Article published In: Language and Covid-19
Edited by Michaela Mahlberg and Gavin Brookes
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:4] 2021
► pp. 444–468
The Covid infodemic
Competition and the hyping of virus research
Published online: 25 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20160.hyl
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20160.hyl
Abstract
Covid-19, the greatest global health crisis for a century, brought a new immediacy and urgency to international bio-medical research. The pandemic generated intense competition to produce a vaccine and contain the virus, creating what the World Health Organization referred to as an ‘infodemic’ of published output. In this frantic atmosphere, researchers were keen to get their research noticed. In this paper, we explore whether this enthusiasm influenced the rhetorical presentation of research and encouraged scientists to “sell” their studies. Examining a corpus of the most highly cited SCI articles on the virus published in the first seven months of 2020, we explore authors’ use of hyperbolic and promotional language to boost aspects of their research. Our results show a significant increase in hype to stress certainty, contribution, novelty and potential, especially regarding research methods, outcomes and primacy. Our study sheds light on scientific persuasion at a time of intense social anxiety.
Keywords: Covid research, hype, academic persuasion, scientific writing
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: The infodemic
- 2.The hyping of medical research
- 3.Corpus and analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1How much hyping is there?
- 4.2What are the most common hyping devices?
- 4.3What aspects of research are most hyped?
- 4.4Has hyping behaviour changed during the pandemic?
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
References
References (42)
Allen-Mills, T., & Gregory, A. (2020, July 26). Bit by bit, British scientists are building an anti-Covid arsenal. Sunday Times. [URL]
Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brainard, J. (2020). Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat? Science [URL]
Chang, Y-Y. (2006, June 22–23). How do well-established scholars cite themselves over their academic careers? Six stories of six well-established scholars [Paper presentation]. Conference in Honour of John Swales, Ann Arbor, USA.
Daston, L. (2020). Ground zero empiricism. Critical Inquiry. [URL]
Dinis-Oliveira, R. J. (2020). COVID-19 research: Pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”. Forensic Sciences Research, 5(2), 174–187.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168.
Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J., Pálfy, M., & Coates, J. (2020). Preprinting a pandemic: The role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic. BioRxiv.
Fraser, V., & Martin, J. (2009). Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article? Respiratory Research, 10, 35.
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2013). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327.
Gilbert, G. N., & M. Mulkay. (1984). Opening Pandora’s box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Heimstadt, M. (2020). Between fast science and fake news: Preprint servers are political. LSE Impact Blog. [URL]
Horbach, S. (2020). Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19. bioRxiv 2020.04.18.045963;
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In Candlin, C. & Hyland, K. (Eds.), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices (pp. 99–121). Longman.
(2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 251–259.
(2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–191.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2019). Academic Discourse and Global Publishing: Disciplinary Persuasion in Changing Times. Routledge.
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report 5th ed. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, Holland.
Johnston, J. E., Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (2006). Measures of effect size for chi-squared and likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103(2), 412–414.
Lindeberg, A.-C. (2004). Promotion and Politeness: Conflicting Scholarly Rhetoric in Three Disciplines. Åbo Akademi University Press.
London, A. J., & Kimmelman, J. (2020). Against pandemic research exceptionalism. Science, 368(6490), 476–477.
LSE Public Policy Group. (2011). Maximizing the Impacts of your Research: A Handbook for Social Scientists (Consultation draft 3). LSE Public Policy Group. [URL]
McCarthy, M. (2015). Superlatives are commonly used in news coverage of cancer drugs, study finds. British Medical Journal, 3511, h5803.
Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F., & Budgell, B. (2019). “It is important to reinforce the importance of .”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 541, 139–151.
Nature Index. (2020). COVID-19 research update: How many pandemic papers have been published? Nature Index. [URL]
Pichappan, P., & Sarasvady, S. (2002). The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations. Scientometrics, 54(2), 285–290.
Rayson, P. (2016). Log-likelihood spreadsheet. [URL]
Redden, E. (2020). Rush to publish risks undermining COVID-19 Research. Inside Higher Ed. June 8, 2020. [URL]
Samraj, B. (2016). Research articles. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 403–415). Routledge.
Shehzad, W. (2010). Announcement of the principal findings and value addition in computer science research papers. Iberica, 191, 97–119.
Swales, J. M., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 2(4), 175–192.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Tsigaris, P. & Erfanmanesh, M. (2020). Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19. Scientometrics (2020).
Tingley, K. (2020). Coronavirus is forcing medical research to speed up. New York Times Magazine. April 21, 2020. [URL]
UNESCO. (2017). Science Report: Towards 2030. [URL]
Vinkers, C. H., Tijdink, J. K., & Otte, W. M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: Retrospective analysis. British Medical Journal, 3511, h6467.
Wang, W., & Yang, C. (2015). Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 201, 162–175.
Wellcome Trust. (2020). Publishers make coronavirus (COVID-19) content freely available and reusable. Wellcome Trust. [URL]
Cited by (29)
Cited by 29 other publications
Dong, Shuai, Jihua Dong & Buckingham Louisa
Ishak, Cita Nuary, Yazid Basthomi, Nurenzia Yannuar & Amelia Abdullah
Li, Zhijun, Jingyi Lin & Jinfen Xu
Liu, Zhiming, Jiawei Tu, Tien‐Tsung Lee & Lu Wei
Oxman, Andrew D., Annlaug Selstø, Arnfinn Helleve, Atle Fretheim, Cathinka Halle Julin, Christine Holst, Christopher James Rose, Heather Munthe-Kaas, Ingeborg Hess Elgersma, Jenny Moberg, Mona Bjørbæk, Petter Elstrøm, Runar Barstad Solberg, Sarah E. Rosenbaum, Signe Flottorp, Tone Bruun & Unni Gopinathan
Shamsi-Gooshki, Ehsan, Alireza Parsapoor & Soolmaz Moosavi
Wang, Ying
Wang, Ying
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Yale Fan
Hyland, Ken & Feng Jiang
Ishak, Cita Nuary, Yazid Basthomi & Nurenzia Yannuar
Jaworska, Sylvia, Michael K. Goodman & Iwona Gibas
Rossiter, Timothy & Averil Coxhead
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2024. “People should get their booster”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 447 ff.
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
Bondi, Marina & Jessica Jane Nocella
Corneille, Olivier, Jo Havemann, Emma L Henderson, Hans IJzerman, Ian Hussey, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Lee Jussim, Nicholas P Holmes, Artur Pilacinski, Brice Beffara, Harriet Carroll, Nicholas Otieno Outa, Peter Lush & Leon D Lotter
Dong, Jihua, Shuai Dong & Louisa Buckingham
2023. A discourse dynamics exploration of terminology for Covid-19 in professional and public discourse. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29:2 ► pp. 224 ff.
Hyland, Ken
Yao, Mingxin, Ying Wei & Huiyu Wang
Baker, Hannah, Shauna Concannon, Matthias Meller, Katie Cohen, Alice Millington, Samuel Ward & Emily So
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Xuyan Qiu
Jiang, Feng Kevin & Ken Hyland
Oxman, Andrew D., Atle Fretheim, Simon Lewin, Signe Flottorp, Claire Glenton, Arnfinn Helleve, Didrik Frimann Vestrheim, Bjørn Gunnar Iversen & Sarah E. Rosenbaum
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
