Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:3 (2014) ► pp.301–332

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Frequency effects and second language lexical acquisition

Word types, word tokens, and word production

 | Georgia State University
 | Arizona State University
Published online: 1 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.3.01cro
Frequency effects in an L1 and L2 longitudinal corpus were investigated using Zipfian distribution analyses and linear curve estimations. The results demonstrated that the NS lexical input exhibited Zipfian distributions, but that the L2 lexical output did not match the NS Zipfian patterns. Word frequency analyses indicated that NS interlocutors modify their lexicon such that frequency scores decrease as a function of time that L2 learners have studied English. In contrast, the word frequency scores for the L2 output increased as a function of time. Post-hoc analyses indicated that differences in frequency scores between NS input and L2 output were best explained by the repetition of infrequent words, but not frequent words by L2 learners in the early stages of language acquisition. The results question absolute frequency interpretations of lexical acquisition for L2 learners and provide evidence for usage-based approaches for language learning.
References (44)
Adjemian, C. 1983. “The transferability of lexical properties”. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Llearning. Rowley, MA: Newberry House, 250-268.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. “The relationship of form and meaning: A cross sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13 (3), 253-278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, H. 2003. Using Frequency Lists to Assess L2 texts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, J.K. & Goldberg, A.E. 2009. “Input effects within a constructionist framework”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 418-429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The British National Corpus. 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available at: [URL] (accessed October 2013).
Cobb, T. 2002. Web VocabProfiler. Available at: [URL] (accessed October 2013).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1992. “A power primer”. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S.A., Salsbury, T. & McNamara, D.S. 2010. “The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers”. Language Learning, 60 (3), 573-605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S.A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D.S. & Jarvis, S. 2011. “What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data”. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 182-193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S.A., Salsbury, T. & McNamara, D.S. 2012. “Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices”. Language Testing, 29 (2), 240-260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2002a. “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2) 143-188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002b. “Reflections on frequency effects in language acquisition: A response to commentaries”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 297-339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. “Language acquisition as rational contingency learning”. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1-24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. 2012. “What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use?” In S.T. Gries & D.S. Divjak (Eds.), Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing (Vol. 11).Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 7-34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Collins, L. 2009. “Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the Special Issue”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 329-335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009. “Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution and function”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 370-385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaies, S.J. 1983. “The investigation of language classroom processes”. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 205-217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. & Mackey, A. 2002. “Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture?” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 249-260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (2003). “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language”. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7 (5), 219-224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J.M. & DeKeyser, R. 2001. “Explaining the 'natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition' in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants”. Language Learning, 51 (1), 1–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, J., Dale, P., Li, P. 2008. “Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary”. Journal of Child Language, 351, 515-531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M. & Cai, Z. 2004. “Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language”. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36 (2), 193-202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S.T. 2008. “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13 (4), 403-437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations”. In S.T. Gries, S. Wulff & M. Davies (Eds.), Corpus Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 197-212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatch, E. 1983. Psycholinguistics: A Second Language Perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M. & Fearnow, S. 1999. “Testing the output hypothesis”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (3), 421-452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. 2000. “Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition”. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2), 239-278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. 2000. “Task effect on instructed vocabulary learning: The hypothesis of involvement”. Selected papers from AILA ’99 Tokyo. Tokyo: Waseda University Press, 47-62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. 1995. “Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production”. Applied Linguistics, 16 (3), 307–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1997. “Second language acquisition and the Completion Model”. In A.M.B. de Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 113-142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K. & Kim, Y. 2009. “Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of Wh-questions”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 386-398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mintz, T.H., Newport, E.L. & Bever, T.G. 2002. “The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children”. Cognitive Science, 26 (4), 393-424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T. 1983. “Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (1), 69–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. & Ellis, N.C. 2008. A Handbook of Cognitive Llinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shockey, L. 2003. Sound Patterns of Spoken English. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singleton, D. 1999. Vocabulary Learning in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1985. “Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development”. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235-253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “Three functions of output in second language learning”. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toth, P.D. 2006. “Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition”. Language Learning, 56 (2), 319-385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K. & LeBlanc, C. 2009. “The acquisition of tense– aspect: Converging evidence from corpora, cognition, and learner constructions”. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 354–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, G.K. (1935). The Psycho-biology of Language. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Chee, Allen Jie Ein, Csaba Zoltan Szabo & Sharimila Ambrose
2025. Measuring Emotion Recognition Through Language: The Development and Validation of an English Productive Emotion Vocabulary Size Test. Languages 10:9 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Haeuser, Katja I. & Jutta Kray
2025. Not so SUBTLE(X): word frequency estimates and their fit to sentential reading times in interaction with predictability. Linguistics DOI logo
Harvey, Robin E. & Patricia J. Brooks
2025. Effects of text messaging using digital Pinyin input on literacy skills of elementary school Chinese immersion learners. Language Teaching Research 29:4 ► pp. 1753 ff. DOI logo
Rankin, Tom & Thomas Wagner
2025. Effects of input frequency and microvariation on knowledge of negative inversion in L2 English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15:5 ► pp. 718 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Tao, Qian Chen, Zhiwei Zhang, Bingyu Dong, Hui Zhang, Jie Bai & Yun Zhou
2025. Maximizing effectiveness of AI-generated instructors through human-like behavior and dynamic visual cues in instructional videos: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. The Internet and Higher Education 67 ► pp. 101034 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Li
2025. Mitigating ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ predicaments: a practical framework for vocabulary development in the EFL curriculum. The Language Learning Journal ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Jianwei, Qidi Li & Jingyang Jiang
2024. The development of phrase‐frames in EFL learners’ essays: Variability, structures, and functions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 1689 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Eunseok Ro
2023. Additive extensive reading and syntactic development in second language writing: Analyses of syntactic complexity and sophistication in young EFL learners’ book reports. Journal of Second Language Writing 61 ► pp. 101040 ff. DOI logo
HALL, JOAN KELLY
2022. L2 Classroom Input and L2 Positionally Sensitive Grammars: The Role of Information‐Seeking Question Sequences. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Joan Kelly
2022. L2 classroom interaction and its links to L2 learners’ developing L2 linguistic repertoires: A research agenda. Language Teaching 55:1 ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Marjoleine Sloos & Weiyun Wei
2022. The role of word frequency in the L2 acquisition of variable patterns. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Lindstromberg, Seth & June Eyckmans
2020. The effect of frequency on learners’ ability to recall the forms of deliberately learned L2 multiword expressions. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Monteiro, Kátia R, Crossley, Scott A & Kyle, Kristopher
2020. In Search of New Benchmarks: Using L2 Lexical Frequency and Contextual Diversity Indices to Assess Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Berger, Cynthia M, Scott A Crossley & Kristopher Kyle
2019. Using Native-Speaker Psycholinguistic Norms to Predict Lexical Proficiency and Development in Second-Language Production. Applied Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Crossley, Scott A. & Stephen Skalicky
2019. Examining lexical development in second language learners: An approximate replication of Salsbury, Crossley & McNamara (2011). Language Teaching 52:3 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Crossley, Scott A., Stephen Skalicky, Kristopher Kyle & Katia Monteiro
2019. ABSOLUTE FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:04 ► pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
Goss, Seth J & Katsuo Tamaoka
2019. Lexical accent perception in highly-proficient L2 Japanese learners: The roles of language-specific experience and domain-general resources. Second Language Research 35:3 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Hashimoto, Brett J. & Jesse Egbert
2019. More Than Frequency? Exploring Predictors of Word Difficulty for Second Language Learners. Language Learning 69:4 ► pp. 839 ff. DOI logo
CROSSLEY, SCOTT, KRISTOPHER KYLE & THOMAS SALSBURY
2016. A Usage‐Based Investigation of L2 Lexical Acquisition: The Role of Input and Output. The Modern Language Journal 100:3 ► pp. 702 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue