 29(3), 246–274.
(2018). Conclusion:
Reflecting on reflective research. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus
Approaches to Discourse: A Critical
Review (pp. 281–292). Routledge.
Balfour, J. (2019). ‘The
mythological marauding violent schizophrenic’: Using the word sketch tool to examine representations of schizophrenic people
as violent in the British press. Journal of Corpora and Discourse
Studies, 21, 40–64.
BNC Consortium. (2007). British National
Corpus (version 3, BNC XML ed.). [URL]
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical
discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of
Management
Studies, 47(6), 1213–1218.
Culpeper, J., & Gillings, M. (2018). Politeness
variation in England: A north-south divide? In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus
Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken
BNC2014 (pp. 33–59). Routledge.
Fanego, T., & Rodríguez-Puente, P. (2019). Corpus-Based
Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Benjamins.
Gillings, M., Mautner, G., & Baker, P. (2023). Corpus-Assisted
Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, R. (2020). Twitter
reactions to the UN’s #HeForShe campaign for gender equality: A corpus-based discourse
analysis. Journal of Corpora and Discourse
Studies, 31, 31–50.
Joulain, A. T. (2017). Corpus
Linguistics for History: The Methodology of Investigating Place-name Discourses in Digitised Nineteenth-century
Newspapers. [Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University research directory.
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The
Sketch Engine: Ten years
on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36.
Kopf, S. (2019). Content
policies in social media critical discourse studies: The invisible hand of social media
providers? Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across
Disciplines, 11(1), 1–19.
Larsson, T., Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2022). On
the status of statistical reporting versus linguistic description in corpus linguistics: A ten-year
perspective. Corpora, 17(1), 137–157.
Leitch, S., & Palmer, I. (2010). Analysing
texts in context: Current practices and new protocols for critical discourse analysis in organization
studies. Journal of Management
Studies, 47(6), 1194–1212.
Levon, E. (2016). Qualitative
analysis of stance. In P. Baker & J. Egbert (Eds.), Triangulating
Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic
Research (pp. 152–166). Routledge.
Lutzky, U. (2021). “You
keep saying you are sorry”. Exploring the use of sorry in customer communication on
Twitter. Discourse, Context &
Media, 39(3).
Marchi, A. (2018). Dividing
up the data: Epistemological, methodological and practical impact of diachronic
segmentation. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus
Approaches to Discourse: A Critical
Review (pp. 174–196). Routledge.
Marchi, A., & Taylor, C. (2018). Introduction:
Partiality and reflexivity. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus
Approaches to Discourse: A Critical
Review (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
Mautner, G. (2015). Checks
and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods
of Critical Discourse Analysis, (3rd
ed., pp. 154–179). SAGE.
(2022). What
can a corpus tell us about discourse? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, (2nd
ed., pp. 250–262). Routledge.
Mautner, G., & Learmonth, M. (2020). From
administrator to CEO: Exploring changing representations of hierarchy and prestige in a diachronic corpus of academic
management writing. Discourse &
Communication, 14(3), 273–293.
McEnery, T., Baker, H., & Dayrell, C. (2019). Working
at the interface of hydrology and corpus linguistics: Using corpora to identify unrecorded droughts in nineteenth-century
Britain. In J. Egbert & P. Baker (Eds.), Using
Corpus Methods to Triangulate Linguistic
Analysis (pp. 52–84). Routledge.
(2021). Analysing
the impacts of 19th-century drought: A corpus-based study. In M. Fuster-Márquez, C. Gregori-Signes, J. Santaemilia, & P. Rodríguez-Abruñeiras (Eds.), Exploring
Discourse and Ideology Through
Corpora (pp. 47–70). Peter Lang Publishing Group.
McEnery, T., & Brezina, V. (2022). Fundamental
Principles of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus
Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns
and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies
(CADS). John Benjamins.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation
in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality &
Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. (2018). Metaphor,
Cancer, and the End of Life: A Corpus-based
Study. Routledge.
Sinclair, J. (1999). A
way with common words. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out
of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig
Johnasson (pp. 157–179). Rodopi.
Weisser, M. (2016). Practical
Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction to Corpus-based Language
Analysis. Blackwell.
Zottola, A. (2018). Transgender
identity labels in the British press: A corpus-based discourse analysis. Journal of Language
and
Sexuality, 7(2), 237–262.
Cited by (23)
Cited by 23 other publications
Brown, Katy
Brown, Katy
Carradini, Stephen, Mathew Gillings & Sky Marsen
Culpeper, Jonathan, Isolde van Dorst & Mathew Gillings
Disdier, Johanna
Evans, Craig & Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
Gillings, Mathew & Sylvia Jaworska
Gillings, Mathew, Tobias Kohn & Gerlinde Mautner
Hofer-Bonfim, Bernadette & Franzisca Weder
Hollmann, Willem B. & Mathew Gillings
Kalwa, Nina
Prihantoro & Mathew Gillings
Sreejak, Thanawut
Zou, Jiantao & Xuri Tang
Blanco-Gómez, María Luisa & María-José Gómez-Ortiz
Chan, JJ & Mathew Gillings
Gillings, Mathew
2024. Politics, religion, and drama. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 44 ff.
Gillings, Mathew
Gillings, Mathew, Mark Learmonth & Gerlinde Mautner
Jaworska, Sylvia, Renata Stenka & Emre Parlakkaya
Kitis, E. Dimitris
Parnell, Tamsin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
