Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 28:3 (2023) ► pp.291–317

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Things we smell and things they smell like

Communicatively relevant odours and odorants

ORCiD logo with link | Monash University
Published online: 25 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21028.pou
Abstract
The sense of smell has been relatively neglected in the Western research. It is not regarded as particularly useful compared to the perceived importance of senses like sight, sound, and touch. Correspondingly, English speakers are ill-equipped to describe qualities of smells, instead invoking entities that share similar olfactory qualities, e.g. like roses. This raises the question: which odours do English speakers frequently refer to, and which terms describe them? This corpus-driven study looks at nouns in olfactory contexts, and the conceptual domains they fall into. Results show that speakers invoke different smells according to context: when talking about a smell they perceive, when describing a smell, or in a description of another smell, which demonstrates the differential communicative functions of smells. Further analysis shows that smells that are described are more variable than those used as descriptors, and smells being used to describe are more emotional using psychometric norming data.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Descriptions of smells
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus
    • 3.2Word selection and data cleaning
    • 3.3Coding
    • 3.4Semantic tagging
    • 3.5Valence norms
    • 3.6Odorant variability norms
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Item frequency
    • 4.2Conceptual domains
    • 4.3Olfactory contexts
      • 4.3.1Valence
      • 4.3.2Odorant variability
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Stimulus
    • 5.2Descriptum
    • 5.3Descriptor
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (56)
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arshamian, A., Gerkin, R. C., Kruspe, N., Wnuk, E., Floyd, S., O’Meara, C., Rodriguez, G. G., Lundström, J. N., Mainland, J. D., & Majid, A. (2022). The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures. Current Biology, 32(9), 2061–2066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boisson, C. P. (1997). La dénomination des odeurs: Variations et régularités linguistiques [The naming of odours: Linguistic variations and regularities]. Intellectica, 24(1), 29–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chastrette, M. (2002). Classification and structure-odor relationships. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition (pp. 100–116). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chrea, C., Ferdenzi, C., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (2007). Revisiting the relation between language and cognition: A cross-cultural study with odors. Current Psychology Letters, 22(2), 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chrea, C., Valentin, D., Sulmont-Rossé, C., Ly Mai, H., Hoang Nguyen, D., & Abdi, H. (2004). Culture and odor categorization: Agreement between cultures depends upon the odors. Food Quality and Preference, 15(7–8), 669–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croijmans, I., & Majid, A. (2016). Not all flavor expertise is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1889). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. D. Appleton and Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990–2019. [URL]
Dubois, D. (2000). Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 11, 35–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engen, T. (1983). The human uses of olfaction. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 4(4), 250–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floyd, S., San Roque, L., & Majid, A. (2018). Smell is coded in grammar and frequent in discourse: Cha’palaa olfactory language in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 28(2), 175–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Jara-Ettinger, J., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., Ratnasingam, S., Gibson, M., Piantadosi, S. T., & Conway, B. R. (2017). Color naming across languages reflects color use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10785–10790. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hörberg, T., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2020). Mapping the semantic organization of the English odor vocabulary using natural language data. PsyArXiv. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howes, D. (1987). Olfaction and transition: An essay on the ritual uses of smell. Canadian Review of Sociology, 24(3), 398–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iatropoulos, G., Herman, P., Lansner, A., Karlgren, J., Larsson, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2018). The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors. Cognition, 1781, 37–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iravani, B., Schaefer, M., Wilson, D. A., Arshamian, A., & Lundström, J. N. (2021). The human olfactory bulb process odor valence representation and initiate motor avoidance behavior. bioRxiv. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaeppler, K., & Mueller, F. (2013). Odor classification: A review of factors influencing perception-based odor arrangements. Chemical Senses, 381, 189–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemp, C., Xu, Y., & Regier, T. (2018). Semantic typology and efficient communication. Annual Review of Linguistics, 41, 109–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2019). Perception and metaphor: The case of smell. In L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception Metaphors (pp. 327–346). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2010). A note on the asymmetry in the hedonic implicatures of olfactory and gustatory terms. In S. Fuchs, P. Hoole, C. Mooshammer, & M. Zygis (Eds.), Between the Regular and the Particular in Speech and Language (pp. 235–245). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, A. P. (2015). Lexical categories and conceptualization of olfaction in Amis. Language and Cognition, 7(3), 321–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind and Language, 29(4), 407–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A. (2021). Human olfaction at the intersection of language, culture, and biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(2), 111–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., De Valk, J., & Hansson, B. S. (2018). Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Kruspe, N. (2018). Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Current Biology, 28(3), 409–413.e2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Ozturk, O., … Levinson, S. C. (2018). Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A, 115(45), 11369–11376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGann, J. P. (2017). Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science, 356(6338), eaam7263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Meara, C., & Majid, A. (2016). How changing lifestyles impact seri smellscapes and smell language. Anthropological Linguistics, 58(2), 107–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 33–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plümacher, M. (2007). Color perception, color description and metaphor. In M. Plümacher & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of Colors and Odors (pp. 61–84). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulton, T. (2020a). Odours and Odorants (COCA) [Data set]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020b). The smells we know and love: Variation in codability and description strategy. Language and Cognition, 12(3), 501–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulton, T., & Hill, C. (forthcoming). Linguistic descriptions and cultural models of olfaction in Umpila and English. Language Sciences.
Rayson, P., Archer, D. E., Piao, S., & McEnery, T. (2004). The UCREL semantic analysis system. Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP tTasks in Association with LREC 2004. Lisbon (pp. 7–12). [URL]
Rouby, C., & Bensafi, M. (2002). Is there a hedonic dimension to odors? In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition (pp. 140–159). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S., & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Lee, S. W. S. (2019). The smell of suspicion: How the nose curbs gullibility. In J. P. Forgas & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Gullibility (pp. 234–252). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepherd, G. M. (2004). The human sense of smell: Are we better than we think? PLoS Biology, 2(5), e146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1975). Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J., & Soriano, C. (2008). Sensorial perception as a source domain: A cross-linguistic study [Paper presentation]. VII International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM 7), Cáceres, Spain.
Vanek, N., Sóskuthy, M., & Majid, A. (2021). Consistent verbal labels promote odor category learning. Cognition, 2061, 104485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & D. Östen (Eds.), Explanations for Language Universals. Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. A., & Stevenson, R. J. (2006). Learning to Smell: Olfactory Perception from Neurobiology to Behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2016). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A. (2018). Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, 1791, 213–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wnuk, E., & Majid, A. (2014). Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition, 131(1), 125–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010). An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 219–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaslavsky, N., Kemp, C., Tishby, N., & Regier, T. (2019). Color naming reflects both perceptual structure and communicative need. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 207–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Schönefeld, Doris Eveline
2025. Expressing smells in (American) English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21:3 ► pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Hörberg, Thomas, Murathan Kurfalı, Maria Larsson, Erika J. Laukka, Pawel Herman & Jonas K. Olofsson
2024. A Rose by Another Name? Odor Misnaming is Associated with Linguistic Properties. Cognitive Science 48:10 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue