Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:4 (2018) ► pp.437–466

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord

 | Huazhong University of Science and Technology
 | Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Published online: 27 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17057.liu
Abstract
Using collocation-based approaches, semantic prosody analyses of lemmas like alleviate and cure yield judgments of negative prosody, which contradict common sense. This poses a challenge to the concept of semantic prosody and the principle of co-occurrence. To solve such contradictions, this paper proposes a new approach to semantic prosody analysis named ‘prosody concord’. The approach adopts collostruction as the locus of analysis on the basis of the explication of the unit of meaning model, and uses a mechanism for semantic prosody determination that incorporates multiple sources of information such as interactions of words, collocations, colligations and semantic preferences. Case studies of the lemmas budge, credibility, cause and alleviate show that the proposed approach can solve the contradictions and provide a consistent means for semantic prosody analysis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Semantic prosody and semantic prosody analysis
    • 2.1Defining semantic prosody
    • 2.2Semantic prosody analysis
      • 2.2.1Collocation-based semantic prosody analysis
      • 2.2.2Discourse-based semantic prosody analysis
  • 3.Prosody concord
    • 3.1Collostruction as locus of semantic prosody
    • 3.2Mechanism for determining semantic prosody
  • 4.Case studies
    • 4.1 budge
    • 4.2 credibility
    • 4.3 cause
    • 4.4 alleviate
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Ahmadian, M., Yazdani, H., & Darabi, A. (2011). Assessing English learners’ knowledge of semantic prosody through a corpus-driven design of semantic prosody test. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 288–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, L., & Thompson, G. (2014). “The many faces and phases of evaluation”. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in Context (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2008). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics & Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benamara, F., Tabooada, M., & Mathieu, Y. (2017). Evaluative language beyond bags of words: Linguistic insights and computational applications. Computational Linguistics, 43(1), 201–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 191, 419–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dam-Jensen, H., & Zethsen, K. K. (2007). Pragmatic patterns and the lexical system – A reassessment of evaluation in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1608–1623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Translator awareness of semantic prosodies. Target: International Journal on Translation Studies, 20(2), 203–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dilts, P., & Newman, J. (2006). A note on quantifying “good” and “bad” prosodies. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 233–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Frey, E. (2009). “The psychological reality of collocation and semantic prosody (2): Affective priming”. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language (pp. 473–497). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis  – A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, X., Zheng, L., Zhu, L., Yang, Z., Chen, C., Zhang, L., … Dienes, Z. (2011). Acquisition of conscious and unconscious knowledge of semantic prosody. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 417–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2004). Lexical priming and the properties of text. In A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman, Corpora and Discourse (pp. 385–412). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, J. D. (2011). Making Verb Argument Adjunct Distinction in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Colorado, US.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isama, H., Zainb, M. I. M., Mutalibc, M. A., & Harond, R. (2014). Semantic prosody of [pendidikan / education] from Khaled Nordin’s perspective: An analysis of speech texts based on corpus linguistic methodology. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1181, 172–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1974). Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). 100 million words of English. English Today, 9(1), 9–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Barker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Contextual prosodic theory: Bring semantic prosodies to life. In C. Heffer, H. Sauntson & G. Fox (Eds.), Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on his Retirement (pp. 48–94). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacMillan English-Chinese Dictionary for Advanced Learners (2005). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. (Original work published 2002)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2007). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, P., & Ferrer, E. E. (2006). The notion of argument in prepositional phrase attachment. Computational Linguistics, 32(3), 341–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morley, J., & Partington, A. (2009). A few frequently asked questions about semantic  – or evaluative  – prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 139–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nordquist, D. (2004). Comparing elicite data and corpora. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture, and Mind (pp. 211–223). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IN: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2004). “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004a). The lexical item. In J. Sinclair & R. Carter (Eds.), Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse (pp. 149–172). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). The search for units of meaning. In J. Sinclair & R. Carter (Eds.), Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse (pp. 131–148). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, K. A., & Nordquist, D. (2012). A critical and historical investigation into semantic prosody. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 13(2), 291–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snefjella, B., & Connolly, J. (2016). Searching for neurophysiological evidence for semantic prosody: An ERP study using generalized additive mixed models. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1081, 167–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanford NLP Group. (2015). Stanford Parser (Version 3.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed September 2018).
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, D. (2010). Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001a). On inference theories and code theories: Corpus evidence for semantic schemas. Text, 21(3), 436–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001b). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, X. (2017). Lexeme-based collexeme analysis with DepCluster. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 13(1), 165–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thackeray, W. M. (2010). Vanity Fair: A Novel without a Hero. London: Penguin Classics. (Original work published in 1898).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, N., & Li, X. (2014). Exploring semantic preference and semantic prosody across English and Chinese: Their roles for cross-linguistic equivalence. Corpus Linguistics & Linguistic Theory, 10(1), 103–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitsitt, S. (2005). A critique of the concept of semantic prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(3), 283–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Grabowski, Łukasz & Aleksandar Trklja
2024. Unravelling the complexity of semantic prosody: A theoretical inquiry. Journal of Pragmatics 226 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Grabowski, Łukasz
2022. Provoke or encourage improvements? On semantic prosody in English-to-Polish translation. Perspectives 30:1 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Jurko, Primož
2022. Semantic prosody of Slovene adverb–verb collocations: introducing the top-down approach. Corpora 17:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Jianpeng, Luyao Zhang & Xiaohui Bai
2022. Dependency network-based approach to the implicit structure and semantic diffusion modes of semantic prosody. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:3 ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Xuri
2021. How metaphoremes emerge. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Hong
2021. “What do you know about semantic prosody?” Teaching and evaluating implicit knowledge of English with corpus-assisted methods. English in Education 55:4 ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue