E. Smitterberg. The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, (2005).

Reviewed by

Christopher Williams | University of Bari (Italy)

Published online: 8 December 2006

https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.08wil

References (24)

References

Arnaud, R. (1998). The development of the progressive in 19th century English: a quantitative survey. Language Variation and Change, 101, 123–152.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.

Fitzmaurice, S. M. (2004). The meaning and uses of the progressive construction in an early Eighteenth-century English network. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II: Unfolding Conversations (Topics in English Linguistics 451) (pp. 131–173). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Geisler, C. (2003). Gender-based variation in Nineteenth-century English letter writing. In P. Leistyna & C. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 461) (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

(2002). Investigating register variation in Nineteenth-century English: a multidimensional comparison. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91) (pp. 249–271). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

(2001). Gender-based variation in Nineteenth-century English letter-writing. Paper presented at the Third North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching , Boston.

(2000). Investigating register variation in Nineteenth-century English: a multidimensional comparison. Paper presented at the Second North American Symposium on Corpus Linguistics and Language Teaching , Flagstaff.

Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (Eds.) (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hundt, M. (2004). Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in modern English. English Language and Linguistics, 81, 47–69.

Killie, K. (2004). Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics, 81, 25–46.

König, E. (1980). On the context-dependence of the Progressive in English. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time, Tense, and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification (pp. 269–291). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Ljung, M. (1980). Reflections on the English Progressive (Gothenburg Studies in English 461). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Mossé, F. (1938). Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique. Vols. I-II1. (Collection linguistique publiée par la Société de linguistique de Paris) (pp. 42–43). Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.

Nuñez Pertejo, P. (2004). The Progressive in the History of English. München: Lincom.

Römer, U. (2005). Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Smith, C. (2004). Use of progressive aspect in 18th-century English: A study of personal letters. In I. Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño & B. Crespo Garcia (Eds.), New Trends in English Historical Linguistics: An Atlantic View (pp. 151–186). Universidade da Coruña.

Smith, N. (2005). A Corpus-based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. PhD thesis submitted at Lancaster University in June 2005.

(2002). ‘Ever moving on? The progressive in recent British English. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Research (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 361) (pp. 317–330). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

Smitterberg, E. (2004). Investigating the expressive progressive: On Susan M. Fitzmaurice’s ‘The meanings and uses of the progressive construction in an early eighteenth-century English network’. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II. Unfolding Conversations (Topics in English Linguistics 451) (pp. 175–182). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

(2000a). The progressive form and genre variation during the nineteenth century. In R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (Eds.), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL (Topics in English Linguistics 311) (pp. 283–297). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

(2000b). Pragmatic functions of the progressive form in the 19th century. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics , Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000.

Smitterberg, E., Reich, S. & Hahn, A. (2000). The present progressive in political and academic language in the 19th and 20th centuries: a corpus-based investigation. ICAME Journal, 241, 99–118.

Williams, C. (2002). Non-progressive and Progressive Aspect in English. Fasano di Puglia: Schena Editore.

Wright, S. (1994). The mystery of the modal progressive. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics 131) (pp. 467–485). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.