Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2014) ► pp.225–251

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The acquisition of formulaic language by EFL learners

A cross-sectional and cross-linguistic perspective

Published online: 9 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.04len
Most of the studies on the use of phraseology by second language learners concentrate on advanced L2 users. Researchers attempt to tease out to what extent learners’ phraseology is different from the native one. There are almost no accounts of formulaic language emerging at the early stages of learning, particularly in foreign language settings. The research reported in this paper attempts to bridge this gap. It is exploratory in nature and investigates the emergence and use of lexical bundles by a range of students learning English in the classroom setting. The data analyzed in the study were drawn from the ICCI corpus and are examined with reference to learners’ ages, stages of proficiency, and L1 backgrounds. The probed essays were written by students in grades 6, 9 and 12 with Chinese, German, Hebrew, Japanese, Polish and Spanish as their L1s.
References (35)
Altenberg, B. 1998. “On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations.” In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications . ­Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amosova, N. N. 1963. Osnovi Angliyskoy Frazeologii . Leningrad: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Barbieri, F. 2007. “Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers”. English for Specific Purposes , 261, 263–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlsen, C. 2012. “Proficiency level: A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora”. Applied Linguistics , 33 (2), 161–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y. H. & Baker, P. 2010. “Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing”. Language Learning & Technology , 14 (2), 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N. 2008. “Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?”. Applied Linguistics , 29 (1), 72–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P. 1998. “Phraseological dictionaries: Some East-West comparisons”. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Application . Oxford: Claredon Press, 209–228.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2011. N-grams Data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) . Available at: [URL] (accessed February 2013).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. “Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing”. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory . Amsterdam: Rodopi, 51–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. & McEnery, T. 1998. “An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer . London: Longman, 67–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, M. B. 2012. “The use of the common European framework of reference for languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admission examination”. Revista de Educación , 3571, 55–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, O. J. 1961. “Multiple comparisons among means”. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 561, 52–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 2002a. “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 241, 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002b. “Reflections on frequency effects in language processing”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 241, 297–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C. 2008. “Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics and TESOL”. TESOL Quarterly , 41 (3), 375–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, B. & Warren, B. 2000. “The idiom principle and the open choice principle”. Text , 201, 29–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. 1998. “Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae.” In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications . Oxford: Oxford ­University Press, 145–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. & Paquot, M. 2008. “Disentangling the phraseological web”. In S. Granger & F. ­Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective . Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins, 27–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, N. & Nekrasova, T. M. 2007. “The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers”. The Modern Language Journal , 911, 433–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A. 2008. “Formulaic sequences in apprentice writing: Does more mean better?”. In A. Frankenberg-García (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Teaching and Language Corpora . Lisbon: ISLA-Lisboa, 207–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nekrasova, T. 2009. “English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles”. Language Learning , 59 (3), 647–686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. 2003. “The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching”. Applied Linguistics , 241, 223–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. 1983. “Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency”. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication . London: Longman, 191–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pendar, N. & Chapelle, C. 2008. “Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological Issues”. CALICO Journal , 25 (2), 189–206.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Grandage, S. & Adolphs, S. 2004. “Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid?”. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Lancker-Sidtis, D. & Rallon, G. 2004. “Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: Methods for classification and verification”. Language & Communication , 241, 207–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vidakovic, I & Barker, F. 2010. “Use of words and multi-word units in Skills for Life Writing examinations”. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes , 411, 7–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V. 1947. “Ob osnovnuikh tipakh frazeologicheskikh edinits v russkom yazuike”. In A. A. Shakhmatov (Ed.), 1864–1920. Sbornik Statey i Materialov . Moscow: Nauka, 339–364.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Shunji, I. & Hae-Young, K. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity . Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Kopotev, Mikhail, Aleksandr Klimov & Olesya Kisselev
2025. Exploring collocational complexity in L2 Russian: A corpus-driven contrastive analysis. International Journal of Bilingualism 29:2 ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Erman, Britt & Margareta Lewis
2024. Formulaic language in L1 and advanced L2 English speech: multiword structures in the speech of two Swedish groups compared to a group of L1 English speakers. Text & Talk 44:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Qihong & Li Mou
2024. A Corpus-Based Study of Lexical Chunks in Chinese Academic Discourse: Extraction, Classification, and Application. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14515], ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Xia, Detong, Yudi Chen & Hye K. Pae
2023. Lexical and grammatical collocations in beginning and intermediate L2 argumentative essays: a bigram study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1421 ff. DOI logo
B. Silva, Breno
2022. The Importance of General and Academic Vocabulary Learning. In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Chan-Chia & Shu-Kai Hsieh
2022. Identifying lexical bundles in Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yuan Ke & An Bang Fang
2022. Synergistic effects of multiword sequences structure, function, frequency and association on raters’ evaluations of essay quality. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
O'Keeffe, Anne & Geraldine Mark
2022. Principled pattern curation to guide data-driven learning design. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:3 ► pp. 100028 ff. DOI logo
Tan, Yi & Ute Römer
2022. Using phrase-frames to trace the language development of L1 Chinese learners of English. System 108 ► pp. 102844 ff. DOI logo
He, Mengyu, Leng Hong Ang & Kim Hua Tan
2021. A corpus-driven analysis of phrase frames in research articles on business management. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Min & Yiqiong Zhang
2021. ‘According to…’: The impact of language background and writing expertise on textual priming patterns of multi-word sequences in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 61 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Alvin Cheng‐Hsien
2019. Assessing Phraseological Development in Word Sequences of Variable Lengths in Second Language Texts Using Directional Association Measures. Language Learning 69:2 ► pp. 440 ff. DOI logo
Garner, James, Scott Crossley & Kristopher Kyle
2019. N-gram measures and L2 writing proficiency. System 80 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana & Anthony Becker
2019. Lexical bundles in university course materials. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
GARNER, JAMIE & SCOTT CROSSLEY
2018. A Latent Curve Model Approach To Studying L2 N‐Gram Development. The Modern Language Journal 102:3 ► pp. 494 ff. DOI logo
Juknevičienė, Rita & Łukasz Grabowski
2018. Comparing Formulaicity of Learner Writing through Phrase-Frames: A Corpus-Driven Study of Lithuanian and Polish EFL Student Writing. Research in Language 16:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Bestgen, Yves
2017. Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence. System 69 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Bestgen, Yves
2018. Evaluating the frequency threshold for selecting lexical bundles by means of an extension of the Fisher's exact test. Corpora 13:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Garner, James R.
2016. A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka
2015. The English Vocabulary Profile as a benchmark for assigning levels to learner corpus data. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue