Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 29:1 (2024) ► pp.1–33

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Metaphorical polysemy of the Chinese color term hēi 黑 “black”

A corpus-based cognitive semantic analysis with Behavioral Profiles

ORCiD logo with link | City University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | City University of Hong Kong
Published online: 15 June 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21067.liu
Abstract
This paper reports a corpus-based, cognitive semantic study on profiling the varied uses of the Chinese color term hēi 黑 “black” with regard to its metaphorical polysemy. We hypothesize that the semantic (dis)similarities among the eight metaphorical meanings of hēi “black” can be captured by clustering their contextual features, including collocational patterns, morphosyntactic and semantic properties, and discourse information. The Behavioral Profiles approach is adopted for the analyses with the annotations of 800 instances for 46 contextual features and a hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis conducted on the annotated data. The results show that the eight metaphorical senses of hēi “black” fall into three clusters. This clustering can be explained by the conceptual bases pertaining to color perceptions and color changes, in line with Conceptual Metaphor Theory. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the corpus-based Behavioral Profiles approach in exploring the underlying cognitive mechanisms of metaphorical extensions and meaning differentiations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphorical polysemy and Behavioral Profiles
    • 2.1Metaphorical polysemy of CTs
    • 2.2Metaphorical polysemy of Chinese CT hēi “black”
    • 2.3Behavioral Profiles studies on polysemy
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Introduction to contextual features (ID tags)
    • 3.3Feature annotation
  • 4.Behavioral Profiles analysis
    • 4.1General observation on cluster solution
    • 4.2Behavioral Profiles: Cluster 1 vs. Clusters 2 & 3
      • 4.2.1Overview of distinctive contextual features
      • 4.2.2Cognitive semantic analysis based on the distinctive contextual features
    • 4.3Behavioral Profiles: Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 3
      • 4.3.1Overview of distinctive contextual features
      • 4.3.2Cognitive semantic analysis based on distinctive contextual features
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (56)
References
Aliakbari, M., & Khosravian, F. (2013). A corpus analysis of color-term conceptual metaphors in Persian proverbs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 701, 11–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Jarf, R. (2019). Translation students’ difficulties with English and Arabic color-based metaphorical expressions. Fachsprache, 41(S1), 101–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, K. (2009). The connotations of English color terms: Color-based X-phemisms. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 626–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altman, D. G. (1990). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amouzadeha, M., Tavangara, M., & Sorahia, M. (2011). A cognitive study of color terms in Persian and English. Proceeding of 4th International Conference of Cognitive Science (pp. 238–245). Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apresjan, J. (1974). Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 12(142), 5–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkins, B. T. S. (1987). Semantic ID tags: Corpus evidence for dictionary senses. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary (pp. 17–36). University of Waterloo. [URL]
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatti, S. (2016). Translating colour metaphors: A cognitive perspective. In M. Taibi (Ed.), New Insights into Arabic Translation and Interpreting (pp. 161–176). Channel View. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copestake, A., & Briscoe, T. (1995). Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics, 12(1), 15–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Divjak, D. (2003). On trying in Russian: A tentative network model for near(er)-synonyms. Slavica Gandensia, 301, 25–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Structuring the Lexicon: A Clustered Model for Near-synonymy. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Divjak, D., & Gries, S. Th. (2009). Corpus-based cognitive semantics: A contrastive study of phasal verbs in English and Russian. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Dziwirek (Eds.), Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics (pp. 273–296). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(1), 23–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. (1951). Modes of meaning. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Linguistics (pp. 1934–1951). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghafel, B., & Mirzaie, A. (2014). Colors in everyday metaphoric language of Persian speakers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1361, 133–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27(4), 857–874. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2006). Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many senses of to run. In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 57–99). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Ten Lectures on Quantitative Approaches in Cognitive Linguistics. Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Divjak, D. (2009). Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 57–75). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P. (1996). Contextual dependency and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 75–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional structure. Word, 10(2–3), 146–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hastürkoğlu, G. (2018). Incorporation of conceptual metaphor theory in translation pedagogy: A case study on translating simile-based idioms. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(4), 467–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, P. (2008). The metaphorical use of colour terms in the Slavonic languages. In D. N. Wells (Ed.), Themes and Variations in Slavic Languages and Cultures (pp. 62–83). Australia and New Zealand Slavists’ Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. (2016). hēi 黑 “black”. In The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (7th ed., p. 531). The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ioannou, G. (2020). Image schemas as prototypes in the diachronic evolution of kámnō and eutheiázō in Greek: A behavioural-profile analysis. Lingua, 2451, 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansegers, M., & Gries, S. Th. (2017). Towards a dynamic behavioral profile: A diachronic study of polysemous sentir in Spanish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(1), 145–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansegers, M., Vanderschueren, C., & Enghels, R. (2015). The polysemy of the Spanish verb sentir: A behavioral profile analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(3), 381–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (1996). Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language, 72(3), 533–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., & Tugwell, D. (2001). Word sketch: Extraction and display of significant collocations for lexicography. Information Technology Research Institute Technical Report Series. University of Brighton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klepousniotou, E. (2002). The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 205–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional Scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrica, 29(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lai, H. L., & Chung, S. F. (2018). Color polysemy: Black and white in Taiwanese language. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 16(1), 95–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levshina, N. (2011). Doe wat je niet laten kan: A Usage-based Analysis of Dutch Causative Constructions [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven]. University of Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Z. C., & Bai, H. R. (2013). Conceptual metaphors of black and white: A corpus-based comparative study between English and Chinese. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 22(4), 92–97.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liesenfeld, A., Liu, M. C., & Huang, C. R. (2022). Profiling the Chinese causative construction with rang (讓), shi (使) and ling (令) using frame semantic features. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 18(2), 263–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.1.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Suzuki, R., Terada, Y., & Shimodaira, H. (2019). pvclust: Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling (R package version 2.2-0) [Computer software]. [URL]
Wierzbicka, A. (1990). The meaning of color terms: Semantic, culture and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 99–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, J. S. (2011). The evolution of basic color terms in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 39(1), 76–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, T. P. (1986). 论颜色词及其模糊性质 [Analysis on color terms and their fuzzy nature]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 21, 88–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xing, Z. Q. (2008). Semantics and pragmatics of color terms in Chinese. In Z. Q. Xing (Ed.), Studies of Chinese Linguistics: Functional Approaches (pp. 87–102). Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Malt, B. C., & Srinivasan, M. (2017). Evolution of word meanings through metaphorical mapping: Systematicity over the past millennium. Cognitive Psychology, 961, 41–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, W. X. (1988). 色彩词语联想意义初论 [Analysis on the associative meanings of color terms]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 31, 112–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Chen, Chuanhong & Xu Wen
2025. What does water mean to us. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Dou, Jinmeng, Tianqi He & Tong Chen
2025. Embodied grounding of abstract concepts: an image-based comparative analysis of sensorimotor and emotional experiences in Chinese. Cognitive Processing DOI logo
Dou, Jinmeng & Wenting Xue
2025. Perceptual (dis)similarities between colors and emotions: An empirical investigation with the image-based visual corpus analysis approach. Acta Psychologica 259 ► pp. 105447 ff. DOI logo
Dou, Jinmeng & Zhuo Zhang
2025. An image-based investigation on color associations among 100 Chinese emotion words. Cognition and Emotion 39:4 ► pp. 928 ff. DOI logo
Fioravanti, Irene
2025. Connecting Corpus Linguistics and Psycholinguistics. In Exploration of the Intersection of Corpus Linguistics and Language Science, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Looi, Jarvis, Patricia Nora Riget, Alex Boulton & Roshidah Hassan
2025. From theory to data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics DOI logo
Song, Yiming & Deliang Wang
2025. BERT-assisted behavioral profiling of polysemy: contrastive analysis of HONG in Chinese and RED in English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue