Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (2015) ► pp.1–29
Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing
Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data
Published online: 30 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb
This study uses Multi-Dimensional analysis to describe linguistic variation in a corpus of published academic writing across three publication types in two disciplines. The resulting five dimensions were labeled: “Affective synthesis versus specialized information density”, “Definition and evaluation of new concepts”, “Author-centered stance”, “Reader-friendly narrative”, and “Abstract observation and description”. Factorial ANOVAs were used to test for significant interactions between publication type and discipline on each of the five linguistic dimensions. Statistical interactions were discovered for four of the five dimensions. The appropriate tests for statistical differences, either for main effects or simple effects, were performed, and publication type and discipline patterns were interpreted for all five dimensions. This paper highlights the importance of accounting for all of the independent factors in a corpus, using factorial ANOVAs where appropriate, in order to appropriately analyze and interpret patterns of linguistic variability.
References (31)
Atkinson, D., & Biber, D. (1994). Register: A review of empirical research. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 351-385). Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
. (2006a). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.
. (2006b). University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
. (2012). Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 9-37.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
Biber, D., Egbert, J., Gray, B., Oppliger, R., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (in press). Variation versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In M. Kytö & P. Pahta (Eds.), Handbook of English historical linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2-20.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2014). Do more complex tasks facilitate greater grammatical complexity? An investigation of task type variation on the TOEFL iBT. Applied Linguistics, 1–31.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London, UK: Pearson Education.
Carkin, S. (2001). Pedagogic discourse in introductory classes: Multi-dimensional analysis of textbooks and lectures in biology and macroeconomics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Cloite, M., & Shinn, T. (1985). Expository practice: Social, cognitive and epistemological linkages. In T. Shinn & R. Whitley (Eds.), Expository Sience (pp. 31–60). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Conrad, S. (1996a). Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in biology and history. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
. (1996b). Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology. Linguistics and Education, 8(3), 299-326.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (Eds.). (2001). Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies. London, UK: Longman.
Csomay, E. (2007). A corpus-based look at linguistic variation in classroom interaction: Teacher talk versus student talk in American university classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 336-355.
Davies, Mark. (2008-). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available at [URL]
Davies, M. & Gardner, D. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339-59.
Egbert, J. (2014). Reader perceptions of linguistic variation in published academic writing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Grabe, W. (1984). Towards defining expository prose within a theory of text construction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Gray, B. (2011). Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Gries, S. Th. (2006). Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations. Corpora, 1(2), 109-151.
Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi, (Eds.), Academic Discourse across Disciplines (pp. 17-45). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
Kuehl, R.O. (2000). Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
R Development Core Team (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Reference Index (Version 2.2.1). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Revelle, W. (2012). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, WY: Northwestern University. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Demir, Nur Yağmur & Jesse Egbert
Hu, Changwei, Yu Zhu & Liangjie Yuan
Smirnova, Elizaveta
Smirnova, Elizaveta A. & Javier Pérez‐Guerra
Wang, Yixin & Jingyang Jiang
Becker, Kimberly
2023. A multi-dimensional analysis of graduate student writing in two applied science disciplines. Register Studies 5:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Egbert, Jesse & Marianna Gracheva
Hu, Yiyang & Qingshun He
McGrath, Darby & Cassi Liardét
Wang, Jiawei & Zhiying Xin
Liu, Jing & Liang Xiao
Shi, Jianzhong & Ming Xu
Biber, Douglas, Randi Reppen, Shelley Staples & Jesse Egbert
2020. Exploring the longitudinal development of grammatical complexity in the disciplinary writing of L2-English university
students. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Egbert, Jesse & Michaela Mahlberg
Egbert, Jesse & Luke Plonsky
Goulart, Larissa, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, Amanda Black, Aisha Shelton, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Stacey Wizner
Gray, Bethany, Elena Cotos & Jordan Smith
2020. Combining rhetorical move analysis with multi-dimensional
analysis. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 137 ff.
Wright, Heidi R.
2020. Stand-alone literature reviews. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 307 ff.
Conrad, Susan
2019. Register in English for Academic Purposes and English for Specific Purposes. Register Studies 1:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Egbert, Jesse & Douglas Biber
Sun, Yuxiu & Le Cheng
Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Bethany Gray
Parodi, Giovanni
2015. Variation across university genres in seven disciplines. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.