Cover not available

Article published In: Constructions in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Susan Hunston and Florent Perek
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3] 2019
► pp. 354–384

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames

 | University of Birmingham
 | University of Birmingham
Published online: 27 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00016.per
Abstract
Recent research in construction grammar has been marked by increasing efforts to create constructicons: detailed inventories of form-meaning pairs to describe the grammar of a given language, following the principles of construction grammar. This paper describes proposals for building a new constructicon of English, based on the combination of the COBUILD Grammar Patterns and the semantic frames of FrameNet. In this case study, the valency information from FrameNet was automatically matched to the verb patterns of COBUILD, in order to identify the frames that each pattern is associated with. We find that the automatic procedure must be complemented by a good deal of manual annotation. We examine the “V that” pattern in particular, illustrating how the frame information can be used to describe this pattern in terms of constructions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The COBUILD Grammar Patterns
  • 3.FrameNet
  • 4.Two complementary resources
  • 5.Merging the two resources
  • 6.Towards the English constructicon: A case study of the “V that” construction
    • 6.1From patterns to networks of frames
    • 6.2The Communication “V that” construction
    • 6.3The Mental_activity “V that” construction
    • 6.4Other “V that” constructions and relations between constructions
  • 7.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Boas, H. C. (2003). A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Eddington, D. (2006). A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language, 82 (2), 323–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, VI (2), 222–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J.-P. Koenig & A. Kathol (Eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation (pp. 113–128). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. (1992). Towards a frame-based Lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64 (3), 501–538.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. R., & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet Constructicon. In I. A. Sag & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 283–322). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G. (1993). A corpus-driven approach to grammar – principles, methods and examples. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E. (1996). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2004). Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th Edition). London & New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healy, A. & Miller, G. (1970). The verb as the main determinant of sentence meaning. Psychonomic Science, 20 (6), 372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. & Su, H. (2017). Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (3), 289–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75 (1), 1–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based Models of Language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Goldman, R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2018). The FrameNet Constructicon in action. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon Development Across Languages (pp. 19–40). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Forsberg, M., Prentice, J., Rydstedt, R., Sköldberg, E., & Tingsell, S. (2012). Adding a Constructicon to the Swedish resource network of Språkbanken. In Proceedings of KONVENS 2012 (LexSem 2012 workshop) (pp. 452–461). Vienna. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Ohara, K., & Torrent, T. T. (Eds.). (2018). Constructicography: Constructicon Development Across Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohara, K. H. (2013). Toward constructicon building for Japanese in Japanese FrameNet. Veredas, 17 (1), 11–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, F. (2014). Rethinking constructional polysemy: The case of the English conative construction. In D. Glynn & J. Robinson (Eds.), Polysemy and Synonymy: Corpus Methods and Applications in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, F., & Lemmens, M. (2010). Getting at the meaning of the English at-construction: The case of a constructional split. CogniTextes, 5 1. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley: ICSI. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Sinclair, J. et al. (Eds.) (1995). Collins COBUILD English Dictionary 2nd Edition. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996). The windowing of attention in language. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning (pp. 235–287). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrent, T. T., Lage, L. M., Sampaio, T. F., Tavares, T. S., & Matos, E. E. S. (2014). Revisiting border conflicts between FrameNet and Construction Grammar: Annotation policies for the Brazilian Portuguese Constructicon. Constructions and Frames, 6 (1), 34–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2025. What makes Construction Grammar relevant for contact linguistics — and vice versa?. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Borin, Lars & Benjamin Lyngfelt
2025. Framenets and ConstructiCons. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Chau, Meng Huat
2025. On corpus linguistics, the search for meaning, and a transversal-pluriversal turn in celebrating learner languaging. Applied Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 100172 ff. DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas
2025. Constructing Constructions for an English ConstructiCon or a ConstructiCon for English Constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 73:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Hunston, Susan
2025. Pattern Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lyngfelt, Benjamin & Tiago Timponi Torrent
2025. Constructicography. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2025. Idiosyncratic entrenchment: tracing change in constructional schematicity with nested random effects. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21:2 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Chengwen, Yu Wang, Miao Zhou & Endong Xun
2025. Reframing Chinese verb patterns through a chunk-based approach: a case study of legal judgments. Lingua 326 ► pp. 104024 ff. DOI logo
Song, Jie, Congcong Yang, Yichu Sun, Yunhua Qu, Kuizi Ma & Huiying Cai
2024. Quantitative Research on Chinese Sentences Structure Based on Pattern Grammar. Sage Open 14:3 DOI logo
Su, Hang, Jun Ye & Naixing Wei
2024. Integrating pattern grammar and local grammar into the identification of constructions and the development of a pedagogical constructicon in EAP context: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 70 ► pp. 101401 ff. DOI logo
Wible, David, Hsin-Ying Huang & Tzu-Yang Chao
2024. Zellig Harris’s Distributional Structure Renders Lexico-grammatical Constructions Discoverable to Learners. WORD 70:4 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2024. Constraction: a tool for the automatic extraction and interactive exploration of linguistic constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Bychkova, Polina & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2023. Towards pragmatic construction typology. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘Oscar sent Venice an elephant’: Construction Grammars and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yingying & Kevin McManus
2023. Investigating the psychological reality of argument structure constructions and N1 of N2 constructions: a comparison between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 503 ff. DOI logo
Patel, Malin, Armine Garibyan, Elodie Winckel & Stephanie Evert
2023. A reference constructicon as a database. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
SUNG, MIN-CHANG
2023. Functional idiosyncrasies of suggesting constructions in British English. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
Dunn, Jonathan
2022. Exposure and emergence in usage-based grammar: computational experiments in 35 languages. Cognitive Linguistics 33:4 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Dunn, Jonathan
2024. Computational Construction Grammar, DOI logo
Perek, Florent
2021. Construction Grammar in action: the English Constructicon project. CogniTextes 21:Volume 21 DOI logo
PEREK, FLORENT
2023. Construction Grammar and Usage‐Based Theory. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yingying & Xiaofei Lu
2020. N1 of N2 constructions in academic written discourse: A pattern grammar analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47 ► pp. 100893 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue