Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 23:2 (2018) ► pp.125–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Dimensions of variation across Internet registers

 | Catholic University of São Paulo
Published online: 5 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15026.ber
Abstract
This paper presents a study that sought to identify the dimensions of variation underlying a corpus of Internet texts, using (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar multi-dimensional (MD) analysis framework. The corpus was compiled following the method proposed by (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, according to which the size of each register subcorpus should be determined based on the linguistic variation across the texts. The corpus was tagged using the Biber Tagger and the features were counted and submitted to a factor analysis, which suggested three factors. The factors were interpreted as three dimensions of variation: involved, interactive discourse versus informational focus; expression of stance: interactional evidentiality; and expression of stance: interactional affect. The amount of register variation captured by the register distinctions on the dimensions ranged from 8.7% to 57.1%. Dimension 1 corroborate the oral/involved versus literate/informational distinction defined in previous MD studies of non-Internet registers, whereas Dimensions 2 and 3 highlight the important role played by stance in social media.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research on Internet registers in the multi-dimensional framework
  • 3.Corpus design and collection
  • 4.Statistical analysis
  • 5.Dimensions of register variation
    • 5.1Dimension 1: Involved, interactive discourse versus informational focus
    • 5.2Dimension 2: Expression of stance: Interactional evidentiality
    • 5.3Dimension 3: Expression of stance: Interactional affect
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
References (55)
References
Berber Sardinha, T. (2014). 25 years later: Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 81–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C., & Mayer Acunzo, C. (2014). A Multidimensional Analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Corpora, 9(2), 239–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M. (2017). American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora, 12(1), 85–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.) (forthcoming). Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Bertoli-Dutra, P. (2014). Multi-Dimensional analysis of pop songs. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 149–175). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64(4), 707–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1984). A Model of Textual Relations within the Written and Spoken Modes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Dimensions of Register Variation – A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013a). An interview with Douglas Biber [conducted by Bethany Gray]. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(4), 359–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Twenty-five years of Biber’s Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Introduction to the special issue and an interview with Douglas Biber [conducted by Eric Friginal]. Corpora, 8(2), 137–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). A user-based taxonomy of web registers. Paper presented at the Second Asia-Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference, Hong Kong Polytechnic, Hong Kong.
(forthcoming). Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(2), 95–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Hared, M. (1994). Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. In D. Biber and E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 182–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1(1), 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J. (2007). Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1972). Degree Words. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, C., & Kytö, M. (2014). I had lost sight of them then for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: Two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus. In I. Taavitsainen, A. H. Jucker & J. Tuominen (Eds.), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics (pp. 29–52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collot, M. (1991). The Situtational Features and Textual Dimensions of Electronic Language. (Unpublished MA thesis). Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condi de Souza, R. (2014). Dimensions of variation in TIME magazine. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 177–196). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text – Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). O princípio: Entrevista com David Crystal [The beginning: An interview of David Crystal, conducted by Tania Shepherd and Tania G. Saliés]. In T. M. G. Shepherd & T. Salies (Eds.), Linguística da Internet [Internet Linguistics] (pp. 17–36). São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl (2018). Command line tool and library for transferring data with URLs. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed May 2018).
(forthcoming). Corpus design and representativeness. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M. (2015). Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1817–1831. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G., & Hunston, S. (1996). Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins, COBUILD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friginal, E. (2008). Linguistic variation in the discourse of outsourced call centers. Discourse Studies, 10(6), 715–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friginal, E., & Hardy, J. A. (2014). Conducting Multi-Dimensional analysis using SPSS. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 298–316). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T. (2010). Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies (pp. 303–322). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Language and the order of nature. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing Science: Literacy as Discursive Power (pp. 117–136). London: Falmer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E. (2012). Filipino and American online communication and linguistic variation. World Englishes, 31(2), 143–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated Communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (2013a). Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In S. C. Herring, D. Stein & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication (pp. 3–33). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2013b). Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y. -J. & Biber, D. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register (pp. 157–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2007). New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 133–150). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Precht, K. (2003). Great vs lovely: Stance differences in American and British English. In P. Leistyna & C. F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (pp. 133–151). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reppen, R. (2001). Register variation in student and adult speech and writing. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (pp. 187–199). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2015). Register variation: A corpus approach. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 1 (pp. 505–525). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titak, A., & Roberson, A. (2013). Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8(2), 235–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tweepy (2018). An easy to use Python library for accessing the Twitter API. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed May 2018).
Veirano Pinto, M. (2014). Dimensions of variation in North American movies. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 109–148). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xie, S., Tang, J., & Wang, T. (2014). Topic related opinion integration for users of social media. In H. Huang, T. Liu, H. -P. Zhang & J. Tang (Eds.), Social Media Processing: Third National Conference, SMP 2014 (pp. 164–174). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Demir, Nur Yağmur & Jesse Egbert
2026. Register alignment of ChatGPT-generated academic texts. Applied Corpus Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 100174 ff. DOI logo
Coussé, Evie & Yvonne Adesam
2025. Exploring the language of Swedish social media: A contrastive corpus analysis. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Erten-Johansson, Selcen & Veronika Laippala
2025. 33Utilizing Text Dispersion Keyness on Turkish web registers: The case of Informational Description and Opinion. In Exploring digitally-mediated communication with corpora, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Frenken, Florian
2025. 115A multivariate register perspective on Reddit: Exploring lexicogrammatical variation in online communities. In Exploring digitally-mediated communication with corpora, ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Grieve, Jack, Sara Bartl, Matteo Fuoli, Jason Grafmiller, Weihang Huang, Alejandro Jawerbaum, Akira Murakami, Marcus Perlman, Dana Roemling & Bodo Winter
2025. The sociolinguistic foundations of language modeling. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 7 DOI logo
Hellström, Saara, Valtteri Skantsi, Anna Salmela & Veronika Laippala
2025. From keywords to key embeddings – contrasting French and Swedish web registers using multilingual deep learning. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo
Hu, Changwei, Yu Zhu & Liangjie Yuan
2025. Influences of Language Functions on Linguistic Features: Multi-Dimensional and Entropy Analyses of Academic and Entertainment Registers. Entropy 27:8 ► pp. 783 ff. DOI logo
Messerli, Thomas C, Daria Dayter, Sven Leuckert, Aatu Liimatta, Hanna Mahler, Axel Bohmann, Gustavo Kozma & Rafaela Tosin
2025. Digital debating cultures: communicative practices on Reddit. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 40:1 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Kan & Defeng Li
2025. The Functional Aspect of Translator Style. In Researching Translator's Functional Style [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Kan & Defeng Li
2025. When martial artists speak: A stylometric analysis of orality features in English translations of Wuxia fiction. Studia Neophilologica ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Qin, Tomoji Tabata & Yu Zhu
2025. Multi-dimensional analysis of Japanese native speakers’ L2 Chinese writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 68 ► pp. 101204 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Ni & Marcus Müller
2025. What is German ‘Angst’ (fear/anxiety)? A corpus approach based on frame analysis. Language and Cognition 17 DOI logo
Erten-Johansson, Selcen, Valtteri Skantsi, Sampo Pyysalo & Veronika Laippala
2024. Linguistic variation beyond the Indo-European web. Register Studies 6:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yang & Hui Ren
2024. A multi-dimensional analysis of corporate blogs. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Li, Haipeng, Jonathan Dunn & Andrea Nini
2023. Register variation remains stable across 60 languages. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:3 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya & Qiong Wang
2023. Mapping the Field of Register Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sage Open 13:4 DOI logo
Berber Sardinha, Tony
2022. A text typology of social media. Register Studies 4:2 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Clarke, Isobelle
2022. A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of English tweets. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:2 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Diao, Hong
2022. Homogenized literary co-translation: A Hero Born and A Bond Undone. Across Languages and Cultures 23:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Li, Haipeng & Jonathan Dunn
2022. Corpus similarity measures remain robust across diverse languages. Lingua 275 ► pp. 103377 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yaqin & Haitao Liu
2022. Creativity complicates tweets: a quantitative lens on syntactic characteristics of twitter. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 37:1 ► pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
2021. Characterising Online News Comments: A Multi-Dimensional Cruise Through Online Registers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 DOI logo
Laippala, Veronika, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen
2021. Exploring the role of lexis and grammar for the stable identification of register in an unrestricted corpus of web documents. Language Resources and Evaluation 55:3 ► pp. 757 ff. DOI logo
Bowker, Lynne
2019. Register Variation Online. DouglasBiber and JesseEgbert. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2018. $110.00. 252 pp. (hardcover). (ISBN 9781107122161). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70:11 ► pp. 1293 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue