Cover not available

Review published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2014) ► pp.156161

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (6)
References
Bolinger, D. 1974. “Concept and percept: Two infinitive constructions and their vicissitudes.” In Phonetic Society of Japan (Eds), World Papers in Phonetics: Festschrift for Dr. Onish Kizyu. Tokyo: Phonetic Society of Japan, 65–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S. Th. 2009. “Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tummers, J., Heylen, K. & Geeraerts, D. 2005. “Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1 (2), 225–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. 2005. “Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34 (4), 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. “Corpus linguistics, theoretical linguistics, and cognitive/psycholinguistics: Towards more and more fruitful exchanges”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Huber (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 41–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue