Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:3 (2018) ► pp.279–310
The creative use of absences
A corpus stylistic approach to Henry Green’s Living
Published online: 29 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17035.mon
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17035.mon
Abstract
In an article published in this journal, Partington, A. (2014). Mind the gaps. The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. addresses the criticism often
made against corpus linguistics that it is apparently unable to cope with absences. He convincingly argues that corpus
linguistics is better suited to account for absences than has been claimed. I resume the debate by discussing a type of absence
not fully addressed in Partington, A. (2014). Mind the gaps. The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. which I have termed ‘creative absences’. With
a focus on corpus stylistics, I consider the way in which the author Henry Green dispenses with a compulsory element in the
grammatical structure of Standard English, i.e. the determiner (mainly, the definite article). By means of a manual analysis as
well as two corpus stylistic analyses (keyness and text-type analysis) of the novel Living (Green, H. (1929). Living. London: Harvill Harper Collins.), I explore the effects of such an unorthodox use and argue, alongside Partington, A. (2014). Mind the gaps. The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. , for the usefulness of corpus approaches to account for at least certain types of
absences.
Keywords: absences, corpus stylistics, keyness, text type, methodological triangulation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Henry Green’s Living and his theory of art
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results of accounting for absences manually
- 5.Results of corpus-assisted analyses
- 5.1Underused tags: Wmatrix analysis
- 5.2Multidimensional functional analysis of Living: MAT
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (37)
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Duguid, A. (2010). Investigating anti and some reflections on modern-diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS). Corpora, 5(2), 191–220.
Gabrielatos, C. (2017, October). Clusters of keyness. A principled approach to selecting key items. Paper presented at the Corpus Linguistics in the South 15 Conference, Cambridge, UK.
(2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review (pp. 225–258). London: Routledge.
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A. (2011, November). Keyness. Matching metrics to definitions. Paper presented at the Corpus Linguistics in the South: Theoretical-methodological challenges in corpus approaches to discourse studies – and some ways of addressing them, Portsmouth, UK.
(2012, September). Keyness. Appropriate metrics and practical issues. Paper presented at the CADS Conference, Bologna, Italy.
(1958). The art of fiction. In M. Yorke (Ed.), Surviving (pp. 234–250). London: Harvill Harper Collins.
Hardy, D. (2005). Towards a stylistic typology of narrative gaps: Knowledge gapping in Flannery O’Connor’s fiction. Language and Literature, 14(4), 363–375.
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., de Joode, J., Smith, C., & Brook O’Donnell, M. (2016). CLiC Dickens: Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora, 11(3), 433–463.
Marchi, A. (2010). ‘The moral in the story’: A diachronic investigation of lexicalised morality in the UK press. Corpora, 5(2), 161–190.
Mellor, L. (2011). Reading the Ruins: Modernism, Bombsites and British Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Millar, N. (2009). Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 191–220.
Moon, R. (2011). English adjectives in – like, and the interplay of collocation and morphology. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(4), 486–513.
Nini, A. (2015). Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (Version 1.3) [Computer software]. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Partington, A. (2014). Mind the gaps. The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146.
Rácz, P. (2012). Operationalising salience: Definite article reduction in the North of England. English Language and Linguistics, 16(1), 57–79.
Rayson, P. (2009). Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment. [Computer software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Retrieved from [URL] (last access August 2018).
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Stanford Tagger (2013). (Version 3.1.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Werner, Valentin
Lambrou, Marina
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
