Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 20:4 (2015) ► pp.526–552

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Subjective definitions of spirituality and religion

An exploratory study in Germany and the US

 | Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
 | University of Bielefeld
 | University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Published online: 21 January 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.4.05alt
This paper shows how corpus methods can be usefully employed in the field of psychology of religion in triangulation with other empirical instruments. Current international surveys mirror an on-going transformation in subjective meanings in religious discourse cumulating in the question: what do people actually mean when they describe themselves as spiritual, religious or neither? The paper presents results of a cross-cultural study with 1,886 participants in the US and Germany. The thematic goal is to explore subjective understandings by examining personal definitions of religion and spirituality. Methodologically, the study shows how the key word procedure can be used to compare the semantic profile of subjective concepts between different languages and cultures by contrasting them to standard language and by using socio-biographical context variables to build contrasting sub-corpora. To control the in-equivalence of existing reference corpora in terms of size and design a so-called reference control corpus (RCC) is introduced.
References (47)
Altmeyer, S. (2011). Fremdsprache Religion? Sprachempirische Studien im Kontext religiöser Bildung. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Exploring the unknown: The language use of German RE-students writing texts about God. British Journal of Religious Education, 37(1), 20–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ammerman, N.T. (2013). Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2), 258–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013.) Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “muslim” in the British press 1998-2009. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, E. (2007). Preface. In B.A. Kosmin & A. Keysar (Eds.), Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives Institute for the Study of Secularism in the Society and Culture (ISSSC) (pp. iii–iv). Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2013).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Foundation (Ed.). (2009). What the World Believes: Analysis and Commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008. Gütersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, M., & Scott, M. (Eds.). (2010). Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dengler, R. (1974). A general inquirer analysis of sixteenth century and contemporary catechisms. Computers and the Humanities, 8(1), 5–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuller, R.C. (2001). Spiritual, but not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. Th. (2009). Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenwald, D.F., & Harder, D.W. (2003). The dimensions of spirituality. Psychological Reports, 92(3), 975–980. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). Reason and the Rationalization of Society: The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 11 (Thomas MacCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1987). Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason: The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 21 (Thomas MacCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harvey, K. (2013). Investigating Adolescent Health Communication: A Corpus Linguistics Approach. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heelas, P., Woodhead, L., Seel, B., Szerszynski, B., & Trusting, K. (2005). The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, R.W. (2003). Spirituality and religion. In A.L. Greil, & D.G. Bromley (Eds.), Religion: Critical Approaches to Drawing Boundaries between Sacred and Secular (pp. 241–264). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2007). The spiritual turn and the decline of tradition: The spread of post-Christian spirituality in 14 Western countries, 1981-2000. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(3), 305–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, B., Klein, C., Swhajor-Biesemann, A., Silver, C.F., Hood, R.W., & Streib, H. (2013). The semantics of ‘spirituality’ and related self-identifications: A comparative study in Germany and the U.S.A. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 35(1), 71–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, B., Streib, H., Silver, C.F., Klein, C., & Hood, R.W. (in preparation). Design, methods, and sample characteristics of the Bielefeld-based cross-cultural study of “spirituality”. In H. Streib & R.W. Hood (Eds.), Semantics and Psychology of “Spirituality”: A Cross-cultural Analysis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaCour, P., Ausker, N.H., & Hvidt, N.C. (2012). Six understandings of the word “spirituality” in a secular country. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34(1), 63–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development . In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis (pp. 191–218). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Corpus linguistics and discourse analysis. In K.P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of Discourse: Handbooks of Pragmatics: Vol 31 (pp. 215–238). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, M., & Bestgen, Y. (2009). Distinctive words in academic writing: A comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction. In A. Jucker, D. Schreier & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse (pp. 247–269). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2010). Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., & Niederhoffer, K.G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 541, 547–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlehofer, M.M., Omoto, A.M., & Adelman, J.R. (2008). How do “religion” and “spirituality” differ? Lay definitions among older adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(3), 411–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2015). WordSmith Tools Version 6. Liverpool, UK: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smart, N. (1998). Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streib, H., & Hood, R.W. (2011). “Spirituality” as privatized experience-oriented religion: Empirical and conceptual perspectives. Implicit Religion, 14(4), 433–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streib, H. (2008). More spiritual than religious: Changes in the religious field require new approaches. In H. Streib, A. Dinter & K. Söderblom (Eds.), Lived Religion: Conceptual, Empirical and Practical-Theological Approaches (pp. 53–67). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streib, H., Hood, R.W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Silver, C. (2009). Deconversion. Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States of America. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y.R., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teubert, W. (2007). Natural and human rights, work and property in the discourse of Catholic social doctrine. In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis (pp. 89–126). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teubert, W., & Čermáková, A. (2004). Directions in corpus linguistics. In M.A.K. Halliday, C. Yallop, W. Teubert & A. Cermakova (Eds.), Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (pp. 113–165). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wynne, M. (2008). Searching and concordancing. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An international Handbook, Vol. 11 (pp. 706–737). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinnbauer, B.J., Pargament, K.I., Cole, B., Rye, M.S., Butter, E.M., Belavich, T.G., Hipp, K.M., Scott, A.B., & Kadar, J.L. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Hahn, Jennifer Lois
2025. Religion and Spirituality in Addiction Recovery. Religion Compass 19:3 DOI logo
Bekar, Fevziye & M. Ferhat Özbek
2023. Managing Differences and Importance Between Religion, Spirituality, Spirituality at Work, Cyber Spirituality, and Dataism. In Spirituality Management in the Workplace, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Taves, Ann, Elliott Ihm, Melissa Wolf, Michael Barlev, Michael Kinsella, Maharshi Vyas & Luca Valera
2023. The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India. PLOS ONE 18:7 ► pp. e0287780 ff. DOI logo
Altmeyer, Stefan & Daniel Dreesmann
2021. “The tree was there first” – using an everyday ecological dilemma to explore the personal orientations of secondary school students in environmental decision-making. Environmental Education Research 27:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Streib, Heinz, Constantin Klein, Barbara Keller & Ralph Hood
2021. The Mysticism Scale as a Measure for Subjective Spirituality: New Results with Hood’s M-Scale and the Development of a Short Form. In Assessing Spirituality in a Diverse World, ► pp. 467 ff. DOI logo
Huber, Stefan, Mathias Tanner & Herbert Scheiblich
2020. Die dunkle Seite der Macht. cultura & psyché 1:1-2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Chan, Christian D. & Philip F. Daniels
2019. Deconstructing and Reconstructing Queer Spirituality in the South. In Queering Spirituality and Community in the Deep South, ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Demmrich, Sarah & Stefan Huber
2019. Multidimensionality of Spirituality: A Qualitative Study among Secular Individuals. Religions 10:11 ► pp. 613 ff. DOI logo
Dente, Claire L.
2018. Religion and Spirituality. In Social Work Practice with LGBTQIA Populations, ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Fraedrich, John, Othman Althawadi & Ramin Bagherzadeh
2018. A comparative analysis of the UN declaration, global business compact, and religious morals in determining global values for business and their application to Islamic marketing. Journal of Islamic Marketing 9:4 ► pp. 913 ff. DOI logo
Schrauf, Robert W.
2018. Mixed Methods Designs for Making Cross-Cultural Comparisons. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 12:4 ► pp. 477 ff. DOI logo
Altmeyer, Stefan & Constantin Klein
2016. “Spirituality” and “Religion”—Corpus Analysis of Subjective Definitions in the Questionnaire. In Semantics and Psychology of Spirituality, ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Mahlberg, Michaela, Peter Stockwell, Johan de Joode, Catherine Smith & Matthew Brook O'Donnell
2016. CLiC Dickens: novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora 11:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue