Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2014) ► pp.163–177

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages

The ICCI corpus

 | Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
 | University of Jaén
Published online: 9 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton
References (47)
Anthony, L. 2004. “AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit”. Proceedings of IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning , 7–13.
Barlow, M. 2005. “Computer based analyses of learner language”. In R. Ellis & G. Barkhuizen (Eds.), Analysing Learner Language . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–358.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Monoconc Pro (Version 2) . Houston: Athelstan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. “The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity”. Language Learning , 33 (1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnard, L. 2004. “BNC-Baby and Xaira”. In TALC 2004: Proceedings of the Sixth Teaching and Language Corpora conference , Granada, 84–85.
Burt, M., Dulay, H. & Hernandez-Chavez, E. 1975. Bilingual Syntax Measure . New York: ­Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M. B. & Zaytseva, E. Forthcoming. “Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency”. In P. Leclercq, H. Hilton & A. Edmonds (Eds.), Proficiency Assessment Measures in SLA Research: Measures and Practices . Multilingual Matters.
Corder, S. P. 1967. “The significance of learner’s errors”. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 51, 161–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Language: Learning, Teaching, Assessment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. 2011. “Shared features of L2 writing: Intergroup homogeneity and text classification”. Journal of Second Language Writing , 20 (4), 271–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, M. B. 2011. “Learner corpora and testing: Analysing CEFR levels in the University Entrance Examination in Spain”. Paper presented at the Learner Corpus Research 2011. 20 Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead . Centre for English corpus linguistics, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium, 15–17 September.
2012. “The use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admission examination”. Revista de Educación , 3571, 55–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M. & Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.) 1985. Input in Second Language Acquisition . Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. 1994. “The Learner Corpus: A revolution in applied linguistics”. English Today , 101, 25–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. (Ed.) 1998. Learner English on Computer . Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
Granger, S. 2002. “A bird’s eye view of learner corpus research”. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. 2009. International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 . Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, L. & Ginther, A. 2000. “Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences”. Journal of Second Language Writing , 9 (2), 123–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregg, K. 1984. “Krashen’s monitor and Occam’s razor”. Applied Linguistics , 5 (2), 79–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S. 2010. Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage . Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M. 2008. “Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation”. English Text Construction , 1 (1), 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. & Filipović, L. 2012. Criterial Features in L2 English: Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing . London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izumi, E., Uchimoto, K. & Isahara, H. (Eds.) 2004. Nihon-jin 1200-nin no Eigo Speaking Corpus . Tokyo: ALC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowskia, D. & Ferris, D. 2003. “Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions”. Journal of Second Language Writing , 12 (7), 377–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & Dahl, M. 1991. “Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 13 (2), 215–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning . Oxford: ­Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications . London/New York: ­Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X. 2012. “The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives”. The Modern Language Journal , 96 (2), 190–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. 1983. “Does second language instruction make a difference: A review of research”. TESOL Quarterly , 17 (3), 359–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1991. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk . New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. 1981. “On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 31, 109–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Negishi, M., Tono, Y. & Fujita, Y. 2013. “A validation study of the CEFR levels of phrasal verbs in the English Vocabulary Profile”. English Profile Journal , 31. Available at: [URL] (accessed May 2013).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pendar, N., & Chapelle, C. A. 2008. “Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological issues”. CALICO Journal , 251, 189–206.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petch-Tyson, S. 1998. “Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer . London/New York: Longman, 107–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1984. “Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 61, 186–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, P. 2009. Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. Available at: [URL] (accessed January 2014).
Sánchez-Tornel, M., Alcaraz, J. M. & Pérez-Paredes, P. 2009. “Collaborative annotation in implementing corpora for content and language integrated learning web services”. In A. Gimeno Sanz (Ed.), New Trends in CALL: Working Together . London: Macmillan ELT, 279–284.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. “Interlanguage”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 101, 209–232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. 2010. “Key issues in teaching and learning vocabulary”. In C. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán & M. Torreblanca López (Eds.), Insights into Non-native Vocabulary Teaching and Learning . Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 28–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2014. WordSmith Tools Version 6 . Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 1983. “On the variability of interlanguage systems”. Applied Linguistics , 4 (2), 142–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thewissen, J. 2013. “Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error-tagged learner corpus”. The Modern Language Journal , 97 (S1), 77–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tono, Y. (Ed.) 2007. NihonjinChukousei 10000-nin no Eigo Corpus . Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Lopopolo, Olga, Arianna Bienati, Jennifer-Carmen Frey, Aivars Glaznieks & Stefania Spina
2025. Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 100170 ff. DOI logo
Römer-Barron, Ute
2024. How do constructions with modal verbs develop in second language learners of English?. Journal of Second Language Studies 7:2 ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2023. A corpus-based study of the acquisition of the English progressive by L1 Chinese learners: from prototypical activities to marked statives. Linguistics 61:3 ► pp. 749 ff. DOI logo
Glaznieks, Aivars, Jennifer-Carmen Frey, Maria Stopfner, Lorenzo Zanasi & Lionel Nicolas
2022. Leonide. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
O'Keeffe, Anne & Geraldine Mark
2022. Principled pattern curation to guide data-driven learning design. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:3 ► pp. 100028 ff. DOI logo
O’Keeffe, Anne & Geraldine Mark
2022. The English Grammar Profile of learner competence. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Genç-Yöntem, Ece & Evrim Eveyik-Aydın
2021. The compilation of a developmental spoken English corpus of Turkish EFL learners. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Bell, Philippa, Laura Collins & Emma Marsden
2020. Building an Oral and Written Learner Corpus of a School Programme: Methodological Issues. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
2020. Noun phrase complexity in young Spanish EFL learners’ writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Tono, Yukio
2020. Review of Fuchs, Robert and Valentin Werner. 2019. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN: 978-9-027-20715-9. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Callies, Marcus
2019. Integrating corpus literacy into language teacher education. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Callies, Marcus
2019. Integrating corpus literacy into language teacher education. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & María Belén Díez-Bedmar
2019. Researching learner language through POS keyword and syntactic complexity analyses. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 92], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2019. A corpus perspective on the development of verb constructions in second language learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 268 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Yan, Akira Murakami, Theodora Alexopoulou & Anna Korhonen
2018. Dependency parsing of learner English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Werner, Valentin
2017. Adversative Pragmatic Markers in Learner Language: A Cross-Sectional Perspective. Corpus Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Corpus Linguistics for Language Learning Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 12], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue