Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:4 (2018) ► pp.467–493

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

General extenders and discourse variation

A focus on Lithuanian

 | Vytautas Magnus University
Published online: 27 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17019.ruz
Abstract
The present study accounts for the use of general extenders (GEs) in spoken and written registers. The repertoire and usage of GEs is analysed in Lithuanian by focusing on their distribution across different registers, their structural properties, and discourse-pragmatic functions. The study is based on a reference corpus of Lithuanian, which includes four subcorpora of written discourse and a subcorpus of spoken discourse. The findings indicate that there are some significant cross-generic differences in GE frequency, but most frequently GEs in Lithuanian are used in written academic discourse. With regard to the structural types of GEs, adjunctives are considerably more frequent than disjunctives. GE structure allows for a large degree of variation, and in spoken interaction GEs can include deictic elements. Concerning discourse-pragmatic functions, GEs are predominantly used to serve textual and interpersonal functions, which appear to be strongly related to the structural type of the GE and discourse settings.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Context-sensitivity and variation of GEs
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1GE variation across registers: Spoken vs. written
    • 4.2Structural features of Lithuanian GEs
    • 4.3Qualitative analysis of discourse-pragmatic functions
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (54)
References
Adolphs, S., Atkins, S., & Harvey, K. (2007). Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague Language Explored (pp. 62–78). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (1985). What happens at the end of our utterances? – The use of utterance-final tags introduced by and and or. In O. Togeby (Ed.), Papers from the Eighth Scandinavian Conference (pp. 366–389). Copenhagen: Institut for Nordisk Filologi Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). English Discourse Particles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 173–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambrazas, V., Garšva, K., Girdenis, A., Jakaitienė, E., Kniūkšta, P., Krinickaitė, … Valiulytė, E. (2005). Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos gramatika. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, B. (1989). Terminating devices in spoken French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 27(3), 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bielinskienė, A. (2010). Sujungiamojo ryšio semantika, pragmatika ir vartosenos ypatumai (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buysse, L. (2014). ‘We went to the restroom or something’: general extenders ‘and stuff’ in the speech of Dutch learners of English. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), The Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms (pp. 213–237). Berlin/New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalization, and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(2), 155–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, G. (2007). ‘This we have done’: The vagueness of poetry and public relations. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague Language Explored (pp. 21–39). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotterill, J. (2007). ‘I think he was kind of shouting or something’: Uses and abuses of vagueness in the British courtroom. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague Language Explored (pp. 97–116). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1979). Advanced Conversational English. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cucchi, C. A. (2007). An investigation of general extenders in a corpus of EU parliamentary debates. In M. Davies, P. Rayson, & S. Hunston (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference CL2007, University of Birmingham, 27–30 July, (pp. 1–13). Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed June 2016).
De Cock, S. (2004). Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. BELL: Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, 21, 225–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denis, D. (2011). Innovators and innovation: Tracking the innovators of ‘and stuff’ in York English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 39, 17(2), 59–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dines, E. R. (1980). Variation in discourse – ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society, 9(1), 13–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drave, N. (2002). Vaguely speaking: A corpus approach to vague language in intercultural conversations. In P. Peters, P. Colins, & A. Smith (Eds.), Language and Computers, New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Papers from the Twenty First International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (pp. 25–40). Amsterdam/New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, S. (1992). Extension particles, etc., Language Variation and Change, 16(4), 179–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grzybek, P., & Verdonik, D. (2014). General extenders: From interaction to mode. In V. Jesenšek, P. Grzybek (Eds.), Phraseology in Dictionaries and Corpora (pp. 113–130). Maribor: Bielsko Biała.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ediger, A. M. (1995). An Analysis of Set-Marking Tags in the English Language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evison, J., McCarthy, M., & O’Keeffe, A. (2007). ‘‘Looking out for love and all the rest of it’’: Vague category markers as shared social space. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague Language Explored (pp. 138–157). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, J. (2015). General extender use in spoken Peninsular Spanish: Metapragmatic awareness and pedagogical implications. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, A. (2007). ‘About twelve thousand or so’: Vagueness in North American and UK offices’. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague Language Explored (pp. 40–61). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Y. L. (2013). Vague language and interpersonal communication: An analysis of adolescent intercultural conversation. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 1(2), 69–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez, I. M. P. (2011). “I might, I might go I mean it depends on money things and stuff”: A preliminary analysis of general extenders in British teenagers’ discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(9), 2452–2470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metsä-Ketelä, M. (2012). Frequencies of vague expressions in English as an academic lingua franca. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(2), 263–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. (2004). ‘Like the wise virgins and all that jazz’: Using a corpus to examine vague categorisation and shared knowledge. Language and Computers, 52(1), 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (1995). The Form and Function of General Extenders in English Interactive Discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Whales, Candlelight and Stuff like that: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). And stuff ‘und so’: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1845–1864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (1997). On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 25(3), 250–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Tavangar, M. (2010). The metapragmatics of ‘and everything’ in Persian. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 10(1), 133–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Tayebi, T. (2014). Vaguely speaking in Persian. Discourse Processes, 51(7), 565–600. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V., Tavangar, M., Eslami Rasekh, A., & Izadi, D. (2012). About his friend, how good she is, ‘and this and that’: General extenders in Persian and EFL discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(3), 261–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pichler, H., & Levey, S. (2011). In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: General extenders in north-east England. English Language and Linguistics, 15(3), 441–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, P. (2016). Log-likelihood and Effect Size Calculator. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed August 2018).
Roth-Gordon, J. (2007). Youth, slang, and pragmatic expressions: Examples from Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(3), 322–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruzaitė, J. (2010). Translation equivalents of vague language items: A study of general extenders in a parallel corpus. Studies about Languages 161, 33–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Secova, M. (2008). Discourse-Pragmatic Features of Spoken French: Analysis and Pedagogical Implications (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of London, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C. (2004). Formulaic expressions in academic speech. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the Professions (pp. 37–64). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G., & Hasund, I. K. (2002). Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbe, M., & Holmes, J. (1995). ‘You know, eh’ and other exasperating expressions: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English. Language and Communication, 15(1), 63–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Denis, D. (2010). The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada. Journal of English Linguistics, 38(4), 335–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terraschke, A., & Holmes, J. (2007). ‘Und tralala’: Vagueness and general extenders in German and New Zealand English. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague Language Explored (pp. 198–220). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, S. E., Hesson, A., Bybel, K., & Little, H. (2015). Quantifying the referential function of general extenders in North American English. Language in Society, 44(5), 705–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, S., O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (2008). ‘…post-colonialism, multi-culturalism, structuralism, feminism, post-modernism and so on and so forth’: A comparative analysis of vague category markers in academic discourse. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings (pp. 9–30). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, G., & Birner, B. (1993). The semantics and pragmatics of ‘and everything’. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(3), 205–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, J., & Norrby, C. (1999). Set marking tags ‘and stuff’. In Henderson, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Perth: University of Western Australia. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed December 2016).
Youssef, V. (1993). Marking solidarity across the Trinidad speech community: The use of ‘an ting’ in medical counselling to break down power differentials. Discourse & Society, 4(3), 291–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Overstreet, Maryann
2020. The English general extender. English Today 36:4 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue