Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:3 (2018) ► pp.255–278

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts

 | Lancaster University
 | Birkbeck, University of London
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 29 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak
Abstract
Using corpus linguistics and qualitative, manual discourse analysis, this paper compares English and French extremist texts to determine how messages in different languages draw upon similar and distinct discursive themes and linguistic strategies. Findings show that both corpora focus on religion and rewards (i.e. for faith) and strongly rely on othering strategies. However, the English texts are concerned with world events whereas the French texts focus on issues specific to France. Also, while the English texts use Arabic code-switching as a form of legitimation, the French texts use a formal register and quotation from scripture in discussions of permissions, rights, obligations and laws. Finally, the English texts refer to and justify violence to a greater extent than the French texts. This paper contributes to the field of terrorism studies and the field of corpus linguistics by presenting a new approach to corpus-driven studies of discourse across more than one language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The violent extremism and publications of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Common categories
    • 4.2English categories
    • 4.3French categories
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Aggarwal, N. K. (2017). Exploiting the Islamic State-Taliban rivalry for counterterrorism messaging. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(1), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ali, S. (2015). British Muslims in Numbers. London: The Muslim Council of Britain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2016). AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buril, F. (2017). Changing God’s expectations and women’s consequent behaviors – How ISIS manipulates “Divine Commandments” to influence women’s role in Jihad. Journal of Terrorism Research, 8(3), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conoscenti, M. (2016). ISIS’ Dabiq communicative strategies, NATO and Europe. Who is learning from whom? In M. Ceretta & B. Curli (Eds.), Discourses and Counter-discourses on Europe: From the Enlightenment to the EU (pp. 215–244). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Droogan, J., & Peattie, S. (2016). Reading jihad: Mapping the shifting themes of Inspire magazine. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(4), 684–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esposito, J. L. (2014). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frampton, M., Fisher, A., & Prucha, N. (2017). The new netwar: Countering extremism online. London: Policy Exchange. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A. (2012, September) Keyness: Appropriate metrics and practical issues. Paper presented at CADS 2012, Bologna, Italy.
Ghilan, M. (2013, June 8). It’s extremist Muslims, not Islamic extremism. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
HM Government. (2013). Tackling extremism in the UK. Cabinet Office: London. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, H. J. (2017). An analysis of Inspire and Dabiq: Lessons from AQAP and Islamic State’s propaganda war. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(5), 357–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, M. (2003). Coming to terms, Fundamentalists or Islamists? Middle East Quarterly, (Spring 2003), 65–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurence, J., & Vaïsse, J. (2006). Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novenario, C. M. I. (2016). Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State Through Strategies Publicized in Jihadist Magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(11), 953–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., Wignell, P., Bateman, J. A., Duc-Son, P., Grossman, M., & Vande Moere, A. (2016). Interpreting text and image relations in violent extremist discourse: A mixed methods approach for big data analytics. Terrorism and Political Violence. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse (pp. 11–20). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prentice, S., Taylor, P., Rayson, P., Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011). Analyzing the semantic content and persuasive composition of extremist media: A case study of texts produced during the Gaza conflict. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 61–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prentice, S., Taylor, P., Rayson, R., & Giebels, E. (2012). Differentiating act from ideology: Evidence from messages for and against violent extremism. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(3), 289–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, P. (2009). Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment [Computer software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergani, M., & Bliuc, A. M. (2015). The evolution of ISIS’ language: A quantitative analysis of the language of the first year of Dabiq magazine. Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società, 21, 7–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vessey, R. (2013). Challenges in cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wignell, P., Tan, S., & O’Halloran, K. (2017a). Under the shade of AK47s: A multimodal approach to violent extremist recruitment strategies for foreign fighters. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(3), 429–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Violent extremism and iconisation: Commanding good and forbidding evil? Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K., & Lange, R. (2017c). A mixed methods empirical examination of changes in emphasis and style in the extremist magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11(2), 2–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zelin, A. Y. (2015). Picture or it didn’t happen: A snapshot of the Islamic State’s official media output. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Hellström, Saara, Valtteri Skantsi, Anna Salmela & Veronika Laippala
2025. From keywords to key embeddings – contrasting French and Swedish web registers using multilingual deep learning. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo
Iorga, Mihaela
2025. Introduction. In Narratives of Immigration in the EU, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni, Kate Macfarlane & Mamoun Alazab
2024. A cyberterrorist behind the keyboard. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Osisanwo, Ayo
2024. Self-legitimation in selected speeches of Abubakar Shekau, the Boko Haram terrorists leader. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Osisanwo, Ayo
2025. Delegitimating the Nigerian State and other anti-Boko Haram in selected messages of Abubakar Shekau. Critical Studies on Terrorism 18:1 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Osisanwo, Ayo
2025. Manipulative and Recruitment Strategies in Boko Haram Terrorist Statements. Journal of Asian and African Studies 60:5 ► pp. 3303 ff. DOI logo
Tongjing, Wang, Zhao Yin, Ziyu Bao & Evert Meijers
2024. Intercity relationships between 293 Chinese cities quantified based on toponym co-occurrence. Cybergeo DOI logo
Patterson, Katie J.
2023. Dualisms in Jihad. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya & Qiong Wang
2023. Mapping the Field of Register Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sage Open 13:4 DOI logo
Tongjing, Wang, Evert Meijers & Huijuan Wang
2023. The multiplex relations between cities: a lexicon-based approach to detect urban systems. Regional Studies 57:8 ► pp. 1592 ff. DOI logo
Bouko, Catherine, Brigitte Naderer, Diana Rieger, Pieter Van Ostaeyen & Pierre Voué
2022. Discourse patterns used by extremist Salafists on Facebook: identifying potential triggers to cognitive biases in radicalized content. Critical Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Brookes, Gavin & Tony McEnery
2020. Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Caple, Helen, Changpeng Huan & Monika Bednarek
2020. Multimodal News Analysis across Cultures, DOI logo
Litvinova, Tatiana & Olga Litvinova
2020. Analysis and Detection of a Radical Extremist Discourse Using Stylometric Tools. In Digital Science 2019 [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1114], ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Tatsenko, Nataliia, Vitalii Stepanov & Hanna Shcherbak
2020. CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF POLITICS IN AMERICAN ENGLISH. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 893 ff. DOI logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ Moustafa
2019. The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study. Corpus Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Litvinova, Tatiana, Olga Litvinova & Galina Zavarzina
2019. Two Views on the 2010 Moscow Metro Bombings: Corpus-Based Contrastive Keyword Analysis. In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1038], ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. References. In Introduction to Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue