Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2016) ► pp.465–498

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A corpus-based approach to transitivity analysis at grammatical and conceptual levels

A case study of South Korean newspaper discourse

 | Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Published online: 6 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.4.02lee
The paper aims to demonstrate the usefulness of a novel corpus-based approach to analyzing Halliday’s transitivity for application to critical discourse analysis (CDA). The approach expands transitivity analysis beyond the traditional profiling of participant roles and process types at grammatical level to conceptual subcategorization, in light of the fact that CDA researchers often end up delving into the meanings of individual processes as part of their transitivity analyses. The paper introduces a scheme for annotating transitivity both at grammatical and conceptual levels on the basis of Halliday & Matthiessen (2004) and applies it to a case study examining news reports from two ideologically opposed South Korean newspapers on a nationwide public movement against US beef imports. The analysis reveals that the two newspapers contrast with each other in representing the riot police and the demonstrators as Actor and Goal in material processes grammatically and in processes of violence conceptually.
References (83)
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (2009). The legitimation of violence. In J.F. Short, Jr & M.E. Wolfgang (Eds.), Collective Violence (pp. 100–111). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bang, M. (2003). A Corpus-based Study of Representation of Foreign Countries in the South Korean Press. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behnam, B., & Zenouz, R.M. (2008). A contrastive critical analysis of Iranian and British newspaper reports on the Iran nuclear power program. In N. Nørgaard (Ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use (pp. 199–218). Odense: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton, D. (1982). Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics (pp. 194–214). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffarel, A., Martin, J.R., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (Eds.) (2004). Language Typology, A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotterill, J. (2001). Domestic discord, rocky relationships: Semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O. J. Simpson trial. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 291–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. (1985). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995a). Critical Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995b). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). New labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 121–138). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 162–186). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friendly, M. (2013). Working with categorical data with R and the vcd and vcdextra packages. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2013).
Goatly, A. (2004). Corpus linguistics, systemic functional grammar and literary meaning: A critical analysis of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. Ilha do Desterro, 461, 115–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallardo, B.C. (2006). Analysis of a literary work using systemic-functional grammar. In L. Barbara & T.B. Sardinha (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress (pp. 735–762). São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed May 2012).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, D.E. (2007). The Body in Flannery O’Connor’s Fiction: Computational Technique and Linguistic Voice. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S.S. Chatman (Ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium (pp. 330–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hubbard, E.H. (1999). Love, war and lexicogrammar: Transitivity and characterization in The Moor’s Last Sigh. In I. Biermann & A. Combrink (Eds.), Poetics, Linguistics, History: Discourses of War and Conflict, Proceedings of The Poetics and Linguistics Association Conference (pp. 314–327). Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Im, Y.J. (2009). A comparative analysis of news frame on U.S. Beef Imports and candlelight vigils. Hankuk Enlol Chengpo Hakpo, 461, 109–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming and framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamila, H. (2009). The ‘cartoons controversy’: A critical discourse analysis of English-language Arab newspaper discourse. Discourse & Society, 20(1), 33–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janks, H. (2002). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. In M.J. Toolan (Ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Concepts in Linguistics (pp. 26–42). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ji, Y., & Shen, D. (2004). Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook . Language and Literature, 13(4), 335–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (1982). Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature (pp. 82–99). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller V. (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurtz, L. (2008). Preface. In L. Kurts (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict (2nd ed.) (pp. xix–xxv). Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machin, D., & Thornborrow, J. (2006). Lifestyle and the depoliticisation of agency: Sex as power in women’s magazines. Social Semiotics, 16(1), 173–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manan, S. (2001). Re-reading the media: A stylistic analysis of Malaysian media coverage of Anwar and the Reformasi Movement. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 11(4), 34–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. (1999). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Huston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp. 142–175). Oxford: OUR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse, Meaning beyond the Clause. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R., & White, P.P.P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez, M.A. (2002). From ‘‘Under the Rose’’ to V: A linguistic approach to human agency in Pynchon’s fiction. Poetics Today, 23(4), 633–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matheson, D. (2005). Media Discourses: Analyzing Media Texts. Birkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2007). Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly . Language in Society, 36(1), 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Analysing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 30–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009a). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 122–143). London & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009b). Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp. 32–46). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. (1993). Language, character and action: A linguistic approach to the analysis of character in a Hemingway short story. In J.M. Sinclair, M. Hoey & G. Fox (Eds.), Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse (pp. 127–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nørgaard, N. (2003). Systemic Functional Linguistics and Literary Analysis: A Hallidayan Approach to Joyce, a Joycean Approach to Halliday. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M. (2007). UAM CorpusTool (Version 2.8.17) [Computer software]. Available from [URL] (last accessed November 2016).
O’Halloran, K.A. (2007a). The subconscious in James Joyce’s ‘Eveline’: A corpus stylistic analysis that chews on the ‘Fish hook’. Language and Literature, 16(3), 227–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007b). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R.E. (2003). ‘Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum’: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair Ruth. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 559–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from [URL] (last accessed September 2016).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryder, M.E. (1999). Smoke and mirrors: Event patterns in the discourse structure of a romance novel. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(8), 1067–1080. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharrock, W.W., & Anderson, D.C. (1981). Language, thought and reality again. Sociology, 15(2), 287–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. (2011, December 11). How elite media strategies marginalize the Occupy Movement. Common Dreams. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed February 2013)
Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving Models of Language (pp. 100–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teruya, K. (2006). Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teich, E. (2009). Linguistic computing. In M.A.K. Halliday & J.J. Webster (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.113–127). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thetela, P. (2001). Critique discourses and ideology in newspaper reports: A discourse analysis of the South African press reports on the 1998 SADC’s military intervention in Lesotho. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 347–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). From process to pattern: Methodological considerations in analyzing transitivity in text. In C. Jones & E. Ventola (Eds.), Language to Multimodality: New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning (pp. 17–34). London: Equinox publishing Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wareing, S. (1994). And then he kissed her: The reclamation of female characters in submissive roles in contemporary fiction. In K. Wales (Ed.), Feminist Linguistics in Literary Criticism (pp. 117–136). Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodok, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodok & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodok & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–33). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. (1995a). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4(3), 157–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995b). Review of Fairclough discourse and social change. Applied Linguistics, 16(4), 510–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996). Reply to Fairclough: Discourse and interpretation: Conjectures and refutations. Language and Literature, 5(1), 57–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, L., & Harrison, C. (Eds.) (2004). Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Cheng, Gong & Hai Xu
2025.  Reinforcing or challenging stereotypes? Uncovering Africa’s image in the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary . Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2024. Quantifying transitivity: Uncovering relations of gender and power. Language Variation and Change 36:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Course, Simla, Fatma Şeyma Koç & Fatma Özlem Saka
2024. Representation of older adults in Turkish newspaper reports during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Aging Studies 69 ► pp. 101232 ff. DOI logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2023. Transitivity and evaluation in American and Spanish parliamentary discourse: the 2015 State of the Union Address in the US vs. the 2015 State of the Nation Address in Spain. Critical Discourse Studies 20:2 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Seungpeel, Jina Kim, Dongjae Kim, Ki Joon Kim & Eunil Park
2023. Computational approaches to developing the implicit media bias dataset: Assessing political orientations of nonpolitical news articles. Applied Mathematics and Computation 458 ► pp. 128219 ff. DOI logo
Sofyaningrat, Siti Sarah, Untung Yuwono & Totok Suhardijanto
2023. A Corpus-Based Approach to Transitivity Analysis of Ulamas in Media. In Proceedings of the fourth Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Arts and Humanities Stream (AHS-APRISH 2019) [Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 753], ► pp. 430 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Guofeng, Xiuzhen Wu & Qiao Li
2022. A bibliometric study of news discourse analysis (1988‒2020). Discourse & Communication 16:1 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
2021. Quantifying Systemic Coupling and Syndrome Using Multivariate Statistical Methods. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Anafo, Comfort & Richmond S. Ngula
2020. On the grammar of scam: transitivity, manipulation and deception in scam emails. <i>WORD</i> 66:1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Alonso Belmonte, Isabel
2019. Chapter 13. Victims, heroes and villains in newsbites. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Nartey, Mark & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2019. Towards a decade of synergising corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: a meta-analysis. Corpora 14:2 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Gregoriou, Christiana & Ilse A. Ras
2018. ‘Call for Purge on the People Traffickers’: An Investigation into British Newspapers’ Representation of Transnational Human Trafficking, 2000–2016. In Representations of Transnational Human Trafficking, ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue